In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USA
The main obstacle to making the transportation sector ecologically more sustainable is political feasibility. Effective policy-interventions usually encounter strong public opposition as they interfere in costly ways with people’s daily lives, unveiling a dilemma between political feasibility and en...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IOP Publishing
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Environmental Research Letters |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab30a2 |
_version_ | 1827870473075032064 |
---|---|
author | Michael Wicki Lukas Fesenfeld Thomas Bernauer |
author_facet | Michael Wicki Lukas Fesenfeld Thomas Bernauer |
author_sort | Michael Wicki |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The main obstacle to making the transportation sector ecologically more sustainable is political feasibility. Effective policy-interventions usually encounter strong public opposition as they interfere in costly ways with people’s daily lives, unveiling a dilemma between political feasibility and environmental policy effectiveness. Evidencing the existence of this dilemma, the literature on attitudes towards different policy instrument types maintains that so-called push measures are less supported by citizens than pull measures, and that market-based instruments tend to be less supported than non-market instruments. While these findings may uphold when considering single policy instruments, whether they continue to do so when considering policy-packages, that is, simultaneously implemented policy-interventions consisting of several policy instruments, remains unclear. To identify politically feasible and effective policy-packages aimed at greening the transportation sector we use choice experiments with representative samples of citizens from China, Germany, and the USA ( N = 4′876). Contrary to existing literature, we find that public support does not necessarily depend on the instrument type but rather on specific policy design and is highly context dependent. Moreover, despite significant differences between the three country contexts considered, various combinations of policy measures appear to be both potentially effective and supported by most citizens. Altogether, these results suggest that carefully bundled policy-packages may allow governments to employ instruments that would not be politically feasible if introduced in isolation. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T15:58:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0b1c9cf8e3d14249bed25b1fecf15b8b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1748-9326 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T15:58:17Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | IOP Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Environmental Research Letters |
spelling | doaj.art-0b1c9cf8e3d14249bed25b1fecf15b8b2023-08-09T14:45:50ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262019-01-0114808404810.1088/1748-9326/ab30a2In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USAMichael Wicki0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8972-8468Lukas Fesenfeld1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-036XThomas Bernauer2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3775-6245Institute for Science , Technology and Policy, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; International Relations, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandInternational Relations, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute for Science , Technology and Policy, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; International Relations, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandThe main obstacle to making the transportation sector ecologically more sustainable is political feasibility. Effective policy-interventions usually encounter strong public opposition as they interfere in costly ways with people’s daily lives, unveiling a dilemma between political feasibility and environmental policy effectiveness. Evidencing the existence of this dilemma, the literature on attitudes towards different policy instrument types maintains that so-called push measures are less supported by citizens than pull measures, and that market-based instruments tend to be less supported than non-market instruments. While these findings may uphold when considering single policy instruments, whether they continue to do so when considering policy-packages, that is, simultaneously implemented policy-interventions consisting of several policy instruments, remains unclear. To identify politically feasible and effective policy-packages aimed at greening the transportation sector we use choice experiments with representative samples of citizens from China, Germany, and the USA ( N = 4′876). Contrary to existing literature, we find that public support does not necessarily depend on the instrument type but rather on specific policy design and is highly context dependent. Moreover, despite significant differences between the three country contexts considered, various combinations of policy measures appear to be both potentially effective and supported by most citizens. Altogether, these results suggest that carefully bundled policy-packages may allow governments to employ instruments that would not be politically feasible if introduced in isolation.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab30a2transportationclimate changepublic opinionstated-choice experimentvehicle emissionsregulation |
spellingShingle | Michael Wicki Lukas Fesenfeld Thomas Bernauer In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USA Environmental Research Letters transportation climate change public opinion stated-choice experiment vehicle emissions regulation |
title | In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USA |
title_full | In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USA |
title_fullStr | In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USA |
title_short | In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USA |
title_sort | in search of politically feasible policy packages for sustainable passenger transport insights from choice experiments in china germany and the usa |
topic | transportation climate change public opinion stated-choice experiment vehicle emissions regulation |
url | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab30a2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michaelwicki insearchofpoliticallyfeasiblepolicypackagesforsustainablepassengertransportinsightsfromchoiceexperimentsinchinagermanyandtheusa AT lukasfesenfeld insearchofpoliticallyfeasiblepolicypackagesforsustainablepassengertransportinsightsfromchoiceexperimentsinchinagermanyandtheusa AT thomasbernauer insearchofpoliticallyfeasiblepolicypackagesforsustainablepassengertransportinsightsfromchoiceexperimentsinchinagermanyandtheusa |