A Response to Brian Welter’s Review of Peter Redpath’s The Moral Psychology of St. Thomas: An Introduction to Ragamuffin Ethics
The main purpose of this response is twofold, to: (1) acknowledge and elaborate on aspects of Welter’s review that highlight key points in Redpath’s book, and (2) make some precisions and amplifications so that both authors can be better appreciated for what they offer in their works to contemporary...
Main Author: | Marvin Peláez |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Étienne Gilson Society
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Studia Gilsoniana |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.gilsonsociety.com/files/373-389-Pelaez.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Peter A. Redpath, The Moral Psychology of St. Thomas Aquinas: An Introduction to Ragamuffin Ethics
by: Brian Welter
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Peter Redpath’s Philosophy of History
by: Curtis L. Hancock
Published: (2016-03-01) -
Brian Davies on the Problem of Evil: A Critical Study
by: Zolfaghar Naseri, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Managing failure: Sir Peter Brian Medawar’s transplantation research
by: Park, Hyung Wook
Published: (2018) -
The Thomistic Dissolution of the Logical Problem of Evil
by: Edward Feser
Published: (2021-04-01)