Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach

Background Current thermal ablation methods for atrial fibrillation, including radiofrequency and cryoablation, have a suboptimal success rate. To avoid pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis, ablation is performed outside of the PV, despite the importance of triggers inside the vein. We previously reported o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chance M. Witt, Alan Sugrue, Deepak Padmanabhan, Vaibhav Vaidya, Sarah Gruba, James Rohl, Christopher V. DeSimone, Ammar M. Killu, Niyada Naksuk, Joanne Pederson, Scott Suddendorf, Dorothy J. Ladewig, Elad Maor, David R. Holmes, Suraj Kapa, Samuel J. Asirvatham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-07-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.009575
_version_ 1811332369265721344
author Chance M. Witt
Alan Sugrue
Deepak Padmanabhan
Vaibhav Vaidya
Sarah Gruba
James Rohl
Christopher V. DeSimone
Ammar M. Killu
Niyada Naksuk
Joanne Pederson
Scott Suddendorf
Dorothy J. Ladewig
Elad Maor
David R. Holmes
Suraj Kapa
Samuel J. Asirvatham
author_facet Chance M. Witt
Alan Sugrue
Deepak Padmanabhan
Vaibhav Vaidya
Sarah Gruba
James Rohl
Christopher V. DeSimone
Ammar M. Killu
Niyada Naksuk
Joanne Pederson
Scott Suddendorf
Dorothy J. Ladewig
Elad Maor
David R. Holmes
Suraj Kapa
Samuel J. Asirvatham
author_sort Chance M. Witt
collection DOAJ
description Background Current thermal ablation methods for atrial fibrillation, including radiofrequency and cryoablation, have a suboptimal success rate. To avoid pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis, ablation is performed outside of the PV, despite the importance of triggers inside the vein. We previously reported on the acute effects of a novel direct current electroporation approach with a balloon catheter to create lesions inside the PVs in addition to the antrum. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the effects created by this nonthermal ablation method were associated with irreversible lesions and whether PV stenosis or other adverse effects occurred after a survival period. Methods and Results Initial and survival studies were performed in 5 canines. At the initial study, the balloon catheter was inflated to contact the antrum and interior of the PV. Direct current energy was delivered between 2 electrodes on the catheter in ECG‐gated 100 μs pulses. A total of 10 PVs were treated demonstrating significant acute local electrogram diminution (mean amplitude decrease of 61.2±19.8%). After the survival period (mean 27 days), computed tomography imaging showed no PV stenosis. On histologic evaluation, transmural, although not circumferential, lesions were seen in each treated vein. No PV stenosis or esophageal injury was present. Conclusions Irreversible, transmural lesions can be created inside the PV without evidence of stenosis after a 27‐day survival period using this balloon‐based direct current ablation approach. These early data show promise for an ablation approach that could directly treat PV triggers in addition to traditional PV antrum ablation.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:35:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a91b89aafd94f22829a0ddbeb1f83a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:35:50Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-0a91b89aafd94f22829a0ddbeb1f83a32022-12-22T02:39:26ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802018-07-0171410.1161/JAHA.118.009575Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation ApproachChance M. Witt0Alan Sugrue1Deepak Padmanabhan2Vaibhav Vaidya3Sarah Gruba4James Rohl5Christopher V. DeSimone6Ammar M. Killu7Niyada Naksuk8Joanne Pederson9Scott Suddendorf10Dorothy J. Ladewig11Elad Maor12David R. Holmes13Suraj Kapa14Samuel J. Asirvatham15Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNBoston Scientific St. Paul MNBoston Scientific St. Paul MNDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDivision of Surgery Research Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDivision of Surgery Research Mayo Clinic Rochester MNMayo Clinic Ventures Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MNBackground Current thermal ablation methods for atrial fibrillation, including radiofrequency and cryoablation, have a suboptimal success rate. To avoid pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis, ablation is performed outside of the PV, despite the importance of triggers inside the vein. We previously reported on the acute effects of a novel direct current electroporation approach with a balloon catheter to create lesions inside the PVs in addition to the antrum. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the effects created by this nonthermal ablation method were associated with irreversible lesions and whether PV stenosis or other adverse effects occurred after a survival period. Methods and Results Initial and survival studies were performed in 5 canines. At the initial study, the balloon catheter was inflated to contact the antrum and interior of the PV. Direct current energy was delivered between 2 electrodes on the catheter in ECG‐gated 100 μs pulses. A total of 10 PVs were treated demonstrating significant acute local electrogram diminution (mean amplitude decrease of 61.2±19.8%). After the survival period (mean 27 days), computed tomography imaging showed no PV stenosis. On histologic evaluation, transmural, although not circumferential, lesions were seen in each treated vein. No PV stenosis or esophageal injury was present. Conclusions Irreversible, transmural lesions can be created inside the PV without evidence of stenosis after a 27‐day survival period using this balloon‐based direct current ablation approach. These early data show promise for an ablation approach that could directly treat PV triggers in addition to traditional PV antrum ablation.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.009575animal studyatrial fibrillationdirect current ablationelectroporationpulmonary vein stenosis
spellingShingle Chance M. Witt
Alan Sugrue
Deepak Padmanabhan
Vaibhav Vaidya
Sarah Gruba
James Rohl
Christopher V. DeSimone
Ammar M. Killu
Niyada Naksuk
Joanne Pederson
Scott Suddendorf
Dorothy J. Ladewig
Elad Maor
David R. Holmes
Suraj Kapa
Samuel J. Asirvatham
Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
animal study
atrial fibrillation
direct current ablation
electroporation
pulmonary vein stenosis
title Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title_full Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title_fullStr Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title_full_unstemmed Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title_short Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title_sort intrapulmonary vein ablation without stenosis a novel balloon based direct current electroporation approach
topic animal study
atrial fibrillation
direct current ablation
electroporation
pulmonary vein stenosis
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.009575
work_keys_str_mv AT chancemwitt intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT alansugrue intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT deepakpadmanabhan intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT vaibhavvaidya intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT sarahgruba intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT jamesrohl intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT christophervdesimone intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT ammarmkillu intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT niyadanaksuk intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT joannepederson intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT scottsuddendorf intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT dorothyjladewig intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT eladmaor intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT davidrholmes intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT surajkapa intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT samueljasirvatham intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach