Choice-justifications after allocating resources in helping dilemmas
How do donors reason and justify their choices when faced with dilemmas in a charitable context? In two studies, Swedish students were confronted with helping dilemmas based on the identifiable victim effect, the proportion dominance effect and the ingroup effect. Each dilemma consisted of two compa...
Main Authors: | Arvid Erlandsson, Fredrik Björklund, Martin Bäckström |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15410/jdm15410.pdf |
Similar Items
-
How far is the
suffering? The role of psychological distance and victims’ identifiability in
donation decisions
by: Tehila Kogut, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Seven (weak and
strong) helping effects systematically tested in separate evaluation, joint
evaluation and forced choice
by: Arvid Erlandsson
Published: (2021-09-01) -
The influence of
identifiability and singularity in moral decision making
by: Johanna Wiss, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
Seven (weak and strong) helping effects systematically tested in separate evaluation, joint evaluation and forced choice
by: Arvid Erlandsson
Published: (2021-09-01) -
The influence of identifiability and singularity in moral decision making
by: Johanna Wiss, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01)