Assessing work ability – a cross-sectional study of interrater agreement between disability claimants, treating physicians, and medical experts

OBJECTIVES: It is unclear to what extent assessments of work ability differ between disability claimants, their treating physicians, and multidisciplinary medical expert teams. METHODS: We compared assessments of work ability for consecutive disability claimants referred to a multidisciplinary asses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salome Dell-Kuster, Simon Lauper, Joerg Koehler, Johanna Zwimpfer, Benedikt Altermatt, Tibor Zwimpfer, Leon Zwimpfer, Jim Young, Heiner C Bucher, Alain J Nordmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH) 2014-09-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Subjects:
Online Access: https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3440
_version_ 1818925138444288000
author Salome Dell-Kuster
Simon Lauper
Joerg Koehler
Johanna Zwimpfer
Benedikt Altermatt
Tibor Zwimpfer
Leon Zwimpfer
Jim Young
Heiner C Bucher
Alain J Nordmann
author_facet Salome Dell-Kuster
Simon Lauper
Joerg Koehler
Johanna Zwimpfer
Benedikt Altermatt
Tibor Zwimpfer
Leon Zwimpfer
Jim Young
Heiner C Bucher
Alain J Nordmann
author_sort Salome Dell-Kuster
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES: It is unclear to what extent assessments of work ability differ between disability claimants, their treating physicians, and multidisciplinary medical expert teams. METHODS: We compared assessments of work ability for consecutive disability claimants referred to a multidisciplinary assessment center in Switzerland over a 4-year period. Assessments were made for the last job (LJ) prior to claiming a disability benefit and an alternative job (AJ) thought to suit the claimant’s physical and mental abilities. Mean differences (MD) in percentage work ability between assessments from claimants, physicians, and experts were then estimated in a linear regression model. RESULTS: The 3562 claims made during the study period were mostly due to musculoskeletal and depressive disorders. Assessments differed little between claimants and physicians [LJ MD 1.3% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.5–2.2%); AJ MD 11% (95% CI 10–12%)]. Experts on average assessed a claimant’s work ability higher than either the claimant or physician, particularly in the AJ [MD between expert and claimant 57% (95% CI 56–58%) and between expert and physician 46% (95% CI 45–48%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments of work ability differed substantially between experts in multidisciplinary medical teams and both claimants and their treating physicians. A careful evaluation of the disability assessment process is needed in an effort to reduce disagreement between expert teams and treating physicians and so improve acceptance of the process.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T02:36:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0b79931ffec044df86b9b3b3711ad13d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0355-3140
1795-990X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T02:36:27Z
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
spelling doaj.art-0b79931ffec044df86b9b3b3711ad13d2022-12-21T19:56:26ZengNordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health0355-31401795-990X2014-09-0140549350110.5271/sjweh.34403440Assessing work ability – a cross-sectional study of interrater agreement between disability claimants, treating physicians, and medical expertsSalome Dell-KusterSimon LauperJoerg KoehlerJohanna ZwimpferBenedikt AltermattTibor ZwimpferLeon ZwimpferJim YoungHeiner C BucherAlain J Nordmann0Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Hebelstrasse 10, CH – 4051 Basel, Switzerland.OBJECTIVES: It is unclear to what extent assessments of work ability differ between disability claimants, their treating physicians, and multidisciplinary medical expert teams. METHODS: We compared assessments of work ability for consecutive disability claimants referred to a multidisciplinary assessment center in Switzerland over a 4-year period. Assessments were made for the last job (LJ) prior to claiming a disability benefit and an alternative job (AJ) thought to suit the claimant’s physical and mental abilities. Mean differences (MD) in percentage work ability between assessments from claimants, physicians, and experts were then estimated in a linear regression model. RESULTS: The 3562 claims made during the study period were mostly due to musculoskeletal and depressive disorders. Assessments differed little between claimants and physicians [LJ MD 1.3% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.5–2.2%); AJ MD 11% (95% CI 10–12%)]. Experts on average assessed a claimant’s work ability higher than either the claimant or physician, particularly in the AJ [MD between expert and claimant 57% (95% CI 56–58%) and between expert and physician 46% (95% CI 45–48%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments of work ability differed substantially between experts in multidisciplinary medical teams and both claimants and their treating physicians. A careful evaluation of the disability assessment process is needed in an effort to reduce disagreement between expert teams and treating physicians and so improve acceptance of the process. https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3440 cross-sectional studywork abilitydisabilityphysiciandisability pensioninterrater agreementdisability claimantmedical expertclaimantdisability insurance claimdisagreementpercentage work ability
spellingShingle Salome Dell-Kuster
Simon Lauper
Joerg Koehler
Johanna Zwimpfer
Benedikt Altermatt
Tibor Zwimpfer
Leon Zwimpfer
Jim Young
Heiner C Bucher
Alain J Nordmann
Assessing work ability – a cross-sectional study of interrater agreement between disability claimants, treating physicians, and medical experts
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
cross-sectional study
work ability
disability
physician
disability pension
interrater agreement
disability claimant
medical expert
claimant
disability insurance claim
disagreement
percentage work ability
title Assessing work ability – a cross-sectional study of interrater agreement between disability claimants, treating physicians, and medical experts
title_full Assessing work ability – a cross-sectional study of interrater agreement between disability claimants, treating physicians, and medical experts
title_fullStr Assessing work ability – a cross-sectional study of interrater agreement between disability claimants, treating physicians, and medical experts
title_full_unstemmed Assessing work ability – a cross-sectional study of interrater agreement between disability claimants, treating physicians, and medical experts
title_short Assessing work ability – a cross-sectional study of interrater agreement between disability claimants, treating physicians, and medical experts
title_sort assessing work ability a cross sectional study of interrater agreement between disability claimants treating physicians and medical experts
topic cross-sectional study
work ability
disability
physician
disability pension
interrater agreement
disability claimant
medical expert
claimant
disability insurance claim
disagreement
percentage work ability
url https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3440
work_keys_str_mv AT salomedellkuster assessingworkabilityacrosssectionalstudyofinterrateragreementbetweendisabilityclaimantstreatingphysiciansandmedicalexperts
AT simonlauper assessingworkabilityacrosssectionalstudyofinterrateragreementbetweendisabilityclaimantstreatingphysiciansandmedicalexperts
AT joergkoehler assessingworkabilityacrosssectionalstudyofinterrateragreementbetweendisabilityclaimantstreatingphysiciansandmedicalexperts
AT johannazwimpfer assessingworkabilityacrosssectionalstudyofinterrateragreementbetweendisabilityclaimantstreatingphysiciansandmedicalexperts
AT benediktaltermatt assessingworkabilityacrosssectionalstudyofinterrateragreementbetweendisabilityclaimantstreatingphysiciansandmedicalexperts
AT tiborzwimpfer assessingworkabilityacrosssectionalstudyofinterrateragreementbetweendisabilityclaimantstreatingphysiciansandmedicalexperts
AT leonzwimpfer assessingworkabilityacrosssectionalstudyofinterrateragreementbetweendisabilityclaimantstreatingphysiciansandmedicalexperts
AT jimyoung assessingworkabilityacrosssectionalstudyofinterrateragreementbetweendisabilityclaimantstreatingphysiciansandmedicalexperts
AT heinercbucher assessingworkabilityacrosssectionalstudyofinterrateragreementbetweendisabilityclaimantstreatingphysiciansandmedicalexperts
AT alainjnordmann assessingworkabilityacrosssectionalstudyofinterrateragreementbetweendisabilityclaimantstreatingphysiciansandmedicalexperts