Interrelationships Among Men's Threat Potential, Facial Dominance, and Vocal Dominance

The benefits of minimizing the costs of engaging in violent conflict are thought to have shaped adaptations for the rapid assessment of others’ capacity to inflict physical harm. Although studies have suggested that men’s faces and voices both contain information about their threat potential, one re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chengyang Han, Michal Kandrik, Amanda C. Hahn, Claire I. Fisher, David R. Feinberg, Iris J. Holzleitner, Lisa M. DeBruine, Benedict C. Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-03-01
Series:Evolutionary Psychology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917697332
_version_ 1797403137852571648
author Chengyang Han
Michal Kandrik
Amanda C. Hahn
Claire I. Fisher
David R. Feinberg
Iris J. Holzleitner
Lisa M. DeBruine
Benedict C. Jones
author_facet Chengyang Han
Michal Kandrik
Amanda C. Hahn
Claire I. Fisher
David R. Feinberg
Iris J. Holzleitner
Lisa M. DeBruine
Benedict C. Jones
author_sort Chengyang Han
collection DOAJ
description The benefits of minimizing the costs of engaging in violent conflict are thought to have shaped adaptations for the rapid assessment of others’ capacity to inflict physical harm. Although studies have suggested that men’s faces and voices both contain information about their threat potential, one recent study suggested that men’s faces are a more valid cue of their threat potential than their voices are. Consequently, the current study investigated the interrelationships among a composite measure of men’s actual threat potential (derived from the measures of their upper-body strength, height, and weight) and composite measures of these men’s perceived facial and vocal threat potential (derived from dominance, strength, and weight ratings of their faces and voices, respectively). Although men’s perceived facial and vocal threat potential were positively correlated, men’s actual threat potential was related to their perceived facial, but not vocal, threat potential. These results present new evidence that men’s faces may be a more valid cue of these aspects of threat potential than their voices are.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:34:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0b36698777524865add0a5a7b29e23e6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1474-7049
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:34:08Z
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Evolutionary Psychology
spelling doaj.art-0b36698777524865add0a5a7b29e23e62023-12-06T11:33:19ZengSAGE PublishingEvolutionary Psychology1474-70492017-03-011510.1177/147470491769733210.1177_1474704917697332Interrelationships Among Men's Threat Potential, Facial Dominance, and Vocal DominanceChengyang Han0Michal Kandrik1Amanda C. Hahn2Claire I. Fisher3David R. Feinberg4Iris J. Holzleitner5Lisa M. DeBruine6Benedict C. Jones7 Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK Department of Psychology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, USA Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UKThe benefits of minimizing the costs of engaging in violent conflict are thought to have shaped adaptations for the rapid assessment of others’ capacity to inflict physical harm. Although studies have suggested that men’s faces and voices both contain information about their threat potential, one recent study suggested that men’s faces are a more valid cue of their threat potential than their voices are. Consequently, the current study investigated the interrelationships among a composite measure of men’s actual threat potential (derived from the measures of their upper-body strength, height, and weight) and composite measures of these men’s perceived facial and vocal threat potential (derived from dominance, strength, and weight ratings of their faces and voices, respectively). Although men’s perceived facial and vocal threat potential were positively correlated, men’s actual threat potential was related to their perceived facial, but not vocal, threat potential. These results present new evidence that men’s faces may be a more valid cue of these aspects of threat potential than their voices are.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917697332
spellingShingle Chengyang Han
Michal Kandrik
Amanda C. Hahn
Claire I. Fisher
David R. Feinberg
Iris J. Holzleitner
Lisa M. DeBruine
Benedict C. Jones
Interrelationships Among Men's Threat Potential, Facial Dominance, and Vocal Dominance
Evolutionary Psychology
title Interrelationships Among Men's Threat Potential, Facial Dominance, and Vocal Dominance
title_full Interrelationships Among Men's Threat Potential, Facial Dominance, and Vocal Dominance
title_fullStr Interrelationships Among Men's Threat Potential, Facial Dominance, and Vocal Dominance
title_full_unstemmed Interrelationships Among Men's Threat Potential, Facial Dominance, and Vocal Dominance
title_short Interrelationships Among Men's Threat Potential, Facial Dominance, and Vocal Dominance
title_sort interrelationships among men s threat potential facial dominance and vocal dominance
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917697332
work_keys_str_mv AT chengyanghan interrelationshipsamongmensthreatpotentialfacialdominanceandvocaldominance
AT michalkandrik interrelationshipsamongmensthreatpotentialfacialdominanceandvocaldominance
AT amandachahn interrelationshipsamongmensthreatpotentialfacialdominanceandvocaldominance
AT claireifisher interrelationshipsamongmensthreatpotentialfacialdominanceandvocaldominance
AT davidrfeinberg interrelationshipsamongmensthreatpotentialfacialdominanceandvocaldominance
AT irisjholzleitner interrelationshipsamongmensthreatpotentialfacialdominanceandvocaldominance
AT lisamdebruine interrelationshipsamongmensthreatpotentialfacialdominanceandvocaldominance
AT benedictcjones interrelationshipsamongmensthreatpotentialfacialdominanceandvocaldominance