The restricted mean survival time as a replacement for the hazard ratio and the number needed to treat in long‐term studies
Abstract Aims We applied the restricted mean survival time (RMST) to analyse the survival data reported in the PARADIGM‐HT trial in which sacubitril + valsartan was studied in comparison with enalapril in patients with heart failure. The estimates of this parameter were compared with the published v...
Main Authors: | Andrea Messori, Laura Bartoli, Sabrina Trippoli |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-06-01
|
Series: | ESC Heart Failure |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13306 |
Similar Items
-
Reduction in number to treat versus number needed to treat
by: Chenyang Zhang, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
What are relative risk, number needed to treat and odds ratio?
by: Prasad Kameshwar
Published: (2007-01-01) -
Individual patient data network meta-analysis using either restricted mean survival time difference or hazard ratios: is there a difference? A case study on locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas
by: C. Petit, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Znaczenie parametru number needed to treat w ocenie skuteczności terapii
by: Andrzej Potemkowski
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Number needed to treat for interleukin inhibitors approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Italy
by: Roberto Ravasio, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)