CRITERIA FOR THE COURT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION OF ITS DECISIONS

The article aims to identify the criteria of ‘the court’s compliance with the obligation to provide justification of its decisions. The following criteria have been identified: a court accepted the party’s (parties’) argument that has the following features: is concrete; is relevant; is appropriate;...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lyudmyla Deshko
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius University Press 2016-10-01
Series:Teisė
Online Access:http://www.journals.vu.lt/teise/article/view/10121
_version_ 1818393032723005440
author Lyudmyla Deshko
author_facet Lyudmyla Deshko
author_sort Lyudmyla Deshko
collection DOAJ
description The article aims to identify the criteria of ‘the court’s compliance with the obligation to provide justification of its decisions. The following criteria have been identified: a court accepted the party’s (parties’) argument that has the following features: is concrete; is relevant; is appropriate; in case of court’s refusal to accept the evidence provided by the party (parties), the court provides detailed and compelling reasons for this refusal listed in its decision document; the evidence was admitted in a fair way; the evidence was examined in a fair way; implications of evidence examination and application of judicial norms are in compliance with CPHRFF; the procedural decision-making is fair.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T05:38:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0b3a885f4dcc4249b73662186e300f87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1392-1274
2424-6050
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-14T05:38:52Z
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher Vilnius University Press
record_format Article
series Teisė
spelling doaj.art-0b3a885f4dcc4249b73662186e300f872022-12-21T23:15:04ZdeuVilnius University PressTeisė1392-12742424-60502016-10-019910.15388/Teise.2016.99.10121CRITERIA FOR THE COURT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION OF ITS DECISIONSLyudmyla DeshkoThe article aims to identify the criteria of ‘the court’s compliance with the obligation to provide justification of its decisions. The following criteria have been identified: a court accepted the party’s (parties’) argument that has the following features: is concrete; is relevant; is appropriate; in case of court’s refusal to accept the evidence provided by the party (parties), the court provides detailed and compelling reasons for this refusal listed in its decision document; the evidence was admitted in a fair way; the evidence was examined in a fair way; implications of evidence examination and application of judicial norms are in compliance with CPHRFF; the procedural decision-making is fair.http://www.journals.vu.lt/teise/article/view/10121
spellingShingle Lyudmyla Deshko
CRITERIA FOR THE COURT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION OF ITS DECISIONS
Teisė
title CRITERIA FOR THE COURT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION OF ITS DECISIONS
title_full CRITERIA FOR THE COURT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION OF ITS DECISIONS
title_fullStr CRITERIA FOR THE COURT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION OF ITS DECISIONS
title_full_unstemmed CRITERIA FOR THE COURT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION OF ITS DECISIONS
title_short CRITERIA FOR THE COURT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION OF ITS DECISIONS
title_sort criteria for the court s compliance with the obligation to provide justification of its decisions
url http://www.journals.vu.lt/teise/article/view/10121
work_keys_str_mv AT lyudmyladeshko criteriaforthecourtscompliancewiththeobligationtoprovidejustificationofitsdecisions