Estimating the false discovery risk of (randomized) clinical trials in medical journals based on published p-values
The influential claim that most published results are false raised concerns about the trustworthiness and integrity of science. Since then, there have been numerous attempts to examine the rate of false-positive results that have failed to settle this question empirically. Here we propose a new way...
Main Authors: | Ulrich Schimmack, František Bartoš |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468063/?tool=EBI |
Similar Items
-
Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals
by: Chen, Y, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
by: Andreas Schneck
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals.
by: Clarke, M, et al.
Published: (2002) -
Randomized trials published in Chinese or Western journals: comparative empirical analysis.
by: Purgato, M, et al.
Published: (2012) -
A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate
by: Guanying Wu, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)