Oil spill soil remediation using thermal desorption: Project synthesis and outcomes

Abstract Farmland within the Williston Basin of North Dakota was the site of the largest terrestrial oil spill to date in the United States in 2013. Over 3200 m3 of oil was released into the topsoil and subsoil, creating a risk to soil, water, and air resources. The purpose of this document is to pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter L. O'Brien, Thomas M. DeSutter, Francis X. M. Casey, Abbey Wick, Zachary J. Bartsch, S. J. Croat, Samantha Struffert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-03-01
Series:Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20463
_version_ 1827315454769627136
author Peter L. O'Brien
Thomas M. DeSutter
Francis X. M. Casey
Abbey Wick
Zachary J. Bartsch
S. J. Croat
Samantha Struffert
author_facet Peter L. O'Brien
Thomas M. DeSutter
Francis X. M. Casey
Abbey Wick
Zachary J. Bartsch
S. J. Croat
Samantha Struffert
author_sort Peter L. O'Brien
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Farmland within the Williston Basin of North Dakota was the site of the largest terrestrial oil spill to date in the United States in 2013. Over 3200 m3 of oil was released into the topsoil and subsoil, creating a risk to soil, water, and air resources. The purpose of this document is to provide a summary of results from a 7‐year project investigating the impacts of how thermal desorption (TD), the method used to remediate topsoil and subsoil, impacted contaminant reduction, soil function, and plant productivity simultaneously with site remediation. Soil disturbance and TD decreased soil organic matter and microbial communities, resulting in decreased soil function and plant production. However, TD did not reduce soil microbial recovery 4 years after treatment. Blending TD‐treated soil with uncontaminated topsoil appeared to minimize these negative effects and promote recovery of soil function. These findings provided critical information to stakeholders in the understanding of soil remediation and reclamation in this region.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T12:13:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0b6531eff2ab406e889c8ae764ee6812
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2639-6696
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:55:35Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
spelling doaj.art-0b6531eff2ab406e889c8ae764ee68122024-03-18T05:28:33ZengWileyAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment2639-66962024-03-0171n/an/a10.1002/agg2.20463Oil spill soil remediation using thermal desorption: Project synthesis and outcomesPeter L. O'Brien0Thomas M. DeSutter1Francis X. M. Casey2Abbey Wick3Zachary J. Bartsch4S. J. Croat5Samantha Struffert6USDA‐ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment Ames Iowa USASchool of Natural Resource Sciences North Dakota State University Fargo North Dakota USASchool of Natural Resource Sciences North Dakota State University Fargo North Dakota USASyngenta Group Fargo North Dakota USAStantec Consulting Services Inc Fargo North Dakota USAStealth Energy Group Williston North Dakota USAMinnesota Valley Testing Laboratory, Inc New Ulm Minnesota USAAbstract Farmland within the Williston Basin of North Dakota was the site of the largest terrestrial oil spill to date in the United States in 2013. Over 3200 m3 of oil was released into the topsoil and subsoil, creating a risk to soil, water, and air resources. The purpose of this document is to provide a summary of results from a 7‐year project investigating the impacts of how thermal desorption (TD), the method used to remediate topsoil and subsoil, impacted contaminant reduction, soil function, and plant productivity simultaneously with site remediation. Soil disturbance and TD decreased soil organic matter and microbial communities, resulting in decreased soil function and plant production. However, TD did not reduce soil microbial recovery 4 years after treatment. Blending TD‐treated soil with uncontaminated topsoil appeared to minimize these negative effects and promote recovery of soil function. These findings provided critical information to stakeholders in the understanding of soil remediation and reclamation in this region.https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20463
spellingShingle Peter L. O'Brien
Thomas M. DeSutter
Francis X. M. Casey
Abbey Wick
Zachary J. Bartsch
S. J. Croat
Samantha Struffert
Oil spill soil remediation using thermal desorption: Project synthesis and outcomes
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
title Oil spill soil remediation using thermal desorption: Project synthesis and outcomes
title_full Oil spill soil remediation using thermal desorption: Project synthesis and outcomes
title_fullStr Oil spill soil remediation using thermal desorption: Project synthesis and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Oil spill soil remediation using thermal desorption: Project synthesis and outcomes
title_short Oil spill soil remediation using thermal desorption: Project synthesis and outcomes
title_sort oil spill soil remediation using thermal desorption project synthesis and outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20463
work_keys_str_mv AT peterlobrien oilspillsoilremediationusingthermaldesorptionprojectsynthesisandoutcomes
AT thomasmdesutter oilspillsoilremediationusingthermaldesorptionprojectsynthesisandoutcomes
AT francisxmcasey oilspillsoilremediationusingthermaldesorptionprojectsynthesisandoutcomes
AT abbeywick oilspillsoilremediationusingthermaldesorptionprojectsynthesisandoutcomes
AT zacharyjbartsch oilspillsoilremediationusingthermaldesorptionprojectsynthesisandoutcomes
AT sjcroat oilspillsoilremediationusingthermaldesorptionprojectsynthesisandoutcomes
AT samanthastruffert oilspillsoilremediationusingthermaldesorptionprojectsynthesisandoutcomes