Unsure Theory: Ambivalence as Methodology

Ambivalence is often regarded as a ‘negative’ emotion—an ‘ugly feeling’ as Sianne Ngai outlines—where not knowing and being unsure are seen as suspicious or mentally unhealthy. In this article, I outline the initial exploratory stage of the development of a new affective theory that I have termed ‘U...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Caitlin Merrett King
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Arts
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/11/4/78
_version_ 1797432474105544704
author Caitlin Merrett King
author_facet Caitlin Merrett King
author_sort Caitlin Merrett King
collection DOAJ
description Ambivalence is often regarded as a ‘negative’ emotion—an ‘ugly feeling’ as Sianne Ngai outlines—where not knowing and being unsure are seen as suspicious or mentally unhealthy. In this article, I outline the initial exploratory stage of the development of a new affective theory that I have termed ‘Unsure Theory’, in which ambivalence is observed as a mobile and aporetic state that, from an individual perspective, embraces the holding of multiple contradictory personal opinions. Unsure Theory also outlines ambivalence as an appropriate contemporary, meta-modernist response to late stage capitalism, our current socio-political moment, and its often negative impact on mental health. The aesthetics of ambivalence is explored through embracing a hesitant vernacular, an oscillating humorous, dry and ironic to sincere tone, and an internal, anecdotal first person voice that often addresses the reader. This exploration of Unsure Theory operates in an adjacent, feminist lineage of, and in homage to, Sad Girl Theory, as coined by writer, critic and artist Audrey Wollen, and Sick Woman Theory, by artist, writer and musician Johanna Hedva, as well as Lauren Fournier’s critical responses to both. Written within the genre of art writing and in reference to my own interdisciplinary creative practice, this article exemplifies autotheoretical writing as an extension of contemporary visual art practice. This article is partially situated within my own personal experience of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy from 2020–2022 and reading the autotheoretical novel <i>Chelsea Girls</i> by Eileen Myles at the beginning of 2021. Through unpacking these personal experiences, I begin to outline an argument for embracing ambivalence, particularly within autotheoretical practice, where Unsure Theory seeks to repoliticise uncertainty towards a new generative, critical and personal perspective on not knowing.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:01:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0bb1b536cc3d488ab59b435b10c04310
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0752
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:01:04Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Arts
spelling doaj.art-0bb1b536cc3d488ab59b435b10c043102023-12-01T23:23:05ZengMDPI AGArts2076-07522022-08-011147810.3390/arts11040078Unsure Theory: Ambivalence as MethodologyCaitlin Merrett King0Glasgow School of Art, 167 Renfrew St., Glasgow G3 6RQ, UKAmbivalence is often regarded as a ‘negative’ emotion—an ‘ugly feeling’ as Sianne Ngai outlines—where not knowing and being unsure are seen as suspicious or mentally unhealthy. In this article, I outline the initial exploratory stage of the development of a new affective theory that I have termed ‘Unsure Theory’, in which ambivalence is observed as a mobile and aporetic state that, from an individual perspective, embraces the holding of multiple contradictory personal opinions. Unsure Theory also outlines ambivalence as an appropriate contemporary, meta-modernist response to late stage capitalism, our current socio-political moment, and its often negative impact on mental health. The aesthetics of ambivalence is explored through embracing a hesitant vernacular, an oscillating humorous, dry and ironic to sincere tone, and an internal, anecdotal first person voice that often addresses the reader. This exploration of Unsure Theory operates in an adjacent, feminist lineage of, and in homage to, Sad Girl Theory, as coined by writer, critic and artist Audrey Wollen, and Sick Woman Theory, by artist, writer and musician Johanna Hedva, as well as Lauren Fournier’s critical responses to both. Written within the genre of art writing and in reference to my own interdisciplinary creative practice, this article exemplifies autotheoretical writing as an extension of contemporary visual art practice. This article is partially situated within my own personal experience of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy from 2020–2022 and reading the autotheoretical novel <i>Chelsea Girls</i> by Eileen Myles at the beginning of 2021. Through unpacking these personal experiences, I begin to outline an argument for embracing ambivalence, particularly within autotheoretical practice, where Unsure Theory seeks to repoliticise uncertainty towards a new generative, critical and personal perspective on not knowing.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/11/4/78autotheorymemoryvisual artsart practisecontemporary artsocial history
spellingShingle Caitlin Merrett King
Unsure Theory: Ambivalence as Methodology
Arts
autotheory
memory
visual arts
art practise
contemporary art
social history
title Unsure Theory: Ambivalence as Methodology
title_full Unsure Theory: Ambivalence as Methodology
title_fullStr Unsure Theory: Ambivalence as Methodology
title_full_unstemmed Unsure Theory: Ambivalence as Methodology
title_short Unsure Theory: Ambivalence as Methodology
title_sort unsure theory ambivalence as methodology
topic autotheory
memory
visual arts
art practise
contemporary art
social history
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/11/4/78
work_keys_str_mv AT caitlinmerrettking unsuretheoryambivalenceasmethodology