Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide

<p>Natural aerosol emission represents one of the largest uncertainties in our understanding of the radiation budget. Sulfur emitted by marine organisms, as dimethyl sulfide (DMS), constitutes one-fifth of the global sulfur budget and yet the distribution, fluxes and fate of DMS remain poo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. L. Fiddes, M. T. Woodhouse, Z. Nicholls, T. P. Lane, R. Schofield
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-07-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/10177/2018/acp-18-10177-2018.pdf
_version_ 1818510855232290816
author S. L. Fiddes
S. L. Fiddes
S. L. Fiddes
M. T. Woodhouse
Z. Nicholls
T. P. Lane
R. Schofield
author_facet S. L. Fiddes
S. L. Fiddes
S. L. Fiddes
M. T. Woodhouse
Z. Nicholls
T. P. Lane
R. Schofield
author_sort S. L. Fiddes
collection DOAJ
description <p>Natural aerosol emission represents one of the largest uncertainties in our understanding of the radiation budget. Sulfur emitted by marine organisms, as dimethyl sulfide (DMS), constitutes one-fifth of the global sulfur budget and yet the distribution, fluxes and fate of DMS remain poorly constrained. This study evaluates the Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS) United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosol (UKCA) model in terms of cloud fraction, radiation and precipitation, and then quantifies the role of DMS in the chemistry–climate system. We find that ACCESS-UKCA has similar cloud and radiation biases to other global climate models. By removing all DMS, or alternatively significantly enhancing marine DMS, we find a top of the atmosphere radiative effect of 1.7 and −1.4&thinsp;W m<sup>−2</sup> respectively. The largest responses to these DMS perturbations (removal/enhancement) are in stratiform cloud decks in the Southern Hemisphere's eastern ocean basins. These regions show significant differences in low cloud (−9∕ + 6&thinsp;%), surface incoming shortwave radiation (+7∕ − 5&thinsp;W m<sup>−2</sup>) and large-scale rainfall (+15∕ − 10&thinsp;%). We demonstrate a precipitation suppression effect of DMS-derived aerosol in stratiform cloud deck regions due to DMS, coupled with an increase in low cloud fraction. The difference in low cloud fraction is an example of the aerosol lifetime effect. Globally, we find a sensitivity of temperature to annual DMS flux of 0.027 and 0.019&thinsp;K per Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> of sulfur, respectively. Other areas of low cloud formation, such as the Southern Ocean and stratiform cloud decks in the Northern Hemisphere, have a relatively weak response to DMS perturbations. We highlight the need for greater understanding of the DMS–climate cycle within the context of uncertainties and biases of climate models as well as those of DMS–climate observations.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T23:25:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0bd10fa625794dd8a596bb256fa28c3f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T23:25:49Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-0bd10fa625794dd8a596bb256fa28c3f2022-12-22T01:29:35ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242018-07-0118101771019810.5194/acp-18-10177-2018Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfideS. L. Fiddes0S. L. Fiddes1S. L. Fiddes2M. T. Woodhouse3Z. Nicholls4T. P. Lane5R. Schofield6Australian–German Climate and Energy College, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, AustraliaARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, AustraliaClimate Science Centre, Oceans and Atmosphere, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Aspendale, 3195, AustraliaClimate Science Centre, Oceans and Atmosphere, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Aspendale, 3195, AustraliaAustralian–German Climate and Energy College, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, AustraliaARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, AustraliaARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia<p>Natural aerosol emission represents one of the largest uncertainties in our understanding of the radiation budget. Sulfur emitted by marine organisms, as dimethyl sulfide (DMS), constitutes one-fifth of the global sulfur budget and yet the distribution, fluxes and fate of DMS remain poorly constrained. This study evaluates the Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS) United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosol (UKCA) model in terms of cloud fraction, radiation and precipitation, and then quantifies the role of DMS in the chemistry–climate system. We find that ACCESS-UKCA has similar cloud and radiation biases to other global climate models. By removing all DMS, or alternatively significantly enhancing marine DMS, we find a top of the atmosphere radiative effect of 1.7 and −1.4&thinsp;W m<sup>−2</sup> respectively. The largest responses to these DMS perturbations (removal/enhancement) are in stratiform cloud decks in the Southern Hemisphere's eastern ocean basins. These regions show significant differences in low cloud (−9∕ + 6&thinsp;%), surface incoming shortwave radiation (+7∕ − 5&thinsp;W m<sup>−2</sup>) and large-scale rainfall (+15∕ − 10&thinsp;%). We demonstrate a precipitation suppression effect of DMS-derived aerosol in stratiform cloud deck regions due to DMS, coupled with an increase in low cloud fraction. The difference in low cloud fraction is an example of the aerosol lifetime effect. Globally, we find a sensitivity of temperature to annual DMS flux of 0.027 and 0.019&thinsp;K per Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> of sulfur, respectively. Other areas of low cloud formation, such as the Southern Ocean and stratiform cloud decks in the Northern Hemisphere, have a relatively weak response to DMS perturbations. We highlight the need for greater understanding of the DMS–climate cycle within the context of uncertainties and biases of climate models as well as those of DMS–climate observations.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/10177/2018/acp-18-10177-2018.pdf
spellingShingle S. L. Fiddes
S. L. Fiddes
S. L. Fiddes
M. T. Woodhouse
Z. Nicholls
T. P. Lane
R. Schofield
Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide
title_full Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide
title_fullStr Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide
title_full_unstemmed Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide
title_short Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide
title_sort cloud precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/10177/2018/acp-18-10177-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT slfiddes cloudprecipitationandradiationresponsestolargeperturbationsinglobaldimethylsulfide
AT slfiddes cloudprecipitationandradiationresponsestolargeperturbationsinglobaldimethylsulfide
AT slfiddes cloudprecipitationandradiationresponsestolargeperturbationsinglobaldimethylsulfide
AT mtwoodhouse cloudprecipitationandradiationresponsestolargeperturbationsinglobaldimethylsulfide
AT znicholls cloudprecipitationandradiationresponsestolargeperturbationsinglobaldimethylsulfide
AT tplane cloudprecipitationandradiationresponsestolargeperturbationsinglobaldimethylsulfide
AT rschofield cloudprecipitationandradiationresponsestolargeperturbationsinglobaldimethylsulfide