Hybrid Three-Phase Rectifiers with Active Power Factor Correction: A Systematic Review
The hybrid three-phase rectifiers (HTR) consist of parallel associations of two rectifiers (rectifier 1 and rectifier 2), each one of them with a distinct operation, while the sum of their input currents forms a sinusoidal or multilevel waveform. In general, rectifier 1 is a GRAETZ (full bridge) (ca...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Electronics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/13/1520 |
| _version_ | 1797528996022321152 |
|---|---|
| author | José Teixeira Gonçalves Stanimir Valtchev Rui Melicio Alcides Gonçalves Frede Blaabjerg |
| author_facet | José Teixeira Gonçalves Stanimir Valtchev Rui Melicio Alcides Gonçalves Frede Blaabjerg |
| author_sort | José Teixeira Gonçalves |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The hybrid three-phase rectifiers (HTR) consist of parallel associations of two rectifiers (rectifier 1 and rectifier 2), each one of them with a distinct operation, while the sum of their input currents forms a sinusoidal or multilevel waveform. In general, rectifier 1 is a GRAETZ (full bridge) (can be combined with a BOOST converter) and rectifier 2 is combined with a DC-DC converter. In this HTR contest, this paper is intended to answer some important questions about those hybrid rectifiers. To obtain the correct answers, the study is conducted as an analysis of a systematic literature review. Thus, a search was carried out in the databases, mostly IEEE and IET, and 34 papers were selected as the best corresponding to the HTR theme. It is observed that the preferred form of power distribution in unidirectional hybrid three-phase rectifiers (UHTR) is <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>55</mn><mo>%</mo><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> (rectifier 1) and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>45</mn><mo>%</mo><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> (rectifier 2). For the bidirectional hybrid three-phase rectifiers (BHTR), rectifier 1 preferably takes <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>90</mn><mrow><mo>%</mo><mtext> </mtext><mi>of</mi><mtext> </mtext></mrow><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>%</mo><mtext> </mtext><mi>of</mi><mtext> </mtext></mrow><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> is processed by rectifier 2. It is also observed that the UHTR that employ the single-ended primary-inductor converter (SEPIC) or VIENNA converter topologies in rectifier 2 can present sinusoidal input currents with low total harmonic distortion (THD) and high Power Factor (PF), even successfully complying with the international standards. The same can be said about the rectifier that employs a pulse-width (PWM) converter of BOOST topology in rectifier 2. In short, the HTR are interesting because they allow using the GRAETZ full bridge topology in rectifier 1, thus taking advantage of its characteristics, being simple, robust, and reliable. At the same time, the advantages of rectifier 2, i.e., high PF and low THD, are well used. In addition, this article also points out the future direction of research that is still unexplored in the literature, thus giving opportunities for future innovation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T10:07:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0b18e1d6178f449c92e1af797ea0dedd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2079-9292 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T10:07:10Z |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Electronics |
| spelling | doaj.art-0b18e1d6178f449c92e1af797ea0dedd2023-11-22T01:25:52ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922021-06-011013152010.3390/electronics10131520Hybrid Three-Phase Rectifiers with Active Power Factor Correction: A Systematic ReviewJosé Teixeira Gonçalves0Stanimir Valtchev1Rui Melicio2Alcides Gonçalves3Frede Blaabjerg4Departamento de Engenharia Eletrotécnica e de Computadores, CTS/UNINOVA, FCT, FCT Campus Caparica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, FCT Campus Caparica, 2829-516 Monte Caparica, PortugalDepartamento de Engenharia Eletrotécnica e de Computadores, CTS/UNINOVA, FCT, FCT Campus Caparica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, FCT Campus Caparica, 2829-516 Monte Caparica, PortugalInstituto de Engenharia Mecânica (IDMEC), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, PortugalDepartamento de Engenharia Eletrotécnica e de