A meta-analysis of microcosm experiments shows that dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in polar waters is insensitive to ocean acidification

<p>Emissions of dimethylsulfide (DMS) from the polar oceans play a key role in atmospheric processes and climate. Therefore, it is important to increase our understanding of how DMS production in these regions may respond to climate change. The polar oceans are particularly vulnerable to ocean...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. E. Hopkins, P. D. Nightingale, J. A. Stephens, C. M. Moore, S. Richier, G. L. Cripps, S. D. Archer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/163/2020/bg-17-163-2020.pdf
_version_ 1818261494493609984
author F. E. Hopkins
P. D. Nightingale
J. A. Stephens
C. M. Moore
S. Richier
G. L. Cripps
S. D. Archer
author_facet F. E. Hopkins
P. D. Nightingale
J. A. Stephens
C. M. Moore
S. Richier
G. L. Cripps
S. D. Archer
author_sort F. E. Hopkins
collection DOAJ
description <p>Emissions of dimethylsulfide (DMS) from the polar oceans play a key role in atmospheric processes and climate. Therefore, it is important to increase our understanding of how DMS production in these regions may respond to climate change. The polar oceans are particularly vulnerable to ocean acidification (OA). However, our understanding of the polar DMS response is limited to two studies conducted in Arctic waters, where in both cases DMS concentrations decreased with increasing acidity. Here, we report on our findings from seven summertime shipboard microcosm experiments undertaken in a variety of locations in the Arctic Ocean and Southern Ocean. These experiments reveal no significant effects of short-term OA on the net production of DMS by planktonic communities. This is in contrast to similar experiments from temperate north-western European shelf waters where surface ocean communities responded to OA with significant increases in dissolved DMS concentrations. A meta-analysis of the findings from both temperate and polar waters (<span class="inline-formula"><i>n</i>=18</span> experiments) reveals clear regional differences in the DMS response to OA. Based on our findings, we hypothesize that the differences in DMS response between temperate and polar waters reflect the natural variability in carbonate chemistry to which the respective communities of each region may already be adapted. If so, future temperate oceans could be more sensitive to OA, resulting in an increase in DMS emissions to the atmosphere, whilst perhaps surprisingly DMS emissions from the polar oceans may remain relatively unchanged. By demonstrating that DMS emissions from geographically distinct regions may vary in their response to OA, our results may facilitate a better understanding of Earth's future climate. Our study suggests that the way in which processes that generate DMS respond to OA may be regionally distinct, and this should be taken into account in predicting future DMS emissions and their influence on Earth's climate.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-12T18:48:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0bdf4dded77047b2b84a2bdcf771e4bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T18:48:07Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-0bdf4dded77047b2b84a2bdcf771e4bb2022-12-22T00:15:27ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892020-01-011716318610.5194/bg-17-163-2020A meta-analysis of microcosm experiments shows that dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in polar waters is insensitive to ocean acidificationF. E. Hopkins0P. D. Nightingale1J. A. Stephens2C. M. Moore3S. Richier4G. L. Cripps5S. D. Archer6Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UKPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UKPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UKOcean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKOcean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKOcean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, Maine, USA<p>Emissions of dimethylsulfide (DMS) from the polar oceans play a key role in atmospheric processes and climate. Therefore, it is important to increase our understanding of how DMS production in these regions may respond to climate change. The polar oceans are particularly vulnerable to ocean acidification (OA). However, our understanding of the polar DMS response is limited to two studies conducted in Arctic waters, where in both cases DMS concentrations decreased with increasing acidity. Here, we report on our findings from seven summertime shipboard microcosm experiments undertaken in a variety of locations in the Arctic Ocean and Southern Ocean. These experiments reveal no significant effects of short-term OA on the net production of DMS by planktonic communities. This is in contrast to similar experiments from temperate north-western European shelf waters where surface ocean communities responded to OA with significant increases in dissolved DMS concentrations. A meta-analysis of the findings from both temperate and polar waters (<span class="inline-formula"><i>n</i>=18</span> experiments) reveals clear regional differences in the DMS response to OA. Based on our findings, we hypothesize that the differences in DMS response between temperate and polar waters reflect the natural variability in carbonate chemistry to which the respective communities of each region may already be adapted. If so, future temperate oceans could be more sensitive to OA, resulting in an increase in DMS emissions to the atmosphere, whilst perhaps surprisingly DMS emissions from the polar oceans may remain relatively unchanged. By demonstrating that DMS emissions from geographically distinct regions may vary in their response to OA, our results may facilitate a better understanding of Earth's future climate. Our study suggests that the way in which processes that generate DMS respond to OA may be regionally distinct, and this should be taken into account in predicting future DMS emissions and their influence on Earth's climate.</p>https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/163/2020/bg-17-163-2020.pdf
spellingShingle F. E. Hopkins
P. D. Nightingale
J. A. Stephens
C. M. Moore
S. Richier
G. L. Cripps
S. D. Archer
A meta-analysis of microcosm experiments shows that dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in polar waters is insensitive to ocean acidification
Biogeosciences
title A meta-analysis of microcosm experiments shows that dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in polar waters is insensitive to ocean acidification
title_full A meta-analysis of microcosm experiments shows that dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in polar waters is insensitive to ocean acidification
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of microcosm experiments shows that dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in polar waters is insensitive to ocean acidification
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of microcosm experiments shows that dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in polar waters is insensitive to ocean acidification
title_short A meta-analysis of microcosm experiments shows that dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production in polar waters is insensitive to ocean acidification
title_sort meta analysis of microcosm experiments shows that dimethyl sulfide dms production in polar waters is insensitive to ocean acidification
url https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/163/2020/bg-17-163-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fehopkins ametaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT pdnightingale ametaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT jastephens ametaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT cmmoore ametaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT srichier ametaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT glcripps ametaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT sdarcher ametaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT fehopkins metaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT pdnightingale metaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT jastephens metaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT cmmoore metaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT srichier metaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT glcripps metaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification
AT sdarcher metaanalysisofmicrocosmexperimentsshowsthatdimethylsulfidedmsproductioninpolarwatersisinsensitivetooceanacidification