Residual inflammatory risk predicts long-term outcomes following stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis
Background and purpose Residual inflammatory risk (RIR) can predict the unfavourable outcomes in patients with minor ischaemic stroke. However, the impact of preprocedural RIR on long-term outcomes in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) who underwent stenting rema...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
|
Series: | Stroke and Vascular Neurology |
Online Access: | https://svn.bmj.com/content/early/2023/08/28/svn-2023-002421.full |
_version_ | 1797730021726486528 |
---|---|
author | Yongjun Wang Ning Ma Zhongrong Miao Yuesong Pan Xin Lou Weilun Fu Ying Yu Zhikai Hou Long Yan Yake Lou Rongrong Cui |
author_facet | Yongjun Wang Ning Ma Zhongrong Miao Yuesong Pan Xin Lou Weilun Fu Ying Yu Zhikai Hou Long Yan Yake Lou Rongrong Cui |
author_sort | Yongjun Wang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background and purpose Residual inflammatory risk (RIR) can predict the unfavourable outcomes in patients with minor ischaemic stroke. However, the impact of preprocedural RIR on long-term outcomes in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) who underwent stenting remains understudied.Methods This retrospective, single-centre cohort study evaluated consecutive patients with severe sICAS who underwent intracranial stenting. Patients were categorised into four groups based on preprocedural high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C): residual cholesterol inflammatory risk (RCIR, hs-CRP ≥3 mg/L and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L), RIR (hs-CRP ≥3 mg/L and LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L), residual cholesterol risk (RCR, hs-CRP <3 mg/L and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L) and no residual risk (NRR, hs-CRP <3 mg/L and LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L). The long-term clinical outcomes included recurrent ischaemic stroke and death. The long-term imaging outcomes consisted of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and symptomatic ISR (sISR) after stenting.Results In this study, 952 patients were included, with 751 (78.9%) being male. Forty-six cases were categorised into the RCIR group, 211 into the RIR group, 107 into the RCR group and 588 into the NRR group. Patients with RCIR (adjusted HR 6.163; 95% CI 2.603 to 14.589; p<0.001) and RIR (adjusted HR 2.205; 95% CI 1.294 to 3.757; p=0.004) had higher risks of recurrent ischaemic stroke than those with NRR during the 54 months of median follow-up time. Patients with RCIR (adjusted HR 3.604; 95% CI 1.431 to 9.072; p=0.007) were more likely to occur ISR, and patients in the RIR group showed a significant increase in the risk of sISR (adjusted HR 2.402; 95% CI 1.078 to 5.351; p=0.032) compared with those in the NRR group with a median follow-up time of 11.9 months.Conclusions In patients with sICAS, preprocedural RIR may predict long-term recurrent ischaemic stroke, ISR and sISR following intracranial stenting. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T11:38:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0baeaaa9193f4786a2825409afdc255e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2059-8696 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T11:38:09Z |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | Article |
series | Stroke and Vascular Neurology |
spelling | doaj.art-0baeaaa9193f4786a2825409afdc255e2023-09-01T00:20:07ZengBMJ Publishing GroupStroke and Vascular Neurology2059-869610.1136/svn-2023-002421Residual inflammatory risk predicts long-term outcomes following stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosisYongjun Wang0Ning Ma1Zhongrong Miao2Yuesong Pan3Xin Lou4Weilun Fu5Ying Yu6Zhikai Hou7Long Yan8Yake Lou9Rongrong Cui102 China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People`s Republic of ChinaChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China1 Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital/Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China1 Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China1 Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China1 Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Daxing District People`s Hospital, Beijing, ChinaBackground and purpose Residual inflammatory risk (RIR) can predict the unfavourable outcomes in patients with minor ischaemic stroke. However, the impact of preprocedural RIR on long-term outcomes in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) who underwent stenting remains understudied.Methods This retrospective, single-centre cohort study evaluated consecutive patients with severe sICAS who underwent intracranial stenting. Patients were categorised into four groups based on preprocedural high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C): residual cholesterol inflammatory risk (RCIR, hs-CRP ≥3 mg/L and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L), RIR (hs-CRP ≥3 mg/L and LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L), residual cholesterol risk (RCR, hs-CRP <3 mg/L and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L) and no residual risk (NRR, hs-CRP <3 mg/L and LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L). The long-term clinical outcomes included recurrent ischaemic stroke and death. The long-term imaging outcomes consisted of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and symptomatic ISR (sISR) after stenting.Results In this study, 952 patients were included, with 751 (78.9%) being male. Forty-six cases were categorised into the RCIR group, 211 into the RIR group, 107 into the RCR group and 588 into the NRR group. Patients with RCIR (adjusted HR 6.163; 95% CI 2.603 to 14.589; p<0.001) and RIR (adjusted HR 2.205; 95% CI 1.294 to 3.757; p=0.004) had higher risks of recurrent ischaemic stroke than those with NRR during the 54 months of median follow-up time. Patients with RCIR (adjusted HR 3.604; 95% CI 1.431 to 9.072; p=0.007) were more likely to occur ISR, and patients in the RIR group showed a significant increase in the risk of sISR (adjusted HR 2.402; 95% CI 1.078 to 5.351; p=0.032) compared with those in the NRR group with a median follow-up time of 11.9 months.Conclusions In patients with sICAS, preprocedural RIR may predict long-term recurrent ischaemic stroke, ISR and sISR following intracranial stenting.https://svn.bmj.com/content/early/2023/08/28/svn-2023-002421.full |
spellingShingle | Yongjun Wang Ning Ma Zhongrong Miao Yuesong Pan Xin Lou Weilun Fu Ying Yu Zhikai Hou Long Yan Yake Lou Rongrong Cui Residual inflammatory risk predicts long-term outcomes following stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis Stroke and Vascular Neurology |
title | Residual inflammatory risk predicts long-term outcomes following stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis |
title_full | Residual inflammatory risk predicts long-term outcomes following stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis |
title_fullStr | Residual inflammatory risk predicts long-term outcomes following stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Residual inflammatory risk predicts long-term outcomes following stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis |
title_short | Residual inflammatory risk predicts long-term outcomes following stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis |
title_sort | residual inflammatory risk predicts long term outcomes following stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis |
url | https://svn.bmj.com/content/early/2023/08/28/svn-2023-002421.full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yongjunwang residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis AT ningma residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis AT zhongrongmiao residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis AT yuesongpan residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis AT xinlou residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis AT weilunfu residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis AT yingyu residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis AT zhikaihou residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis AT longyan residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis AT yakelou residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis AT rongrongcui residualinflammatoryriskpredictslongtermoutcomesfollowingstentingforsymptomaticintracranialatheroscleroticstenosis |