The geographic problem in cephalopod genomics

Publications describing genomes of various cephalopod species have recently proliferated. Some papers have involved large geographic distances between the collection locality of sequenced specimens and the type locality of the presumed species. However, cryptic species have been demonstrated in many...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Vecchione, Michael J. Sweeney, Paula L. Rothman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1090034/full
_version_ 1811205331105087488
author Michael Vecchione
Michael J. Sweeney
Paula L. Rothman
author_facet Michael Vecchione
Michael J. Sweeney
Paula L. Rothman
author_sort Michael Vecchione
collection DOAJ
description Publications describing genomes of various cephalopod species have recently proliferated. Some papers have involved large geographic distances between the collection locality of sequenced specimens and the type locality of the presumed species. However, cryptic species have been demonstrated in many cephalopods. Therefore, even if the sequenced specimen is very similar morphologically to the species in question, the likelihood that it is a member of the species in question decreases with increasing distance from the type locality. An associated problem is that many publications do not provide information adequate to determine the source locality for the genomic sequence. We reviewed a decade of literature on mitochondrial genomes of cephalopods and found a total of 43 publications containing 48 species within 23 genera. Of the 48 species, only 17 could be evaluated for our geographic question. Distances between sampling locality and type locality of the named species ranged from 0 nautical miles (sampled at type locality) to half-way around the world. Where data were present for distance calculation, the average for the 17 species was 3785 km (2044 nmi).
first_indexed 2024-04-12T03:30:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a82ad2221964e1e946157434b461e9d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T03:30:48Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-0a82ad2221964e1e946157434b461e9d2022-12-22T03:49:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452022-12-01910.3389/fmars.2022.10900341090034The geographic problem in cephalopod genomicsMichael Vecchione0Michael J. Sweeney1Paula L. Rothman2National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA/NMFS) National Systematics Lab., National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United StatesRetired, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United StatesPublications describing genomes of various cephalopod species have recently proliferated. Some papers have involved large geographic distances between the collection locality of sequenced specimens and the type locality of the presumed species. However, cryptic species have been demonstrated in many cephalopods. Therefore, even if the sequenced specimen is very similar morphologically to the species in question, the likelihood that it is a member of the species in question decreases with increasing distance from the type locality. An associated problem is that many publications do not provide information adequate to determine the source locality for the genomic sequence. We reviewed a decade of literature on mitochondrial genomes of cephalopods and found a total of 43 publications containing 48 species within 23 genera. Of the 48 species, only 17 could be evaluated for our geographic question. Distances between sampling locality and type locality of the named species ranged from 0 nautical miles (sampled at type locality) to half-way around the world. Where data were present for distance calculation, the average for the 17 species was 3785 km (2044 nmi).https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1090034/fullbiogeographygenomicsspecies complextype localitysampling
spellingShingle Michael Vecchione
Michael J. Sweeney
Paula L. Rothman
The geographic problem in cephalopod genomics
Frontiers in Marine Science
biogeography
genomics
species complex
type locality
sampling
title The geographic problem in cephalopod genomics
title_full The geographic problem in cephalopod genomics
title_fullStr The geographic problem in cephalopod genomics
title_full_unstemmed The geographic problem in cephalopod genomics
title_short The geographic problem in cephalopod genomics
title_sort geographic problem in cephalopod genomics
topic biogeography
genomics
species complex
type locality
sampling
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1090034/full
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelvecchione thegeographicproblemincephalopodgenomics
AT michaeljsweeney thegeographicproblemincephalopodgenomics
AT paulalrothman thegeographicproblemincephalopodgenomics
AT michaelvecchione geographicproblemincephalopodgenomics
AT michaeljsweeney geographicproblemincephalopodgenomics
AT paulalrothman geographicproblemincephalopodgenomics