Learner autonomy, self regulation and metacognition

Different theories try to explain why some students are more successful than the others. Phenomenologists (Mc Combs, 1989) study self concepts of the students and find such students prone to achieve more. Attributional Theorists (Dweck, 1986; Weiner, 2005) focus on personal outcome such as effort or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Feryal Çubukcu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kura Publishing 2009-10-01
Series:International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/257
_version_ 1797909736357625856
author Feryal Çubukcu
author_facet Feryal Çubukcu
author_sort Feryal Çubukcu
collection DOAJ
description Different theories try to explain why some students are more successful than the others. Phenomenologists (Mc Combs, 1989) study self concepts of the students and find such students prone to achieve more. Attributional Theorists (Dweck, 1986; Weiner, 2005) focus on personal outcome such as effort or ability. Metacognitive theorists (Pressley, 2000; Schunk, Pintrich & Meece, 2007) examine students’ self regulated learning strategies whereas Constructivists (Maxim, 2009; Paris & Byrnes, 1989) believe supportive environments are important to be successful. In this study, the metacognitive theory will be given more importance and the purpose of the article is to find the correlation between self regulation, metacognition and autonomy.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T11:13:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0bb1181f99d945cd8305a7cc6590ae7e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1307-9298
1307-9298
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T11:13:19Z
publishDate 2009-10-01
publisher Kura Publishing
record_format Article
series International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education
spelling doaj.art-0bb1181f99d945cd8305a7cc6590ae7e2023-02-15T16:18:57ZengKura PublishingInternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education1307-92981307-92982009-10-01215364Learner autonomy, self regulation and metacognitionFeryal Çubukcu0Dokuz Eylul UniversityDifferent theories try to explain why some students are more successful than the others. Phenomenologists (Mc Combs, 1989) study self concepts of the students and find such students prone to achieve more. Attributional Theorists (Dweck, 1986; Weiner, 2005) focus on personal outcome such as effort or ability. Metacognitive theorists (Pressley, 2000; Schunk, Pintrich & Meece, 2007) examine students’ self regulated learning strategies whereas Constructivists (Maxim, 2009; Paris & Byrnes, 1989) believe supportive environments are important to be successful. In this study, the metacognitive theory will be given more importance and the purpose of the article is to find the correlation between self regulation, metacognition and autonomy.https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/257learner autonomyself regulationmetacognition.
spellingShingle Feryal Çubukcu
Learner autonomy, self regulation and metacognition
International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education
learner autonomy
self regulation
metacognition.
title Learner autonomy, self regulation and metacognition
title_full Learner autonomy, self regulation and metacognition
title_fullStr Learner autonomy, self regulation and metacognition
title_full_unstemmed Learner autonomy, self regulation and metacognition
title_short Learner autonomy, self regulation and metacognition
title_sort learner autonomy self regulation and metacognition
topic learner autonomy
self regulation
metacognition.
url https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/257
work_keys_str_mv AT feryalcubukcu learnerautonomyselfregulationandmetacognition