The clinical evaluation of sepsis-1 and sepsis-3 in patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology

Purpose of the study. Comparison Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 use in clinical practice at patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology. Materials and methods. The treatment results of 3302 patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology, which were operated at the clinic of the Chair of surgery and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. O. Matvijchuk, Y. A. Korol, Y. Z. Pater, R. L. Bokhonko, O. P. Tsymbala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine 2019-06-01
Series:Сучасні медичні технології
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zmapo-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/164
_version_ 1811343855132344320
author B. O. Matvijchuk
Y. A. Korol
Y. Z. Pater
R. L. Bokhonko
O. P. Tsymbala
author_facet B. O. Matvijchuk
Y. A. Korol
Y. Z. Pater
R. L. Bokhonko
O. P. Tsymbala
author_sort B. O. Matvijchuk
collection DOAJ
description Purpose of the study. Comparison Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 use in clinical practice at patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology. Materials and methods. The treatment results of 3302 patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology, which were operated at the clinic of the Chair of surgery and endoscopy at Lviv Danylo Halytskyi national medical university in 2008–2018 are analysed. In 272 (8,2%) cases there were signs of abdominal sepsis (AS). Gram-negative flora (E. coli in 198 (72,8%) of patients) was the most common cause of infection. We evaluated clinical and laboratory characteristics, which are used for stratification of patients according to classifications Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3. Results. Patients were stratified using Sepsis-1, of which 227 (83,5%) were diagnosed using Sepsis-3 (SOFA г 2). Mortality among patients with Sepsis-1 was 41,2% (112/272), among those with Sepsis-3 – 45,4% (103/227). Using Sepsis-3, 45 (16,5%) patients were excluded; values of APACHE II and SOFA, as well as length of stay in these patients was significantly lower; no deaths occurred. Therefore, diagnostic criteria of Sepsis-3 significantly reduce the number of patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology, complicated AS, compared with Sepsis-1. Diagnostic value of various factors that allow early detection of sepsis in the absence of an ideal standard is important. Conclusion. Indicators of Sepsis-3 are informative in the diagnosis and staging of abdominal sepsis.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T19:36:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0b72f556b1244dbd9e29e4e3320bda06
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-9367
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T19:36:11Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine
record_format Article
series Сучасні медичні технології
spelling doaj.art-0b72f556b1244dbd9e29e4e3320bda062022-12-22T02:33:00ZengZaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of UkraineСучасні медичні технології2072-93672019-06-012(41)454810.34287/MMT.2(41).2019.9164The clinical evaluation of sepsis-1 and sepsis-3 in patients with acute surgical abdominal pathologyB. O. Matvijchuk0Y. A. Korol1Y. Z. Pater2R. L. Bokhonko3O. P. Tsymbala4Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University Lviv, UkraineDanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University Lviv, UkraineDanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University Lviv, UkraineDanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University Lviv, UkraineDanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University Lviv, UkrainePurpose of the study. Comparison Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 use in clinical practice at patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology. Materials and methods. The treatment results of 3302 patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology, which were operated at the clinic of the Chair of surgery and endoscopy at Lviv Danylo Halytskyi national medical university in 2008–2018 are analysed. In 272 (8,2%) cases there were signs of abdominal sepsis (AS). Gram-negative flora (E. coli in 198 (72,8%) of patients) was the most common cause of infection. We evaluated clinical and laboratory characteristics, which are used for stratification of patients according to classifications Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3. Results. Patients were stratified using Sepsis-1, of which 227 (83,5%) were diagnosed using Sepsis-3 (SOFA г 2). Mortality among patients with Sepsis-1 was 41,2% (112/272), among those with Sepsis-3 – 45,4% (103/227). Using Sepsis-3, 45 (16,5%) patients were excluded; values of APACHE II and SOFA, as well as length of stay in these patients was significantly lower; no deaths occurred. Therefore, diagnostic criteria of Sepsis-3 significantly reduce the number of patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology, complicated AS, compared with Sepsis-1. Diagnostic value of various factors that allow early detection of sepsis in the absence of an ideal standard is important. Conclusion. Indicators of Sepsis-3 are informative in the diagnosis and staging of abdominal sepsis.https://zmapo-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/164acute abdominal surgical pathologyabdominal sepsissepsis-1sepsis-3mortality
spellingShingle B. O. Matvijchuk
Y. A. Korol
Y. Z. Pater
R. L. Bokhonko
O. P. Tsymbala
The clinical evaluation of sepsis-1 and sepsis-3 in patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology
Сучасні медичні технології
acute abdominal surgical pathology
abdominal sepsis
sepsis-1
sepsis-3
mortality
title The clinical evaluation of sepsis-1 and sepsis-3 in patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology
title_full The clinical evaluation of sepsis-1 and sepsis-3 in patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology
title_fullStr The clinical evaluation of sepsis-1 and sepsis-3 in patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology
title_full_unstemmed The clinical evaluation of sepsis-1 and sepsis-3 in patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology
title_short The clinical evaluation of sepsis-1 and sepsis-3 in patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology
title_sort clinical evaluation of sepsis 1 and sepsis 3 in patients with acute surgical abdominal pathology
topic acute abdominal surgical pathology
abdominal sepsis
sepsis-1
sepsis-3
mortality
url https://zmapo-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/164
work_keys_str_mv AT bomatvijchuk theclinicalevaluationofsepsis1andsepsis3inpatientswithacutesurgicalabdominalpathology
AT yakorol theclinicalevaluationofsepsis1andsepsis3inpatientswithacutesurgicalabdominalpathology
AT yzpater theclinicalevaluationofsepsis1andsepsis3inpatientswithacutesurgicalabdominalpathology
AT rlbokhonko theclinicalevaluationofsepsis1andsepsis3inpatientswithacutesurgicalabdominalpathology
AT optsymbala theclinicalevaluationofsepsis1andsepsis3inpatientswithacutesurgicalabdominalpathology
AT bomatvijchuk clinicalevaluationofsepsis1andsepsis3inpatientswithacutesurgicalabdominalpathology
AT yakorol clinicalevaluationofsepsis1andsepsis3inpatientswithacutesurgicalabdominalpathology
AT yzpater clinicalevaluationofsepsis1andsepsis3inpatientswithacutesurgicalabdominalpathology
AT rlbokhonko clinicalevaluationofsepsis1andsepsis3inpatientswithacutesurgicalabdominalpathology
AT optsymbala clinicalevaluationofsepsis1andsepsis3inpatientswithacutesurgicalabdominalpathology