Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Two Toric Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses

Abstract Introduction To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of two toric presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods Non-randomized prospective comparative study including 86 eyes of 51 patients (age 43–83 years) that underwent cataract surgery with implantation of one of the fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krešimir Gabrić, Nikica Gabrić, David P. Piñero, Ivan Gabrić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2024-01-01
Series:Ophthalmology and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00878-8
_version_ 1797275593052520448
author Krešimir Gabrić
Nikica Gabrić
David P. Piñero
Ivan Gabrić
author_facet Krešimir Gabrić
Nikica Gabrić
David P. Piñero
Ivan Gabrić
author_sort Krešimir Gabrić
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of two toric presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods Non-randomized prospective comparative study including 86 eyes of 51 patients (age 43–83 years) that underwent cataract surgery with implantation of one of the following two IOLs: TECNIS Toric Synergy (Johnson & Johnson Vision) (Synergy group) or AT LISA tri toric 939MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec) (ATLISA group). Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. Results At 6 months after surgery, all eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity 20/25 or better in both groups, whereas 96.2% and 100% of eyes achieved uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) 20/25 or better in the ATLISA and Synergy groups, respectively. All eyes achieved postoperative mesopic UNVA 20/30 or better in both IOL groups; 96.2% and 100% of eyes had a manifest cylinder ≤ 0.50 D at 6 months in ATLISA and Synergy groups, respectively. Mean magnitude of error was 0.04 ± 0.20 and − 0.04 ± 0.09 D in ATLISA and Synergy groups, respectively (p = 0.05). In the defocus curve, significant differences were found between IOL groups for most of distance-corrected visual acuities, except those corresponding to defocus of 0 D (p = 0.268) and − 1 D (p = 0.361). Conclusions The two toric presbyopia-correcting IOLs evaluated provide an efficacious astigmatic correction combined with a successful distance, intermediate and near visual rehabilitation. The visual performance seems to be better for most visual demands with the TECNIS Toric Synergy IOL, especially for distances closer than 40 cm.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:15:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0abb03a9bdaa456b8ebd174961521ef5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2193-8245
2193-6528
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:15:43Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
record_format Article
series Ophthalmology and Therapy
spelling doaj.art-0abb03a9bdaa456b8ebd174961521ef52024-03-05T17:54:00ZengAdis, Springer HealthcareOphthalmology and Therapy2193-82452193-65282024-01-0113377579010.1007/s40123-023-00878-8Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Two Toric Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular LensesKrešimir Gabrić0Nikica Gabrić1David P. Piñero2Ivan Gabrić3University Eye Clinic SvjetlostUniversity Eye Clinic SvjetlostDepartment of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of AlicanteUniversity Eye Clinic SvjetlostAbstract Introduction To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of two toric presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods Non-randomized prospective comparative study including 86 eyes of 51 patients (age 43–83 years) that underwent cataract surgery with implantation of one of the following two IOLs: TECNIS Toric Synergy (Johnson & Johnson Vision) (Synergy group) or AT LISA tri toric 939MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec) (ATLISA group). Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. Results At 6 months after surgery, all eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity 20/25 or better in both groups, whereas 96.2% and 100% of eyes achieved uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) 20/25 or better in the ATLISA and Synergy groups, respectively. All eyes achieved postoperative mesopic UNVA 20/30 or better in both IOL groups; 96.2% and 100% of eyes had a manifest cylinder ≤ 0.50 D at 6 months in ATLISA and Synergy groups, respectively. Mean magnitude of error was 0.04 ± 0.20 and − 0.04 ± 0.09 D in ATLISA and Synergy groups, respectively (p = 0.05). In the defocus curve, significant differences were found between IOL groups for most of distance-corrected visual acuities, except those corresponding to defocus of 0 D (p = 0.268) and − 1 D (p = 0.361). Conclusions The two toric presbyopia-correcting IOLs evaluated provide an efficacious astigmatic correction combined with a successful distance, intermediate and near visual rehabilitation. The visual performance seems to be better for most visual demands with the TECNIS Toric Synergy IOL, especially for distances closer than 40 cm.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00878-8Cataract surgeryDiffractive IOLMultifocal IOLNear visual acuity
spellingShingle Krešimir Gabrić
Nikica Gabrić
David P. Piñero
Ivan Gabrić
Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Two Toric Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Cataract surgery
Diffractive IOL
Multifocal IOL
Near visual acuity
title Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Two Toric Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses
title_full Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Two Toric Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Two Toric Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Two Toric Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses
title_short Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Two Toric Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses
title_sort comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes of two toric presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses
topic Cataract surgery
Diffractive IOL
Multifocal IOL
Near visual acuity
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00878-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kresimirgabric comparativeanalysisoftheclinicaloutcomesoftwotoricpresbyopiacorrectingintraocularlenses
AT nikicagabric comparativeanalysisoftheclinicaloutcomesoftwotoricpresbyopiacorrectingintraocularlenses
AT davidppinero comparativeanalysisoftheclinicaloutcomesoftwotoricpresbyopiacorrectingintraocularlenses
AT ivangabric comparativeanalysisoftheclinicaloutcomesoftwotoricpresbyopiacorrectingintraocularlenses