Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis
Abstract Purpose Highly accelerated compressed sensing cine has allowed for quantification of ventricular function in a single breath hold. However, compared to segmented breath hold techniques, there may be underestimation or overestimation of LV volumes. Furthermore, a heterogeneous sample of tech...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-09-01
|
| Series: | BMC Cardiovascular Disorders |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03426-1 |
| _version_ | 1797578225218486272 |
|---|---|
| author | Jason Craft Yulee Li Niloofar Fouladi Nashta Jonathan Weber |
| author_facet | Jason Craft Yulee Li Niloofar Fouladi Nashta Jonathan Weber |
| author_sort | Jason Craft |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Purpose Highly accelerated compressed sensing cine has allowed for quantification of ventricular function in a single breath hold. However, compared to segmented breath hold techniques, there may be underestimation or overestimation of LV volumes. Furthermore, a heterogeneous sample of techniques have been used in volunteers and patients for pre-clinical and clinical use. This can complicate individual comparisons where small, but statistically significant differences exist in left ventricular morphological and/or functional parameters. This meta-analysis aims to provide a comparison of conventional cine versus compressed sensing based reconstruction techniques in patients and volunteers. Methods Two investigators performed systematic searches for eligible studies using PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science to identify studies published 1/1/2010-3/1/2021. Ultimately, 15 studies were included for comparison between compressed sensing cine and conventional imaging. Results Compared to conventional cine, there were small, statistically significant overestimation of LV mass, underestimation of stroke volume and LV end diastolic volume (mean difference 2.65 g [CL 0.57–4.73], 2.52 mL [CL 0.73–4.31], and 2.39 mL [CL 0.07–4.70], respectively). Attenuated differences persisted across studies using prospective gating (underestimated stroke volume) and non-prospective gating (underestimation of stroke volume, overestimation of mass). There were no significant differences in LV volumes or LV mass with high or low acceleration subgroups in reference to conventional cine except slight underestimation of ejection fraction among high acceleration studies. Reduction in breath hold acquisition time ranged from 33 to 64%, while reduction in total scan duration ranged from 43 to 97%. Conclusion LV volume and mass assessment using compressed sensing CMR is accurate compared to conventional parallel imaging cine. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T22:19:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0bb79975a5bb475aae0417bafef35923 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2261 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T22:19:56Z |
| publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Cardiovascular Disorders |
| spelling | doaj.art-0bb79975a5bb475aae0417bafef359232023-11-19T12:18:53ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612023-09-0123111210.1186/s12872-023-03426-1Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysisJason Craft0Yulee Li1Niloofar Fouladi Nashta2Jonathan Weber3DeMatteis Cardiovascular Institute, St. Francis Hospital & Heart CenterDeMatteis Cardiovascular Institute, St. Francis Hospital & Heart CenterSol Price School of Public Policy and Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern CaliforniaDeMatteis Cardiovascular Institute, St. Francis Hospital & Heart CenterAbstract Purpose Highly accelerated compressed sensing cine has allowed for quantification of ventricular function in a single breath hold. However, compared to segmented breath hold techniques, there may be underestimation or overestimation of LV volumes. Furthermore, a heterogeneous sample of techniques have been used in volunteers and patients for pre-clinical and clinical use. This can complicate individual comparisons where small, but statistically significant differences exist in left ventricular morphological and/or functional parameters. This meta-analysis aims to provide a comparison of conventional cine versus compressed sensing based reconstruction techniques in patients and volunteers. Methods Two investigators performed systematic searches for eligible studies using PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science to identify studies published 1/1/2010-3/1/2021. Ultimately, 15 studies were included for comparison between compressed sensing cine and conventional imaging. Results Compared to conventional cine, there were small, statistically significant overestimation of LV mass, underestimation of stroke volume and LV end diastolic volume (mean difference 2.65 g [CL 0.57–4.73], 2.52 mL [CL 0.73–4.31], and 2.39 mL [CL 0.07–4.70], respectively). Attenuated differences persisted across studies using prospective gating (underestimated stroke volume) and non-prospective gating (underestimation of stroke volume, overestimation of mass). There were no significant differences in LV volumes or LV mass with high or low acceleration subgroups in reference to conventional cine except slight underestimation of ejection fraction among high acceleration studies. Reduction in breath hold acquisition time ranged from 33 to 64%, while reduction in total scan duration ranged from 43 to 97%. Conclusion LV volume and mass assessment using compressed sensing CMR is accurate compared to conventional parallel imaging cine.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03426-1Review articleCompressed sensingReal-time cineCine MRI |
| spellingShingle | Jason Craft Yulee Li Niloofar Fouladi Nashta Jonathan Weber Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Review article Compressed sensing Real-time cine Cine MRI |
| title | Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis |
| title_full | Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis |
| title_short | Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis |
| title_sort | comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance a meta analysis |
| topic | Review article Compressed sensing Real-time cine Cine MRI |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03426-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jasoncraft comparisonbetweencompressedsensingandsegmentedcinecardiacmagneticresonanceametaanalysis AT yuleeli comparisonbetweencompressedsensingandsegmentedcinecardiacmagneticresonanceametaanalysis AT niloofarfouladinashta comparisonbetweencompressedsensingandsegmentedcinecardiacmagneticresonanceametaanalysis AT jonathanweber comparisonbetweencompressedsensingandsegmentedcinecardiacmagneticresonanceametaanalysis |