High-stakes hedges are misunderstood too. A commentary on: “Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference”
Frederick, Levis, Malliaris and Meyer (2018) report a package of laboratory studies where participants underestimate the value of “hedges”: Risky bets which cancel out the risk of another presently-held bet. However, it might be questioned to what extent laboratory findings predict field behavior. P...
Main Authors: | Philip W. S. Newall, Dominic Cortis |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190710/jdm190710.pdf |
Similar Items
-
High-stakes hedges are misunderstood too. A commentary on: “Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference”
by: Philip W. S. Newall, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Hedging on Betting Markets
by: Gustav Axén, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Valuing bets and
hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference
by: Shane Frederick, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Valuing bets and
hedges
by: Subimal Chatterjee, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference
by: Shane Frederick, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01)