Comparison of tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty

Objective: Various materials have been used for tympanic membrane reconstruction in middle ear surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the difference between the tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in patients who underwent endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty. Method: This retrospective stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gaofei Ye, Mingguang Zhou, Wenya Li, Xiuwen Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2023-06-01
Series:Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900923000245
_version_ 1797797980904882176
author Gaofei Ye
Mingguang Zhou
Wenya Li
Xiuwen Jiang
author_facet Gaofei Ye
Mingguang Zhou
Wenya Li
Xiuwen Jiang
author_sort Gaofei Ye
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Various materials have been used for tympanic membrane reconstruction in middle ear surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the difference between the tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in patients who underwent endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty. Method: This retrospective study included patients who underwent endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty from June 2021 to June 2022 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Patients were divided into group A (tragal perichondrium) and group B (COOK artificial material) according to the material used in the operation. All patients were followed up for 6 months. The differences in age, gender, operation site, disease course, preoperative air-bone gap (ABG), operation time, blood loss, hearing gain, and wound healing rate were compared between the two groups. Results: This study enrolled 197 patients, with 120 patients in group A and 77 patients in group B. There were no significant differences in age, gender, operation site, disease course, or preoperative ABG between groups A and B (p > 0.05). Both groups had significant postoperative improvement in hearing (group A: 30.98 ± 9.58 dB vs. 17.07 ± 9.92 dB, p < 0.001; group B: 29.75 ± 7.52 dB vs. 14.25 ± 9.07 dB, p < 0.001). The mean hearing gain in group A and group B was comparable (14.02 ± 11.91 dB vs. 15.50 ± 7.05 dB, p = 0.609). The wound healing rates of groups A and B were no differences (93.33% vs. 87.01%, p = 0.133). The patients in group B had a shorter operation duration (72.57 ± 11.32 min vs. 61.86 ± 9.27 min, p = 0.045) and less blood loss (12.38 ± 3.7 mL vs. 8.10 ± 2.43 mL, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material are reliable for functional and anatomical outcomes in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty, and COOK artificial material can save operation time and blood loss in surgery compared to the tragal perichondrium.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:56:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0bae4e454c2a412b95cfc03e70d921d1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2468-9009
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:56:33Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-0bae4e454c2a412b95cfc03e70d921d12023-06-22T05:04:36ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery2468-90092023-06-01626368Comparison of tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplastyGaofei Ye0Mingguang Zhou1Wenya Li2Xiuwen Jiang3Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, ChinaCorresponding author.; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, ChinaDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, ChinaDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, ChinaObjective: Various materials have been used for tympanic membrane reconstruction in middle ear surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the difference between the tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in patients who underwent endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty. Method: This retrospective study included patients who underwent endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty from June 2021 to June 2022 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Patients were divided into group A (tragal perichondrium) and group B (COOK artificial material) according to the material used in the operation. All patients were followed up for 6 months. The differences in age, gender, operation site, disease course, preoperative air-bone gap (ABG), operation time, blood loss, hearing gain, and wound healing rate were compared between the two groups. Results: This study enrolled 197 patients, with 120 patients in group A and 77 patients in group B. There were no significant differences in age, gender, operation site, disease course, or preoperative ABG between groups A and B (p > 0.05). Both groups had significant postoperative improvement in hearing (group A: 30.98 ± 9.58 dB vs. 17.07 ± 9.92 dB, p < 0.001; group B: 29.75 ± 7.52 dB vs. 14.25 ± 9.07 dB, p < 0.001). The mean hearing gain in group A and group B was comparable (14.02 ± 11.91 dB vs. 15.50 ± 7.05 dB, p = 0.609). The wound healing rates of groups A and B were no differences (93.33% vs. 87.01%, p = 0.133). The patients in group B had a shorter operation duration (72.57 ± 11.32 min vs. 61.86 ± 9.27 min, p = 0.045) and less blood loss (12.38 ± 3.7 mL vs. 8.10 ± 2.43 mL, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material are reliable for functional and anatomical outcomes in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty, and COOK artificial material can save operation time and blood loss in surgery compared to the tragal perichondrium.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900923000245TympanoplastyArtificial materialTragal perichondiumCartilage
spellingShingle Gaofei Ye
Mingguang Zhou
Wenya Li
Xiuwen Jiang
Comparison of tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty
Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Tympanoplasty
Artificial material
Tragal perichondium
Cartilage
title Comparison of tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty
title_full Comparison of tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty
title_fullStr Comparison of tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty
title_short Comparison of tragal perichondrium and COOK artificial material in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty
title_sort comparison of tragal perichondrium and cook artificial material in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty
topic Tympanoplasty
Artificial material
Tragal perichondium
Cartilage
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900923000245
work_keys_str_mv AT gaofeiye comparisonoftragalperichondriumandcookartificialmaterialinendoscopictype1tympanoplasty
AT mingguangzhou comparisonoftragalperichondriumandcookartificialmaterialinendoscopictype1tympanoplasty
AT wenyali comparisonoftragalperichondriumandcookartificialmaterialinendoscopictype1tympanoplasty
AT xiuwenjiang comparisonoftragalperichondriumandcookartificialmaterialinendoscopictype1tympanoplasty