Geographic variation in projected US forest aboveground carbon responses to climate change and atmospheric deposition

Forest composition and ecosystem services are sensitive to anthropogenic pressures like climate change and atmospheric deposition of nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S). Here we extend recent forest projections for the current cohort of trees in the contiguous US, characterizing potential changes in abovegr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aspen Reese, Christopher M Clark, Jennifer Phelan, John Buckley, James Cajka, Robert D Sabo, George Van Houtven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2024-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad2739
_version_ 1797301977337561088
author Aspen Reese
Christopher M Clark
Jennifer Phelan
John Buckley
James Cajka
Robert D Sabo
George Van Houtven
author_facet Aspen Reese
Christopher M Clark
Jennifer Phelan
John Buckley
James Cajka
Robert D Sabo
George Van Houtven
author_sort Aspen Reese
collection DOAJ
description Forest composition and ecosystem services are sensitive to anthropogenic pressures like climate change and atmospheric deposition of nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S). Here we extend recent forest projections for the current cohort of trees in the contiguous US, characterizing potential changes in aboveground tree carbon at the county level in response to varying mean annual temperature, precipitation, and N and S deposition. We found that relative to a scenario with N and S deposition reduction and no climate change, greater climate change led generally to decreasing aboveground carbon (mean −7.5% under RCP4.5, −16% under RCP8.5). Keeping climate constant, reduced N deposition tended to lessen aboveground carbon (mean −7%), whereas reduced S deposition tended to increase aboveground carbon (+3%) by 2100. Through mid-century (2050), deposition was more important for predicting carbon responses except under the extreme climate scenarios (RCP _8.5 ); but, by 2100, climate drivers generally outweighed deposition. While more than 70% of counties showed reductions in aboveground carbon relative to the reference scenario, these were not evenly distributed across the US. Counties in the Northwest and Northern Great Plains, and the northern parts of New England and the Midwest, primarily showed positive responses, while counties in the Southeast showed negative responses. Counties with greater initial biomass showed less negative responses to climate change while those which exhibited the greatest change in composition (>15%) had a 95% chance of losing carbon relative to a no-climate change scenario. This analysis highlights that declines in forest growth and survival due to increases in mean temperature and reductions in atmospheric N deposition are likely to outweigh positive impacts of reduced S deposition and potential increases in precipitation. These effects vary at the regional and county level, however, so forest managers must consider local rather than national dynamics to maximize forest carbon sinks in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:30:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0b8aff43b34b4d289ca702600f9fe219
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:30:16Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-0b8aff43b34b4d289ca702600f9fe2192024-02-20T15:24:04ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262024-01-0119303402810.1088/1748-9326/ad2739Geographic variation in projected US forest aboveground carbon responses to climate change and atmospheric depositionAspen Reese0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9004-9470Christopher M Clark1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3475-9886Jennifer Phelan2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0931-3447John Buckley3https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5309-5126James Cajka4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9800-6627Robert D Sabo5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8713-7699George Van Houtven6https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6141-7318American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Science and Technology Policy Fellow, at the US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment , Washington, DC, United States of AmericaUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment , Washington, DC, United States of AmericaRTI International, Research Triangle Park , NC, United States of AmericaRTI International, Research Triangle Park , NC, United States of AmericaRTI International, Research Triangle Park , NC, United States of AmericaUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment , Washington, DC, United States of AmericaRTI International, Research Triangle Park , NC, United States of AmericaForest composition and ecosystem services are sensitive to anthropogenic pressures like climate change and atmospheric deposition of nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S). Here we extend recent forest projections for the current cohort of trees in the contiguous US, characterizing potential changes in aboveground tree carbon at the county level in response to varying mean annual temperature, precipitation, and N and S deposition. We found that relative to a scenario with N and S deposition reduction and no climate change, greater climate change led generally to decreasing aboveground carbon (mean −7.5% under RCP4.5, −16% under RCP8.5). Keeping climate constant, reduced N deposition tended to lessen aboveground carbon (mean −7%), whereas reduced S deposition tended to increase aboveground carbon (+3%) by 2100. Through mid-century (2050), deposition was more important for predicting carbon responses except under the extreme climate scenarios (RCP _8.5 ); but, by 2100, climate drivers generally outweighed deposition. While more than 70% of counties showed reductions in aboveground carbon relative to the reference scenario, these were not evenly distributed across the US. Counties in the Northwest and Northern Great Plains, and the northern parts of New England and the Midwest, primarily showed positive responses, while counties in the Southeast showed negative responses. Counties with greater initial biomass showed less negative responses to climate change while those which exhibited the greatest change in composition (>15%) had a 95% chance of losing carbon relative to a no-climate change scenario. This analysis highlights that declines in forest growth and survival due to increases in mean temperature and reductions in atmospheric N deposition are likely to outweigh positive impacts of reduced S deposition and potential increases in precipitation. These effects vary at the regional and county level, however, so forest managers must consider local rather than national dynamics to maximize forest carbon sinks in the future.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad2739aboveground carbonatmospheric depositionclimate changeforests
spellingShingle Aspen Reese
Christopher M Clark
Jennifer Phelan
John Buckley
James Cajka
Robert D Sabo
George Van Houtven
Geographic variation in projected US forest aboveground carbon responses to climate change and atmospheric deposition
Environmental Research Letters
aboveground carbon
atmospheric deposition
climate change
forests
title Geographic variation in projected US forest aboveground carbon responses to climate change and atmospheric deposition
title_full Geographic variation in projected US forest aboveground carbon responses to climate change and atmospheric deposition
title_fullStr Geographic variation in projected US forest aboveground carbon responses to climate change and atmospheric deposition
title_full_unstemmed Geographic variation in projected US forest aboveground carbon responses to climate change and atmospheric deposition
title_short Geographic variation in projected US forest aboveground carbon responses to climate change and atmospheric deposition
title_sort geographic variation in projected us forest aboveground carbon responses to climate change and atmospheric deposition
topic aboveground carbon
atmospheric deposition
climate change
forests
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad2739
work_keys_str_mv AT aspenreese geographicvariationinprojectedusforestabovegroundcarbonresponsestoclimatechangeandatmosphericdeposition
AT christophermclark geographicvariationinprojectedusforestabovegroundcarbonresponsestoclimatechangeandatmosphericdeposition
AT jenniferphelan geographicvariationinprojectedusforestabovegroundcarbonresponsestoclimatechangeandatmosphericdeposition
AT johnbuckley geographicvariationinprojectedusforestabovegroundcarbonresponsestoclimatechangeandatmosphericdeposition
AT jamescajka geographicvariationinprojectedusforestabovegroundcarbonresponsestoclimatechangeandatmosphericdeposition
AT robertdsabo geographicvariationinprojectedusforestabovegroundcarbonresponsestoclimatechangeandatmosphericdeposition
AT georgevanhoutven geographicvariationinprojectedusforestabovegroundcarbonresponsestoclimatechangeandatmosphericdeposition