Conventional versus combined apgar scores in neonatal asphyxia: a prospective study

Background: Respecting gestational age and medical intervention at birth, Combined Apgar score, a new method proposed by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) may better evaluate neonatal condition at birth compared with conventional Apgar score. The combined Apgar consists of the Specified and the E...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir Kamal Hardani, Firouzeh Nili, Mamak Shariat, Fatemeh Nayeri, Hosein Dalili
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-01-01
Series:Tehran University Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://tumj.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-5285&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1819043918578188288
author Amir Kamal Hardani
Firouzeh Nili
Mamak Shariat
Fatemeh Nayeri
Hosein Dalili
author_facet Amir Kamal Hardani
Firouzeh Nili
Mamak Shariat
Fatemeh Nayeri
Hosein Dalili
author_sort Amir Kamal Hardani
collection DOAJ
description Background: Respecting gestational age and medical intervention at birth, Combined Apgar score, a new method proposed by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) may better evaluate neonatal condition at birth compared with conventional Apgar score. The combined Apgar consists of the Specified and the Expanded Apgar describe a more detailed condition at birth. In Expanded Apgar, administered intervention and in Specified Apgar, infant`s condition regardelless of gestational age and intervention are emphesised. To evaluate combined Apgar score in perinatal asphyxia, we compared conventional versus Combined Apgar scores to anticipated neonatal asphyxial complications. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, we assessed 464 neonates admitted in, Vali-e-Asr University Hospital, during one year from September 2012 to September 2013. We assessed neonates by Conventional and Combined Apgar scoring at 1, 5 and 10 minutes after birth. Asphyxia was recognized based on newborn`s records. Diagnostic criteria for asphyxia include, occurrence of metabolic or mixed acidosis, apgar score less than three in 5th minute, occurrence of neurological complications like seizure, hypotonia, coma and multiple organ failure. Then we used SPSS V16 for data analysis and compare sensitivity between two methods of Apgar scoring. Results: From 2200 delivered neonates, we assessed 464 neonates. 9.3% of studied neonates had Asphyxia, which equals 2% of live births. The Apgar score was lower in asphyxiated neonates by both methods (6±1 vs. 9±1 according to conventional method and 9±1 vs. 16±1 scored in combined method). Combined method was more sensitive than the Conventional Apgar scoring (99% vs. 88%). Conclusion: In asphyxiated neonates sensitivity and specificity of combined apgar were more than conventional apgar. With respect to this study, better assessment could be achieved by combined apgar score method instead of conventional Apgar.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T10:04:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0b1a5ef6af974ccfb1902dda710f3a07
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1683-1764
1735-7322
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-21T10:04:25Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Tehran University Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-0b1a5ef6af974ccfb1902dda710f3a072022-12-21T19:07:52ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesTehran University Medical Journal1683-17641735-73222015-01-017210717722Conventional versus combined apgar scores in neonatal asphyxia: a prospective studyAmir Kamal Hardani 0Firouzeh Nili 1Mamak Shariat 2Fatemeh Nayeri 3Hosein Dalili 4 Department Breastfeeding Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Department Breastfeeding Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Background: Respecting gestational age and medical intervention at birth, Combined Apgar score, a new method proposed by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) may better evaluate neonatal condition at birth compared with conventional Apgar score. The combined Apgar consists of the Specified and the Expanded Apgar describe a more detailed condition at birth. In Expanded Apgar, administered intervention and in Specified Apgar, infant`s condition regardelless of gestational age and intervention are emphesised. To evaluate combined Apgar score in perinatal asphyxia, we compared conventional versus Combined Apgar scores to anticipated neonatal asphyxial complications. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, we assessed 464 neonates admitted in, Vali-e-Asr University Hospital, during one year from September 2012 to September 2013. We assessed neonates by Conventional and Combined Apgar scoring at 1, 5 and 10 minutes after birth. Asphyxia was recognized based on newborn`s records. Diagnostic criteria for asphyxia include, occurrence of metabolic or mixed acidosis, apgar score less than three in 5th minute, occurrence of neurological complications like seizure, hypotonia, coma and multiple organ failure. Then we used SPSS V16 for data analysis and compare sensitivity between two methods of Apgar scoring. Results: From 2200 delivered neonates, we assessed 464 neonates. 9.3% of studied neonates had Asphyxia, which equals 2% of live births. The Apgar score was lower in asphyxiated neonates by both methods (6±1 vs. 9±1 according to conventional method and 9±1 vs. 16±1 scored in combined method). Combined method was more sensitive than the Conventional Apgar scoring (99% vs. 88%). Conclusion: In asphyxiated neonates sensitivity and specificity of combined apgar were more than conventional apgar. With respect to this study, better assessment could be achieved by combined apgar score method instead of conventional Apgar.http://tumj.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-5285&slc_lang=en&sid=1combined apgar conventional apgar neonatal asphyxia
spellingShingle Amir Kamal Hardani
Firouzeh Nili
Mamak Shariat
Fatemeh Nayeri
Hosein Dalili
Conventional versus combined apgar scores in neonatal asphyxia: a prospective study
Tehran University Medical Journal
combined apgar
conventional apgar
neonatal asphyxia
title Conventional versus combined apgar scores in neonatal asphyxia: a prospective study
title_full Conventional versus combined apgar scores in neonatal asphyxia: a prospective study
title_fullStr Conventional versus combined apgar scores in neonatal asphyxia: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Conventional versus combined apgar scores in neonatal asphyxia: a prospective study
title_short Conventional versus combined apgar scores in neonatal asphyxia: a prospective study
title_sort conventional versus combined apgar scores in neonatal asphyxia a prospective study
topic combined apgar
conventional apgar
neonatal asphyxia
url http://tumj.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-5285&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT amirkamalhardani conventionalversuscombinedapgarscoresinneonatalasphyxiaaprospectivestudy
AT firouzehnili conventionalversuscombinedapgarscoresinneonatalasphyxiaaprospectivestudy
AT mamakshariat conventionalversuscombinedapgarscoresinneonatalasphyxiaaprospectivestudy
AT fatemehnayeri conventionalversuscombinedapgarscoresinneonatalasphyxiaaprospectivestudy
AT hoseindalili conventionalversuscombinedapgarscoresinneonatalasphyxiaaprospectivestudy