Singapore vs. the ‘Singapore of Africa’—Different Approaches to Managing Urban Agriculture

Through structured comparison, this article seeks to present the different approaches to urban agriculture in the cities of Singapore and Kigali. The former is seen as a model ‘smart city’ worth following worldwide, while the latter is frequently referred to as the ‘Singapore of Africa’. The researc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ada Górna, Krzysztof Górny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/987
_version_ 1797518484551237632
author Ada Górna
Krzysztof Górny
author_facet Ada Górna
Krzysztof Górny
author_sort Ada Górna
collection DOAJ
description Through structured comparison, this article seeks to present the different approaches to urban agriculture in the cities of Singapore and Kigali. The former is seen as a model ‘smart city’ worth following worldwide, while the latter is frequently referred to as the ‘Singapore of Africa’. The research conducted was divided into two stages. The first one was desk-based and included the analysis of satellite and aerial images along with the analysis of legal documents regarding land ownership and urban agriculture management. The second one was based on field work carried out in 2019 in both cities and comprised the mapping of areas encompassed by urban agriculture, the collection of photographic documentation, field observations, as well as semi-structured interviews. The research was summarized in line with a comparative analysis of institutional and legal framework of urban agriculture and policy towards its development; spatial features of urban agriculture, including distribution, location, and area; as well as inherent features of urban agriculture, including systems of production, main crops, production methods, and functions. The process makes it clear that despite the fact that urban agriculture is considered in planning documents of both cities, the scale of the activity and the approach towards it differ markedly. In Singapore, the authorities support mainly the high-technology and land-efficient solutions, with other, low-profit forms of agricultural activity being pushed out from the urban space. In turn, in Kigali, where the scale of agricultural activity is incomparably greater, the inhabitants enjoy a certain freedom to make use of unused land in cultivation, which increases their food security and enhances their ability to cope with external stresses.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T07:30:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0bbba6238b24485b91d184755ab07f33
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T07:30:34Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-0bbba6238b24485b91d184755ab07f332023-11-22T13:54:06ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-09-0110998710.3390/land10090987Singapore vs. the ‘Singapore of Africa’—Different Approaches to Managing Urban AgricultureAda Górna0Krzysztof Górny1Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, PolandThrough structured comparison, this article seeks to present the different approaches to urban agriculture in the cities of Singapore and Kigali. The former is seen as a model ‘smart city’ worth following worldwide, while the latter is frequently referred to as the ‘Singapore of Africa’. The research conducted was divided into two stages. The first one was desk-based and included the analysis of satellite and aerial images along with the analysis of legal documents regarding land ownership and urban agriculture management. The second one was based on field work carried out in 2019 in both cities and comprised the mapping of areas encompassed by urban agriculture, the collection of photographic documentation, field observations, as well as semi-structured interviews. The research was summarized in line with a comparative analysis of institutional and legal framework of urban agriculture and policy towards its development; spatial features of urban agriculture, including distribution, location, and area; as well as inherent features of urban agriculture, including systems of production, main crops, production methods, and functions. The process makes it clear that despite the fact that urban agriculture is considered in planning documents of both cities, the scale of the activity and the approach towards it differ markedly. In Singapore, the authorities support mainly the high-technology and land-efficient solutions, with other, low-profit forms of agricultural activity being pushed out from the urban space. In turn, in Kigali, where the scale of agricultural activity is incomparably greater, the inhabitants enjoy a certain freedom to make use of unused land in cultivation, which increases their food security and enhances their ability to cope with external stresses.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/987urban agricultureKigaliSingaporeland-use policyurban development
spellingShingle Ada Górna
Krzysztof Górny
Singapore vs. the ‘Singapore of Africa’—Different Approaches to Managing Urban Agriculture
Land
urban agriculture
Kigali
Singapore
land-use policy
urban development
title Singapore vs. the ‘Singapore of Africa’—Different Approaches to Managing Urban Agriculture
title_full Singapore vs. the ‘Singapore of Africa’—Different Approaches to Managing Urban Agriculture
title_fullStr Singapore vs. the ‘Singapore of Africa’—Different Approaches to Managing Urban Agriculture
title_full_unstemmed Singapore vs. the ‘Singapore of Africa’—Different Approaches to Managing Urban Agriculture
title_short Singapore vs. the ‘Singapore of Africa’—Different Approaches to Managing Urban Agriculture
title_sort singapore vs the singapore of africa different approaches to managing urban agriculture
topic urban agriculture
Kigali
Singapore
land-use policy
urban development
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/987
work_keys_str_mv AT adagorna singaporevsthesingaporeofafricadifferentapproachestomanagingurbanagriculture
AT krzysztofgorny singaporevsthesingaporeofafricadifferentapproachestomanagingurbanagriculture