Computadores, CTS/UNINOVA, FCT, FCT Campus Caparica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, FCT Campus Caparica, 2829-516 Monte Caparica, PortugalDepartment of Energy Technology, University of Aalborg, Pontoppidanstræde 111, 9220 Aalborg Øst, DenmarkThe hybrid three-phase rectifiers (HTR) consist of parallel associations of two rectifiers (rectifier 1 and rectifier 2), each one of them with a distinct operation, while the sum of their input currents forms a sinusoidal or multilevel waveform. In general, rectifier 1 is a GRAETZ (full bridge) (can be combined with a BOOST converter) and rectifier 2 is combined with a DC-DC converter. In this HTR contest, this paper is intended to answer some important questions about those hybrid rectifiers. To obtain the correct answers, the study is conducted as an analysis of a systematic literature review. Thus, a search was carried out in the databases, mostly IEEE and IET, and 34 papers were selected as the best corresponding to the HTR theme. It is observed that the preferred form of power distribution in unidirectional hybrid three-phase rectifiers (UHTR) is <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>55</mn><mo>%</mo><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> (rectifier 1) and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>45</mn><mo>%</mo><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> (rectifier 2). For the bidirectional hybrid three-phase rectifiers (BHTR), rectifier 1 preferably takes <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>90</mn><mrow><mo>%</mo><mtext> </mtext><mi>of</mi><mtext> </mtext></mrow><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>%</mo><mtext> </mtext><mi>of</mi><mtext> </mtext></mrow><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> is processed by rectifier 2. It is also observed that the UHTR that employ the single-ended primary-inductor converter (SEPIC) or VIENNA converter topologies in rectifier 2 can present sinusoidal input currents with low total harmonic distortion (THD) and high Power Factor (PF), even successfully complying with the international standards. The same can be said about the rectifier that employs a pulse-width (PWM) converter of BOOST topology in rectifier 2. In short, the HTR are interesting because they allow using the GRAETZ full bridge topology in rectifier 1, thus taking advantage of its characteristics, being simple, robust, and reliable. At the same time, the advantages of rectifier 2, i.e., high PF and low THD, are well used. In addition, this article also points out the future direction of research that is still unexplored in the literature, thus giving opportunities for future innovation.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/13/1520hybrid three-phase rectifier (HTR)EV battery chargingunidirectional rectifierbidirectional rectifierBOOSTSEPIC |
| spellingShingle | José Teixeira Gonçalves Stanimir Valtchev Rui Melicio Alcides Gonçalves Frede Blaabjerg Hybrid Three-Phase Rectifiers with Active Power Factor Correction: A Systematic Review Electronics hybrid three-phase rectifier (HTR) EV battery charging unidirectional rectifier bidirectional rectifier BOOST SEPIC |
| title | Hybrid Three-Phase Rectifiers with Active Power Factor Correction: A Systematic Review |
| title_full | Hybrid Three-Phase Rectifiers with Active Power Factor Correction: A Systematic Review |
| title_fullStr | Hybrid Three-Phase Rectifiers with Active Power Factor Correction: A Systematic Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Hybrid Three-Phase Rectifiers with Active Power Factor Correction: A Systematic Review |
| title_short | Hybrid Three-Phase Rectifiers with Active Power Factor Correction: A Systematic Review |
| title_sort | hybrid three phase rectifiers with active power factor correction a systematic review |
| topic | hybrid three-phase rectifier (HTR) EV battery charging unidirectional rectifier bidirectional rectifier BOOST SEPIC |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/13/1520 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT joseteixeiragoncalves hybridthreephaserectifierswithactivepowerfactorcorrectionasystematicreview AT stanimirvaltchev hybridthreephaserectifierswithactivepowerfactorcorrectionasystematicreview AT ruimelicio hybridthreephaserectifierswithactivepowerfactorcorrectionasystematicreview AT alcidesgoncalves hybridthreephaserectifierswithactivepowerfactorcorrectionasystematicreview AT fredeblaabjerg hybridthreephaserectifierswithactivepowerfactorcorrectionasystematicreview |