Evaluation of Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation for Environmentally Sustainable Weed Management

In anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD), soil amended with a carbon source undergoes anaerobic conditions accompanied by changes in microbial community composition and an increase in the concentration of organic acids, primarily acetic and butyric acids, and gases that are deleterious to plant pathog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ram B. Khadka, Andres D. Sanabria-Velazquez, John Cardina, Sally A. Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/12/3147
_version_ 1797461809364467712
author Ram B. Khadka
Andres D. Sanabria-Velazquez
John Cardina
Sally A. Miller
author_facet Ram B. Khadka
Andres D. Sanabria-Velazquez
John Cardina
Sally A. Miller
author_sort Ram B. Khadka
collection DOAJ
description In anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD), soil amended with a carbon source undergoes anaerobic conditions accompanied by changes in microbial community composition and an increase in the concentration of organic acids, primarily acetic and butyric acids, and gases that are deleterious to plant pathogens, insects, and potentially to weeds. The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of ASD with different carbon sources on inactivation of propagules of a variety of weed species. Germination and viability of propagules of common lambsquarters (<i>Chenopodium album</i> L.), black nightshade (<i>Solanum nigrum</i> L.), yellow nutsedge (<i>Cyperus esculentus</i> L.), common pokeweed (<i>Phytolacca decandra</i> L.), barnyardgrass (<i>Echinochloa crus-galli</i> L.), dandelion (<i>Taraxacum officinale</i> (Weber)), and redroot pigweed (<i>Amaranthus retroflexus</i> L.) were tested using different rates of four carbon sources: molasses, wheat bran, mustard greens biomass, and raw chicken manure. Wheat bran was the most effective carbon source for inactivation of all weed propagules, followed by molasses and mustard greens biomass. Carbon sources were mixed with soil, which was irrigated to saturation and covered with plastic to promote anaerobic conditions for three weeks. Chicken manure inactivated all the tested species except <i>A. retroflexus</i> compared to the anaerobic control. Rates of carbon sources applied in soil were weakly but significantly correlated (<i>r</i> > 0.42 and <i>p</i> < 0.04) with weed seed mortality or germination inhibition (<i>E. crus-galli</i>) for all the tested carbon sources and weed species except for chicken manure for <i>C. album</i>, <i>A. retroflexus</i>, and <i>S. nigrum</i>. Laboratory tests to confirm organic acid toxicity showed that 1000 µL L<sup>−1</sup> acetic plus 1000 µL L<sup>−1</sup> butyric acids for at least 60 h inhibited of sprouting of <i>C. esculentus</i> tubers and <i>E. crusgalli</i> seeds, whereas 120 h or exposure was required to inhibit <i>C. album</i> seed germination. Anaerobic soil disinfestation effectively suppressed weed seed germination and viability when wheat bran, molasses and mustard greens biomass were used as carbon sources. This approach could be adopted for weed management in organic systems or any farming system where priority is given to environmentally sustainable practices.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:24:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a8e5082c36148e795ce266cafe97057
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:24:38Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-0a8e5082c36148e795ce266cafe970572023-11-24T12:47:15ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952022-12-011212314710.3390/agronomy12123147Evaluation of Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation for Environmentally Sustainable Weed ManagementRam B. Khadka0Andres D. Sanabria-Velazquez1John Cardina2Sally A. Miller3Department of Plant Pathology, CFAES Wooster Campus, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH 43210, USADepartment of Plant Pathology, CFAES Wooster Campus, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH 43210, USADepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, CFAES Wooster Campus, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH 43210, USADepartment of Plant Pathology, CFAES Wooster Campus, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH 43210, USAIn anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD), soil amended with a carbon source undergoes anaerobic conditions accompanied by changes in microbial community composition and an increase in the concentration of organic acids, primarily acetic and butyric acids, and gases that are deleterious to plant pathogens, insects, and potentially to weeds. The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of ASD with different carbon sources on inactivation of propagules of a variety of weed species. Germination and viability of propagules of common lambsquarters (<i>Chenopodium album</i> L.), black nightshade (<i>Solanum nigrum</i> L.), yellow nutsedge (<i>Cyperus esculentus</i> L.), common pokeweed (<i>Phytolacca decandra</i> L.), barnyardgrass (<i>Echinochloa crus-galli</i> L.), dandelion (<i>Taraxacum officinale</i> (Weber)), and redroot pigweed (<i>Amaranthus retroflexus</i> L.) were tested using different rates of four carbon sources: molasses, wheat bran, mustard greens biomass, and raw chicken manure. Wheat bran was the most effective carbon source for inactivation of all weed propagules, followed by molasses and mustard greens biomass. Carbon sources were mixed with soil, which was irrigated to saturation and covered with plastic to promote anaerobic conditions for three weeks. Chicken manure inactivated all the tested species except <i>A. retroflexus</i> compared to the anaerobic control. Rates of carbon sources applied in soil were weakly but significantly correlated (<i>r</i> > 0.42 and <i>p</i> < 0.04) with weed seed mortality or germination inhibition (<i>E. crus-galli</i>) for all the tested carbon sources and weed species except for chicken manure for <i>C. album</i>, <i>A. retroflexus</i>, and <i>S. nigrum</i>. Laboratory tests to confirm organic acid toxicity showed that 1000 µL L<sup>−1</sup> acetic plus 1000 µL L<sup>−1</sup> butyric acids for at least 60 h inhibited of sprouting of <i>C. esculentus</i> tubers and <i>E. crusgalli</i> seeds, whereas 120 h or exposure was required to inhibit <i>C. album</i> seed germination. Anaerobic soil disinfestation effectively suppressed weed seed germination and viability when wheat bran, molasses and mustard greens biomass were used as carbon sources. This approach could be adopted for weed management in organic systems or any farming system where priority is given to environmentally sustainable practices.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/12/3147biosolarizationASDorganic weed managementbiological soil disinfestationreductive soil disinfestationorganic production
spellingShingle Ram B. Khadka
Andres D. Sanabria-Velazquez
John Cardina
Sally A. Miller
Evaluation of Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation for Environmentally Sustainable Weed Management
Agronomy
biosolarization
ASD
organic weed management
biological soil disinfestation
reductive soil disinfestation
organic production
title Evaluation of Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation for Environmentally Sustainable Weed Management
title_full Evaluation of Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation for Environmentally Sustainable Weed Management
title_fullStr Evaluation of Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation for Environmentally Sustainable Weed Management
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation for Environmentally Sustainable Weed Management
title_short Evaluation of Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation for Environmentally Sustainable Weed Management
title_sort evaluation of anaerobic soil disinfestation for environmentally sustainable weed management
topic biosolarization
ASD
organic weed management
biological soil disinfestation
reductive soil disinfestation
organic production
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/12/3147
work_keys_str_mv AT rambkhadka evaluationofanaerobicsoildisinfestationforenvironmentallysustainableweedmanagement
AT andresdsanabriavelazquez evaluationofanaerobicsoildisinfestationforenvironmentallysustainableweedmanagement
AT johncardina evaluationofanaerobicsoildisinfestationforenvironmentallysustainableweedmanagement
AT sallyamiller evaluationofanaerobicsoildisinfestationforenvironmentallysustainableweedmanagement