Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity

BackgroundInhomogeneous intra-atrial conduction facilitates both initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and is reflected in electrogram (EGM) morphology.ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study is to investigate regional differences in features of different EGM types during sinu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ziliang Ye, Mathijs S. van Schie, Natasja M. S. de Groot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.652128/full
_version_ 1830140784782868480
author Ziliang Ye
Mathijs S. van Schie
Natasja M. S. de Groot
author_facet Ziliang Ye
Mathijs S. van Schie
Natasja M. S. de Groot
author_sort Ziliang Ye
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundInhomogeneous intra-atrial conduction facilitates both initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and is reflected in electrogram (EGM) morphology.ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study is to investigate regional differences in features of different EGM types during sinus rhythm (SR) and to design a patient-specific signal fingerprint, which quantifies the severity and extensiveness of inhomogeneity in conduction.MethodsPatients (N = 189, 86% male; mean age 65 ± 9 years) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) underwent high-resolution mapping of the right atrium (RA), left atrium (LA), and pulmonary vein area (PVA) including Bachmann’s bundle (BB). EGMs during 5 s of SR were classified as single potentials (SPs), short double potentials (SDPs, interval between deflections < 15 ms), long double potentials (LDPs, deflection interval > 15 ms), or fractionated potentials (FPs, ≥3 deflections). Of all SPs, differences in relative R- and S-wave amplitude were calculated (R/S ratios). Time difference between first and last deflection was determined (fractionation duration, FD) and potentials with amplitudes < 1.0 mV were labeled as low-voltage. Conduction block (CB) was defined as a difference in local activation time (LAT) between adjacent electrodes of ≥12 ms.ResultsA total of 1,763,593 EGMs (9,331 ± 3,336 per patient) were classified (Table 1).ConclusionThe signal fingerprint, consisting of quantified EGM features, including the R/S ratio of SPs, the relative frequency distribution of unipolar voltages, the proportion of low-voltage areas, the proportion of the different types of EGMs, and durations of LDP and FDP, may serve as a diagnostic tool to determine the severity and extensiveness of conduction inhomogeneity. Further studies are required to determine whether the signal fingerprint can be used to identify patients at risk for AF onset or progression.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T09:08:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0bc56005fbb14c868e9c5a583a08ca69
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-042X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T09:08:25Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj.art-0bc56005fbb14c868e9c5a583a08ca692022-12-21T21:55:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2021-03-011210.3389/fphys.2021.652128652128Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction InhomogeneityZiliang YeMathijs S. van SchieNatasja M. S. de GrootBackgroundInhomogeneous intra-atrial conduction facilitates both initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and is reflected in electrogram (EGM) morphology.ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study is to investigate regional differences in features of different EGM types during sinus rhythm (SR) and to design a patient-specific signal fingerprint, which quantifies the severity and extensiveness of inhomogeneity in conduction.MethodsPatients (N = 189, 86% male; mean age 65 ± 9 years) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) underwent high-resolution mapping of the right atrium (RA), left atrium (LA), and pulmonary vein area (PVA) including Bachmann’s bundle (BB). EGMs during 5 s of SR were classified as single potentials (SPs), short double potentials (SDPs, interval between deflections < 15 ms), long double potentials (LDPs, deflection interval > 15 ms), or fractionated potentials (FPs, ≥3 deflections). Of all SPs, differences in relative R- and S-wave amplitude were calculated (R/S ratios). Time difference between first and last deflection was determined (fractionation duration, FD) and potentials with amplitudes < 1.0 mV were labeled as low-voltage. Conduction block (CB) was defined as a difference in local activation time (LAT) between adjacent electrodes of ≥12 ms.ResultsA total of 1,763,593 EGMs (9,331 ± 3,336 per patient) were classified (Table 1).ConclusionThe signal fingerprint, consisting of quantified EGM features, including the R/S ratio of SPs, the relative frequency distribution of unipolar voltages, the proportion of low-voltage areas, the proportion of the different types of EGMs, and durations of LDP and FDP, may serve as a diagnostic tool to determine the severity and extensiveness of conduction inhomogeneity. Further studies are required to determine whether the signal fingerprint can be used to identify patients at risk for AF onset or progression.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.652128/fullsinus rhythmmappingconductionelectrogram analysiscardiac surgery
spellingShingle Ziliang Ye
Mathijs S. van Schie
Natasja M. S. de Groot
Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
Frontiers in Physiology
sinus rhythm
mapping
conduction
electrogram analysis
cardiac surgery
title Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title_full Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title_fullStr Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title_full_unstemmed Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title_short Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title_sort signal fingerprinting as a novel diagnostic tool to identify conduction inhomogeneity
topic sinus rhythm
mapping
conduction
electrogram analysis
cardiac surgery
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.652128/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ziliangye signalfingerprintingasanoveldiagnostictooltoidentifyconductioninhomogeneity
AT mathijssvanschie signalfingerprintingasanoveldiagnostictooltoidentifyconductioninhomogeneity
AT natasjamsdegroot signalfingerprintingasanoveldiagnostictooltoidentifyconductioninhomogeneity