Argumentative Polylogues: Beyond Dialectical Understanding of Fallacies
Dialectical fallacies are typically defined as breaches of the rules of a regulated discussion between two participants (di-logue). What if discussions become more complex and involve multiple parties with distinct positions to argue for (poly-logues)? Are there distinct argumentation norms of polyl...
Main Author: | Lewiński Marcin |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2014-03-01
|
Series: | Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0010 |
Similar Items
-
A Pragmatic Analysis of Fallacies in English Religious Argumentative Discourse
by: Khawla Shukur Mahmood, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Practical Argumentation as Reasoned Advocacy
by: Marcin Lewiński
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Practical Argumentation as Reasoned Advocacy
by: Marcin Lewiński
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Fallacies in Transition: An Assessment of the Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
by: Christopher W. Tindale
Published: (1996-01-01) -
A Dialectical Analysis of the Ad Baculum Fallacy
by: Douglas Walton
Published: (2014-09-01)