Comparative Performance Evaluation of Commercial Packing Materials for Malodorants Abatement in Biofiltration

Packing materials used in biofiltration of gaseous pollutants represent a key design parameter, as a proper selection might not only determine the adequate performance of the system but also its cost-effectiveness. This study systematically assessed and compared the performance of a conventional pla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raquel Lebrero, Elisa Rodríguez, María Collantes, Carlos De Juan, Geir Norden, Kim Rosenbom, Raúl Muñoz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/7/2966
_version_ 1827696682228252672
author Raquel Lebrero
Elisa Rodríguez
María Collantes
Carlos De Juan
Geir Norden
Kim Rosenbom
Raúl Muñoz
author_facet Raquel Lebrero
Elisa Rodríguez
María Collantes
Carlos De Juan
Geir Norden
Kim Rosenbom
Raúl Muñoz
author_sort Raquel Lebrero
collection DOAJ
description Packing materials used in biofiltration of gaseous pollutants represent a key design parameter, as a proper selection might not only determine the adequate performance of the system but also its cost-effectiveness. This study systematically assessed and compared the performance of a conventional plastic carrier with that of two novel clay-based materials from SAINT GOBAIN for the abatement of a model odorous stream composed of H<sub>2</sub>S, methylmercaptan and toluene. The packing materials were tested in biotrickling filters, biofilters and a two-phase biotrickling filter. SAINT GOBAIN materials exhibited a higher adsorption potential under abiotic conditions, a higher buffer capacity and a superior performance compared to conventional plastic rings when implemented in biotrickling filters operating at gas residence times as low as 7.5 s. Among the materials tested in biofilters, Filtralite Air AC supported almost complete H<sub>2</sub>S and toluene removals at a gas residence time of 20 s, while successfully eliminating methylmercaptan at values of ~80%. Interestingly, under most of the conditions tested, clay-based materials also showed comparable pressure drop values than those of plastic rings.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:52:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0be062a6a13f4105865a7b64a4b397bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:52:53Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-0be062a6a13f4105865a7b64a4b397bd2023-11-21T12:06:48ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-03-01117296610.3390/app11072966Comparative Performance Evaluation of Commercial Packing Materials for Malodorants Abatement in BiofiltrationRaquel Lebrero0Elisa Rodríguez1María Collantes2Carlos De Juan3Geir Norden4Kim Rosenbom5Raúl Muñoz6Institute of Sustainable Processes, University of Valladolid, Mergelina s/n., 47011 Valladolid, SpainInstitute of Sustainable Processes, University of Valladolid, Mergelina s/n., 47011 Valladolid, SpainInstitute of Sustainable Processes, University of Valladolid, Mergelina s/n., 47011 Valladolid, SpainSAINT GOBAIN, LECA INTERNATIONAL, Robert Jacobsens Vej 62A, 2300 Københavny, DenmarkSAINT GOBAIN, LECA INTERNATIONAL, Robert Jacobsens Vej 62A, 2300 Københavny, DenmarkSAINT GOBAIN, LECA INTERNATIONAL, Robert Jacobsens Vej 62A, 2300 Københavny, DenmarkInstitute of Sustainable Processes, University of Valladolid, Mergelina s/n., 47011 Valladolid, SpainPacking materials used in biofiltration of gaseous pollutants represent a key design parameter, as a proper selection might not only determine the adequate performance of the system but also its cost-effectiveness. This study systematically assessed and compared the performance of a conventional plastic carrier with that of two novel clay-based materials from SAINT GOBAIN for the abatement of a model odorous stream composed of H<sub>2</sub>S, methylmercaptan and toluene. The packing materials were tested in biotrickling filters, biofilters and a two-phase biotrickling filter. SAINT GOBAIN materials exhibited a higher adsorption potential under abiotic conditions, a higher buffer capacity and a superior performance compared to conventional plastic rings when implemented in biotrickling filters operating at gas residence times as low as 7.5 s. Among the materials tested in biofilters, Filtralite Air AC supported almost complete H<sub>2</sub>S and toluene removals at a gas residence time of 20 s, while successfully eliminating methylmercaptan at values of ~80%. Interestingly, under most of the conditions tested, clay-based materials also showed comparable pressure drop values than those of plastic rings.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/7/2966biofiltrationFiltraliteodour treatmentpacking materialpressure droptwo-phase biotrickling filter
spellingShingle Raquel Lebrero
Elisa Rodríguez
María Collantes
Carlos De Juan
Geir Norden
Kim Rosenbom
Raúl Muñoz
Comparative Performance Evaluation of Commercial Packing Materials for Malodorants Abatement in Biofiltration
Applied Sciences
biofiltration
Filtralite
odour treatment
packing material
pressure drop
two-phase biotrickling filter
title Comparative Performance Evaluation of Commercial Packing Materials for Malodorants Abatement in Biofiltration
title_full Comparative Performance Evaluation of Commercial Packing Materials for Malodorants Abatement in Biofiltration
title_fullStr Comparative Performance Evaluation of Commercial Packing Materials for Malodorants Abatement in Biofiltration
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Performance Evaluation of Commercial Packing Materials for Malodorants Abatement in Biofiltration
title_short Comparative Performance Evaluation of Commercial Packing Materials for Malodorants Abatement in Biofiltration
title_sort comparative performance evaluation of commercial packing materials for malodorants abatement in biofiltration
topic biofiltration
Filtralite
odour treatment
packing material
pressure drop
two-phase biotrickling filter
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/7/2966
work_keys_str_mv AT raquellebrero comparativeperformanceevaluationofcommercialpackingmaterialsformalodorantsabatementinbiofiltration
AT elisarodriguez comparativeperformanceevaluationofcommercialpackingmaterialsformalodorantsabatementinbiofiltration
AT mariacollantes comparativeperformanceevaluationofcommercialpackingmaterialsformalodorantsabatementinbiofiltration
AT carlosdejuan comparativeperformanceevaluationofcommercialpackingmaterialsformalodorantsabatementinbiofiltration
AT geirnorden comparativeperformanceevaluationofcommercialpackingmaterialsformalodorantsabatementinbiofiltration
AT kimrosenbom comparativeperformanceevaluationofcommercialpackingmaterialsformalodorantsabatementinbiofiltration
AT raulmunoz comparativeperformanceevaluationofcommercialpackingmaterialsformalodorantsabatementinbiofiltration