Sea ice meiofauna distribution on local to pan‐Arctic scales

Abstract Arctic sea ice provides microhabitats for biota that inhabit the liquid‐filled network of brine channels and the ice–water interface. We used meta‐analysis of 23 published and unpublished datasets comprising 721 ice cores to synthesize the variability in composition and abundance of sea ice...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bodil A. Bluhm, Haakon Hop, Mikko Vihtakari, Rolf Gradinger, Katrin Iken, Igor A. Melnikov, Janne E. Søreide
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-02-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3797
_version_ 1819143639117332480
author Bodil A. Bluhm
Haakon Hop
Mikko Vihtakari
Rolf Gradinger
Katrin Iken
Igor A. Melnikov
Janne E. Søreide
author_facet Bodil A. Bluhm
Haakon Hop
Mikko Vihtakari
Rolf Gradinger
Katrin Iken
Igor A. Melnikov
Janne E. Søreide
author_sort Bodil A. Bluhm
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Arctic sea ice provides microhabitats for biota that inhabit the liquid‐filled network of brine channels and the ice–water interface. We used meta‐analysis of 23 published and unpublished datasets comprising 721 ice cores to synthesize the variability in composition and abundance of sea ice meiofauna at spatial scales ranging from within a single ice core to pan‐Arctic and seasonal scales. Two‐thirds of meiofauna individuals occurred in the bottom 10 cm of the ice. Locally, replicate cores taken within meters of each other were broadly similar in meiofauna composition and abundance, while those a few km apart varied more; 75% of variation was explained by station. At the regional scale (Bering Sea first‐year ice), meiofauna abundance varied over two orders of magnitude. At the pan‐Arctic scale, the same phyla were found across the region, with taxa that have resting stages or tolerance to extreme conditions (e.g., nematodes and rotifers) dominating abundances. Meroplankton, however, was restricted to nearshore locations and landfast sea ice. Light availability, ice thickness, and distance from land were significant predictor variables for community composition on different scales. On a seasonal scale, abundances varied broadly for all taxa and in relation to the annual ice algal bloom cycle in both landfast and pack ice. Documentation of ice biota composition, abundance, and natural variability is critical for evaluating responses to decline in Arctic sea ice. Consistent methodology and protocols must be established for comparability of meiofauna monitoring across the Arctic. We recommend to (1) increase taxonomic resolution of sea ice meiofauna, (2) focus sampling on times of peak abundance when seasonal sampling is impossible, (3) include the bottom 30 cm of ice cores rather than only bottom 10 cm, (4) preserve specimens for molecular analysis to improve taxonomic resolution, and (5) formulate a trait‐based framework that relates to ecosystem functioning.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T12:29:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0baebe96c66945b6ad2202e69a632384
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T12:29:26Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-0baebe96c66945b6ad2202e69a6323842022-12-21T18:25:41ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582018-02-01842350236410.1002/ece3.3797Sea ice meiofauna distribution on local to pan‐Arctic scalesBodil A. Bluhm0Haakon Hop1Mikko Vihtakari2Rolf Gradinger3Katrin Iken4Igor A. Melnikov5Janne E. Søreide6Department of Arctic and Marine Biology Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics UiT The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø NorwayDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics UiT The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø NorwayNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre Tromsø NorwayDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics UiT The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø NorwayCollege of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks AK USAShirshov Institute of Oceanology Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow RussiaThe University Centre in Svalbard Longyearbyen NorwayAbstract Arctic sea ice provides microhabitats for biota that inhabit the liquid‐filled network of brine channels and the ice–water interface. We used meta‐analysis of 23 published and unpublished datasets comprising 721 ice cores to synthesize the variability in composition and abundance of sea ice meiofauna at spatial scales ranging from within a single ice core to pan‐Arctic and seasonal scales. Two‐thirds of meiofauna individuals occurred in the bottom 10 cm of the ice. Locally, replicate cores taken within meters of each other were broadly similar in meiofauna composition and abundance, while those a few km apart varied more; 75% of variation was explained by station. At the regional scale (Bering Sea first‐year ice), meiofauna abundance varied over two orders of magnitude. At the pan‐Arctic scale, the same phyla were found across the region, with taxa that have resting stages or tolerance to extreme conditions (e.g., nematodes and rotifers) dominating abundances. Meroplankton, however, was restricted to nearshore locations and landfast sea ice. Light availability, ice thickness, and distance from land were significant predictor variables for community composition on different scales. On a seasonal scale, abundances varied broadly for all taxa and in relation to the annual ice algal bloom cycle in both landfast and pack ice. Documentation of ice biota composition, abundance, and natural variability is critical for evaluating responses to decline in Arctic sea ice. Consistent methodology and protocols must be established for comparability of meiofauna monitoring across the Arctic. We recommend to (1) increase taxonomic resolution of sea ice meiofauna, (2) focus sampling on times of peak abundance when seasonal sampling is impossible, (3) include the bottom 30 cm of ice cores rather than only bottom 10 cm, (4) preserve specimens for molecular analysis to improve taxonomic resolution, and (5) formulate a trait‐based framework that relates to ecosystem functioning.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3797Arcticbiodiversityenvironmental monitoringmeiofaunasea icespatial and temporal scales
spellingShingle Bodil A. Bluhm
Haakon Hop
Mikko Vihtakari
Rolf Gradinger
Katrin Iken
Igor A. Melnikov
Janne E. Søreide
Sea ice meiofauna distribution on local to pan‐Arctic scales
Ecology and Evolution
Arctic
biodiversity
environmental monitoring
meiofauna
sea ice
spatial and temporal scales
title Sea ice meiofauna distribution on local to pan‐Arctic scales
title_full Sea ice meiofauna distribution on local to pan‐Arctic scales
title_fullStr Sea ice meiofauna distribution on local to pan‐Arctic scales
title_full_unstemmed Sea ice meiofauna distribution on local to pan‐Arctic scales
title_short Sea ice meiofauna distribution on local to pan‐Arctic scales
title_sort sea ice meiofauna distribution on local to pan arctic scales
topic Arctic
biodiversity
environmental monitoring
meiofauna
sea ice
spatial and temporal scales
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3797
work_keys_str_mv AT bodilabluhm seaicemeiofaunadistributiononlocaltopanarcticscales
AT haakonhop seaicemeiofaunadistributiononlocaltopanarcticscales
AT mikkovihtakari seaicemeiofaunadistributiononlocaltopanarcticscales
AT rolfgradinger seaicemeiofaunadistributiononlocaltopanarcticscales
AT katriniken seaicemeiofaunadistributiononlocaltopanarcticscales
AT igoramelnikov seaicemeiofaunadistributiononlocaltopanarcticscales
AT janneesøreide seaicemeiofaunadistributiononlocaltopanarcticscales