Quantifying Compassion Fatigue in Ancillary and Clinical Staff in an Adult Emergency Department

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) staff are at a high risk for compassion fatigue (CF) due to a work environment that combines high patient acuity, violence, and other workplace stressors. This multifaceted syndrome has wide-ranging impacts which, if left untreated, can lead to adverse mental...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa Bales, Katelyn DeAlmeida, Courtney E. Oei, David Hampton, Nicole L. Bohr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2022-10-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/63v31417
_version_ 1828283576014077952
author Melissa Bales
Katelyn DeAlmeida
Courtney E. Oei
David Hampton
Nicole L. Bohr
author_facet Melissa Bales
Katelyn DeAlmeida
Courtney E. Oei
David Hampton
Nicole L. Bohr
author_sort Melissa Bales
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Emergency department (ED) staff are at a high risk for compassion fatigue (CF) due to a work environment that combines high patient acuity, violence, and other workplace stressors. This multifaceted syndrome has wide-ranging impacts which, if left untreated, can lead to adverse mental health conditions including depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders. However, the majority of studies examining CF look solely at clinicians; as a result, there is little information on the impact of CF across other roles involved in supporting patient care. We conducted this study to establish the prevalence of CF across both clinical and non-clinical roles in the adult ED setting. Methods: For this single institution, cross-sectional study, all full- and part-time ED staff members who worked at least 50% of their shifts in the ED or within the adult trauma service line were eligible to participate. Using the Professional Quality of Life Scale, which measures CF via compassion satisfaction (CS), burnout (BO), and secondary traumatic stress (STS), we assessed for group differences between roles using non-parametric one-way ANOVA. Results: A total of 152 participants (response rate = 38.0%) completed the survey. This included attending physicians (n = 15, 9.7%), resident/fellow physicians (n = 23, 15.1%), staff nurses (n = 54, 35.5%), emergency technicians (n = 21, 13.8%), supportive clinical staff (n = 28, 18.4%), and supportive ancillary staff (n = 11, 7.2%). Across all roles, the majority of respondents had average levels of BO (median = 25.0, interquartile range [IQR] 20.0–29.0) and STS (median = 23.0, IQR 18.0–27.0) coupled with high levels of CS (median = 38.0, IQR 33.0–43.0). There was a difference in CS by role (P = .01), with nurses reporting lower CS than attending physicians. Secondary traumatic stress also differed by role (P = .01), with attending physicians reporting lower STS than both emergency technicians and nurses. Group differences were not seen in BO. Conclusions: Rates of compassion fatigue subcomponents were similar across all ED team members, including non-clinical staff. Programs to identify and mitigate CF should be implemented and extended to all roles within the ED.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T08:47:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a9c24baa1b1422e88068598c7917faa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1936-9018
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T08:47:20Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-0a9c24baa1b1422e88068598c7917faa2022-12-22T02:53:38ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-90182022-10-0123610.5811/westjem.2022.8.57733wjem-23-841Quantifying Compassion Fatigue in Ancillary and Clinical Staff in an Adult Emergency DepartmentMelissa BalesKatelyn DeAlmeidaCourtney E. OeiDavid HamptonNicole L. BohrIntroduction: Emergency department (ED) staff are at a high risk for compassion fatigue (CF) due to a work environment that combines high patient acuity, violence, and other workplace stressors. This multifaceted syndrome has wide-ranging impacts which, if left untreated, can lead to adverse mental health conditions including depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders. However, the majority of studies examining CF look solely at clinicians; as a result, there is little information on the impact of CF across other roles involved in supporting patient care. We conducted this study to establish the prevalence of CF across both clinical and non-clinical roles in the adult ED setting. Methods: For this single institution, cross-sectional study, all full- and part-time ED staff members who worked at least 50% of their shifts in the ED or within the adult trauma service line were eligible to participate. Using the Professional Quality of Life Scale, which measures CF via compassion satisfaction (CS), burnout (BO), and secondary traumatic stress (STS), we assessed for group differences between roles using non-parametric one-way ANOVA. Results: A total of 152 participants (response rate = 38.0%) completed the survey. This included attending physicians (n = 15, 9.7%), resident/fellow physicians (n = 23, 15.1%), staff nurses (n = 54, 35.5%), emergency technicians (n = 21, 13.8%), supportive clinical staff (n = 28, 18.4%), and supportive ancillary staff (n = 11, 7.2%). Across all roles, the majority of respondents had average levels of BO (median = 25.0, interquartile range [IQR] 20.0–29.0) and STS (median = 23.0, IQR 18.0–27.0) coupled with high levels of CS (median = 38.0, IQR 33.0–43.0). There was a difference in CS by role (P = .01), with nurses reporting lower CS than attending physicians. Secondary traumatic stress also differed by role (P = .01), with attending physicians reporting lower STS than both emergency technicians and nurses. Group differences were not seen in BO. Conclusions: Rates of compassion fatigue subcomponents were similar across all ED team members, including non-clinical staff. Programs to identify and mitigate CF should be implemented and extended to all roles within the ED.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/63v31417
spellingShingle Melissa Bales
Katelyn DeAlmeida
Courtney E. Oei
David Hampton
Nicole L. Bohr
Quantifying Compassion Fatigue in Ancillary and Clinical Staff in an Adult Emergency Department
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
title Quantifying Compassion Fatigue in Ancillary and Clinical Staff in an Adult Emergency Department
title_full Quantifying Compassion Fatigue in Ancillary and Clinical Staff in an Adult Emergency Department
title_fullStr Quantifying Compassion Fatigue in Ancillary and Clinical Staff in an Adult Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Compassion Fatigue in Ancillary and Clinical Staff in an Adult Emergency Department
title_short Quantifying Compassion Fatigue in Ancillary and Clinical Staff in an Adult Emergency Department
title_sort quantifying compassion fatigue in ancillary and clinical staff in an adult emergency department
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/63v31417
work_keys_str_mv AT melissabales quantifyingcompassionfatigueinancillaryandclinicalstaffinanadultemergencydepartment
AT katelyndealmeida quantifyingcompassionfatigueinancillaryandclinicalstaffinanadultemergencydepartment
AT courtneyeoei quantifyingcompassionfatigueinancillaryandclinicalstaffinanadultemergencydepartment
AT davidhampton quantifyingcompassionfatigueinancillaryandclinicalstaffinanadultemergencydepartment
AT nicolelbohr quantifyingcompassionfatigueinancillaryandclinicalstaffinanadultemergencydepartment