An <it>in vitro</it>-identified high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome <it>in vivo</it>

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The physiological function of eukaryotic DNA occurs in the context of nucleosomal arrays that can expose or obscure defined segments of the genome. Certain DNA sequences are capable of strongly positioning a nucleosome <it>in v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gracey Lia E, Chen Zhi-Ying, Maniar Jay M, Valouev Anton, Sidow Arend, Kay Mark A, Fire Andrew Z
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-07-01
Series:Epigenetics & Chromatin
Online Access:http://www.epigeneticsandchromatin.com/content/3/1/13
_version_ 1811246348671909888
author Gracey Lia E
Chen Zhi-Ying
Maniar Jay M
Valouev Anton
Sidow Arend
Kay Mark A
Fire Andrew Z
author_facet Gracey Lia E
Chen Zhi-Ying
Maniar Jay M
Valouev Anton
Sidow Arend
Kay Mark A
Fire Andrew Z
author_sort Gracey Lia E
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The physiological function of eukaryotic DNA occurs in the context of nucleosomal arrays that can expose or obscure defined segments of the genome. Certain DNA sequences are capable of strongly positioning a nucleosome <it>in vitro</it>, suggesting the possibility that favorable intrinsic signals might reproducibly structure chromatin segments. As high-throughput sequencing analyses of nucleosome coverage <it>in vitro </it>and <it>in vivo </it>have become possible, a vigorous debate has arisen over the degree to which intrinsic DNA:nucleosome affinities orchestrate the <it>in vivo </it>positions of nucleosomes, thereby controlling physical accessibility of specific sequences in DNA.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We describe here the <it>in vivo </it>consequences of placing a synthetic high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal, the 601 sequence, into a DNA plasmid vector in mice. Strikingly, the 601 sequence was sufficient to position nucleosomes during an early phase after introduction of the DNA into the mice (when the plasmid vector transgene was active). This positioning capability was transient, with a loss of strong positioning at a later time point when the transgenes had become silent.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These results demonstrate an ability of DNA sequences selected solely for nucleosome affinity to organize chromatin <it>in vivo</it>, and the ability of other mechanisms to overcome these interactions in a dynamic nuclear environment.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T14:52:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0ba3194979ca44e9ab77cc8ed91ed262
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-8935
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T14:52:12Z
publishDate 2010-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Epigenetics & Chromatin
spelling doaj.art-0ba3194979ca44e9ab77cc8ed91ed2622022-12-22T03:28:23ZengBMCEpigenetics & Chromatin1756-89352010-07-01311310.1186/1756-8935-3-13An <it>in vitro</it>-identified high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome <it>in vivo</it>Gracey Lia EChen Zhi-YingManiar Jay MValouev AntonSidow ArendKay Mark AFire Andrew Z<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The physiological function of eukaryotic DNA occurs in the context of nucleosomal arrays that can expose or obscure defined segments of the genome. Certain DNA sequences are capable of strongly positioning a nucleosome <it>in vitro</it>, suggesting the possibility that favorable intrinsic signals might reproducibly structure chromatin segments. As high-throughput sequencing analyses of nucleosome coverage <it>in vitro </it>and <it>in vivo </it>have become possible, a vigorous debate has arisen over the degree to which intrinsic DNA:nucleosome affinities orchestrate the <it>in vivo </it>positions of nucleosomes, thereby controlling physical accessibility of specific sequences in DNA.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We describe here the <it>in vivo </it>consequences of placing a synthetic high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal, the 601 sequence, into a DNA plasmid vector in mice. Strikingly, the 601 sequence was sufficient to position nucleosomes during an early phase after introduction of the DNA into the mice (when the plasmid vector transgene was active). This positioning capability was transient, with a loss of strong positioning at a later time point when the transgenes had become silent.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These results demonstrate an ability of DNA sequences selected solely for nucleosome affinity to organize chromatin <it>in vivo</it>, and the ability of other mechanisms to overcome these interactions in a dynamic nuclear environment.</p>http://www.epigeneticsandchromatin.com/content/3/1/13
spellingShingle Gracey Lia E
Chen Zhi-Ying
Maniar Jay M
Valouev Anton
Sidow Arend
Kay Mark A
Fire Andrew Z
An <it>in vitro</it>-identified high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome <it>in vivo</it>
Epigenetics & Chromatin
title An <it>in vitro</it>-identified high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome <it>in vivo</it>
title_full An <it>in vitro</it>-identified high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome <it>in vivo</it>
title_fullStr An <it>in vitro</it>-identified high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome <it>in vivo</it>
title_full_unstemmed An <it>in vitro</it>-identified high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome <it>in vivo</it>
title_short An <it>in vitro</it>-identified high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome <it>in vivo</it>
title_sort it in vitro it identified high affinity nucleosome positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome it in vivo it
url http://www.epigeneticsandchromatin.com/content/3/1/13
work_keys_str_mv AT graceyliae anitinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT chenzhiying anitinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT maniarjaym anitinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT valouevanton anitinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT sidowarend anitinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT kaymarka anitinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT fireandrewz anitinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT graceyliae itinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT chenzhiying itinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT maniarjaym itinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT valouevanton itinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT sidowarend itinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT kaymarka itinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit
AT fireandrewz itinvitroitidentifiedhighaffinitynucleosomepositioningsignaliscapableoftransientlypositioninganucleosomeitinvivoit