A systematic review of general surgery robotic training curriculums
Background: As of the most recent surveys of resident programs in 2018, only slightly more than half of programs have formal robotic training curriculums implemented. Fewer programs have further assessed their own curriculum and its benefit. Method: We conducted a PubMed/MEDLINE literature search fo...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023-09-01
|
| Series: | Heliyon |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402306468X |
| _version_ | 1797669878522445824 |
|---|---|
| author | Haydee Del Calvo Min P. Kim Ray Chihara Edward Y. Chan |
| author_facet | Haydee Del Calvo Min P. Kim Ray Chihara Edward Y. Chan |
| author_sort | Haydee Del Calvo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: As of the most recent surveys of resident programs in 2018, only slightly more than half of programs have formal robotic training curriculums implemented. Fewer programs have further assessed their own curriculum and its benefit. Method: We conducted a PubMed/MEDLINE literature search for robotic surgery curriculums and those that had assessment of their programs. Results: A total of 11 studies were reviewed. When reviewed in chronological order, there has been a progression towards more robotic specific objective data analysis as opposed to subjective surveying. There is a wide variation in curriculums, but simulation use is pervasive. Conclusions: Our review makes evident two important concepts-there is great variety in training curriculums and there is great benefit in implementation. The importance is in establishment of what makes resident training effective and supports the adaptable and successful surgeon. This may come from an adaptable curriculum but a structured test-out assessment. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T20:51:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0b0f6945bdfe494eb2a3463a827f43a1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2405-8440 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T20:51:11Z |
| publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Heliyon |
| spelling | doaj.art-0b0f6945bdfe494eb2a3463a827f43a12023-10-01T05:58:59ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-09-0199e19260A systematic review of general surgery robotic training curriculumsHaydee Del Calvo0Min P. Kim1Ray Chihara2Edward Y. Chan3Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USADivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Surgery and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USADivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Surgery and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USADivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Surgery and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA; Corresponding author. 6550 Fannin Street, Suite 1661, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.Background: As of the most recent surveys of resident programs in 2018, only slightly more than half of programs have formal robotic training curriculums implemented. Fewer programs have further assessed their own curriculum and its benefit. Method: We conducted a PubMed/MEDLINE literature search for robotic surgery curriculums and those that had assessment of their programs. Results: A total of 11 studies were reviewed. When reviewed in chronological order, there has been a progression towards more robotic specific objective data analysis as opposed to subjective surveying. There is a wide variation in curriculums, but simulation use is pervasive. Conclusions: Our review makes evident two important concepts-there is great variety in training curriculums and there is great benefit in implementation. The importance is in establishment of what makes resident training effective and supports the adaptable and successful surgeon. This may come from an adaptable curriculum but a structured test-out assessment.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402306468XRobotic surgeryResident curriculumCurriculum assessmentSystematic review |
| spellingShingle | Haydee Del Calvo Min P. Kim Ray Chihara Edward Y. Chan A systematic review of general surgery robotic training curriculums Heliyon Robotic surgery Resident curriculum Curriculum assessment Systematic review |
| title | A systematic review of general surgery robotic training curriculums |
| title_full | A systematic review of general surgery robotic training curriculums |
| title_fullStr | A systematic review of general surgery robotic training curriculums |
| title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of general surgery robotic training curriculums |
| title_short | A systematic review of general surgery robotic training curriculums |
| title_sort | systematic review of general surgery robotic training curriculums |
| topic | Robotic surgery Resident curriculum Curriculum assessment Systematic review |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402306468X |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT haydeedelcalvo asystematicreviewofgeneralsurgeryrobotictrainingcurriculums AT minpkim asystematicreviewofgeneralsurgeryrobotictrainingcurriculums AT raychihara asystematicreviewofgeneralsurgeryrobotictrainingcurriculums AT edwardychan asystematicreviewofgeneralsurgeryrobotictrainingcurriculums AT haydeedelcalvo systematicreviewofgeneralsurgeryrobotictrainingcurriculums AT minpkim systematicreviewofgeneralsurgeryrobotictrainingcurriculums AT raychihara systematicreviewofgeneralsurgeryrobotictrainingcurriculums AT edwardychan systematicreviewofgeneralsurgeryrobotictrainingcurriculums |