What Influences Farmer’s Adoption Lag for Soil and Water Conservation Practices? Evidence from Sio-Malaba Malakisi River Basin of Kenya and Uganda Borders
Agricultural intensification and expansion efforts aimed at feeding increasing populations have led to soil degradation globally. Due to their suitability for resource-constrained farmers, and potential positive impacts on agricultural land improvement, Soil and Water Conservation Practices (SWCPs)...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Agronomy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/10/1985 |
_version_ | 1797515544421728256 |
---|---|
author | Hyacinthe Nyirahabimana Alice Turinawe Jakob Lederer Jeninah Karungi Mathew Herrnegger |
author_facet | Hyacinthe Nyirahabimana Alice Turinawe Jakob Lederer Jeninah Karungi Mathew Herrnegger |
author_sort | Hyacinthe Nyirahabimana |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Agricultural intensification and expansion efforts aimed at feeding increasing populations have led to soil degradation globally. Due to their suitability for resource-constrained farmers, and potential positive impacts on agricultural land improvement, Soil and Water Conservation Practices (SWCPs) are recommended as a solution to soil degradation in Sub Saharan Africa (SSA). However, the adoption rates of SWCPs are low and farmers who adopt them do not adopt on time. There is a lag between the time when farmers first learn about SWCPs and the time of adoption. This study examines the factors influencing adoption lag for Soil and Water Conservation Practices among smallholder farmers in the Sio-Malaba Malakisi River Basin border region of Kenya and Uganda. We utilize data collected from 506 randomly selected households and use the duration analysis model to analyze the data. Results show that the average adoption lag of SWCPs in the study area was about 10 years. Further, reduction in adoption lag is associated with household size, number of accessible markets, access to credit, age of the household head, farm size owned, and tropical livestock units. On the other hand, access to off-farm income and household location in Uganda are associated with increased adoption lag of SWCPs. Participation in social groups, households being male-headed, and education of the household head showed mixed effects on adoption lag, depending on the SWCP of focus. Strengthening farmer social networks and access to credit and markets are recommended as possible interventions to promote the timely adoption of SWCPs. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T06:46:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0ad987f08ec9496db43bc324371589b1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-4395 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T06:46:54Z |
publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Agronomy |
spelling | doaj.art-0ad987f08ec9496db43bc324371589b12023-11-22T17:06:26ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952021-09-011110198510.3390/agronomy11101985What Influences Farmer’s Adoption Lag for Soil and Water Conservation Practices? Evidence from Sio-Malaba Malakisi River Basin of Kenya and Uganda BordersHyacinthe Nyirahabimana0Alice Turinawe1Jakob Lederer2Jeninah Karungi3Mathew Herrnegger4Department of Agribusiness and Natural Resource Economics, School of Agricultural Sciences, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, UgandaDepartment of Agribusiness and Natural Resource Economics, School of Agricultural Sciences, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, UgandaInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Technische Universität Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Agricultural Production, School of Agricultural Sciences, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, UgandaInstitute for Hydrology and Water Management, University of Natura Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, AustriaAgricultural intensification and expansion efforts aimed at feeding increasing populations have led to soil degradation globally. Due to their suitability for resource-constrained farmers, and potential positive impacts on agricultural land improvement, Soil and Water Conservation Practices (SWCPs) are recommended as a solution to soil degradation in Sub Saharan Africa (SSA). However, the adoption rates of SWCPs are low and farmers who adopt them do not adopt on time. There is a lag between the time when farmers first learn about SWCPs and the time of adoption. This study examines the factors influencing adoption lag for Soil and Water Conservation Practices among smallholder farmers in the Sio-Malaba Malakisi River Basin border region of Kenya and Uganda. We utilize data collected from 506 randomly selected households and use the duration analysis model to analyze the data. Results show that the average adoption lag of SWCPs in the study area was about 10 years. Further, reduction in adoption lag is associated with household size, number of accessible markets, access to credit, age of the household head, farm size owned, and tropical livestock units. On the other hand, access to off-farm income and household location in Uganda are associated with increased adoption lag of SWCPs. Participation in social groups, households being male-headed, and education of the household head showed mixed effects on adoption lag, depending on the SWCP of focus. Strengthening farmer social networks and access to credit and markets are recommended as possible interventions to promote the timely adoption of SWCPs.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/10/1985soil and water conservation practicesadoption lagsoil losserosionduration model |
spellingShingle | Hyacinthe Nyirahabimana Alice Turinawe Jakob Lederer Jeninah Karungi Mathew Herrnegger What Influences Farmer’s Adoption Lag for Soil and Water Conservation Practices? Evidence from Sio-Malaba Malakisi River Basin of Kenya and Uganda Borders Agronomy soil and water conservation practices adoption lag soil loss erosion duration model |
title | What Influences Farmer’s Adoption Lag for Soil and Water Conservation Practices? Evidence from Sio-Malaba Malakisi River Basin of Kenya and Uganda Borders |
title_full | What Influences Farmer’s Adoption Lag for Soil and Water Conservation Practices? Evidence from Sio-Malaba Malakisi River Basin of Kenya and Uganda Borders |
title_fullStr | What Influences Farmer’s Adoption Lag for Soil and Water Conservation Practices? Evidence from Sio-Malaba Malakisi River Basin of Kenya and Uganda Borders |
title_full_unstemmed | What Influences Farmer’s Adoption Lag for Soil and Water Conservation Practices? Evidence from Sio-Malaba Malakisi River Basin of Kenya and Uganda Borders |
title_short | What Influences Farmer’s Adoption Lag for Soil and Water Conservation Practices? Evidence from Sio-Malaba Malakisi River Basin of Kenya and Uganda Borders |
title_sort | what influences farmer s adoption lag for soil and water conservation practices evidence from sio malaba malakisi river basin of kenya and uganda borders |
topic | soil and water conservation practices adoption lag soil loss erosion duration model |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/10/1985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hyacinthenyirahabimana whatinfluencesfarmersadoptionlagforsoilandwaterconservationpracticesevidencefromsiomalabamalakisiriverbasinofkenyaandugandaborders AT aliceturinawe whatinfluencesfarmersadoptionlagforsoilandwaterconservationpracticesevidencefromsiomalabamalakisiriverbasinofkenyaandugandaborders AT jakoblederer whatinfluencesfarmersadoptionlagforsoilandwaterconservationpracticesevidencefromsiomalabamalakisiriverbasinofkenyaandugandaborders AT jeninahkarungi whatinfluencesfarmersadoptionlagforsoilandwaterconservationpracticesevidencefromsiomalabamalakisiriverbasinofkenyaandugandaborders AT mathewherrnegger whatinfluencesfarmersadoptionlagforsoilandwaterconservationpracticesevidencefromsiomalabamalakisiriverbasinofkenyaandugandaborders |