Digestive jurisprudence restated: On breakfast and digestion as bias-arousers
Digestive Jurisprudence" is the view that judicial decisions depend on what judges had for breakfast. The view is usually associated with Frank's version of Legal Realism. The paper shows that, disputable as it is, that view comes from the philosophical background of Peirce's pragmati...
Main Author: | Tuzet Giovanni |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2023/0003-25652303417T.pdf |
Similar Items
-
The Impact of rhetoric on Jerome Frank's "Digestive jurisprudence"
by: Avramović Dragutin, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
LIABILITY, PRAGMATISM AND ECONOMICS
by: Giovanni Tuzet
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Between Jurisprudence and Grammar: Old Trends and Modern Visions
by: Khaled Al Kindi
Published: (2016-12-01) -
The impact of legal science on contemporary jurisprudence research
by: Youssouf Mouatsi
Published: (2019-06-01) -
The Term Species in Justinian’s Digest
by: Edward Mussawir
Published: (2022-08-01)