CRITERIA FOR THE COURT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION OF ITS DECISIONS
The article aims to identify the criteria of ‘the court’s compliance with the obligation to provide justification of its decisions. The following criteria have been identified: a court accepted the party’s (parties’) argument that has the following features: is concrete; is relevant; is appropriate;...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Vilnius University Press
2016-10-01
|
| Series: | Teisė |
| Online Access: | http://www.journals.vu.lt/teise/article/view/10121 |
| Summary: | The article aims to identify the criteria of ‘the court’s compliance with the obligation to provide justification of its decisions. The following criteria have been identified: a court accepted the party’s (parties’) argument that has the following features: is concrete; is relevant; is appropriate; in case of court’s refusal to accept the evidence provided by the party (parties), the court provides detailed and compelling reasons for this refusal listed in its decision document; the evidence was admitted in a fair way; the evidence was examined in a fair way; implications of evidence examination and application of judicial norms are in compliance with CPHRFF; the procedural decision-making is fair. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1392-1274 2424-6050 |