Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility between CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymers Applied in Prosthetic Dentistry
Modern media often portray CAD/CAM technology as widely utilized in the fabrication of dental prosthetics. This study presents a comparative analysis of the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing) polymers and conventional polymers c...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Polymers |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/16/7/877 |
| _version_ | 1797212059673296896 |
|---|---|
| author | Bozhana Chuchulska Mariya Dimitrova Angelina Vlahova Ilian Hristov Zlatina Tomova Rada Kazakova |
| author_facet | Bozhana Chuchulska Mariya Dimitrova Angelina Vlahova Ilian Hristov Zlatina Tomova Rada Kazakova |
| author_sort | Bozhana Chuchulska |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Modern media often portray CAD/CAM technology as widely utilized in the fabrication of dental prosthetics. This study presents a comparative analysis of the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing) polymers and conventional polymers commonly utilized in prosthetic dentistry. With the increasing adoption of CAD/CAM technology in dental laboratories and practices, understanding the differences in material properties is crucial for informed decision-making in prosthodontic treatment planning. Through a narrative review of the literature and empirical data, this study evaluates the mechanical strength, durability, esthetics, and biocompatibility of CAD/CAM polymers in comparison to traditional polymers. Furthermore, it examines the implications of these findings on the clinical outcomes and long-term success of prosthetic restorations. The results provide valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of CAD/CAM polymers, informing clinicians and researchers about their suitability for various dental prosthetic applications. This study underscores the considerable advantages of CAD/CAM polymers over conventional ones in terms of mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and esthetics for prosthetic dentistry. CAD/CAM technology offers improved mechanical strength and durability, potentially enhancing the long-term performance of dental prosthetics, while the biocompatibility of these polymers makes them suitable for a broad patient demographic, reducing the risk of adverse reactions. The practical implications of these findings for dental technicians and dentists are significant, as understanding these material differences enables tailored treatment planning to meet individual patient needs and preferences. Integration of CAD/CAM technology into dental practices can lead to more predictable outcomes and heightened patient satisfaction with prosthetic restorations. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T10:36:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0bea176deda84d4daa70680356294011 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2073-4360 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T10:36:22Z |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Polymers |
| spelling | doaj.art-0bea176deda84d4daa706803562940112024-04-12T13:25:00ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602024-03-0116787710.3390/polym16070877Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility between CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymers Applied in Prosthetic DentistryBozhana Chuchulska0Mariya Dimitrova1Angelina Vlahova2Ilian Hristov3Zlatina Tomova4Rada Kazakova5Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, BulgariaDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, BulgariaDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, BulgariaDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, BulgariaDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, BulgariaDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, BulgariaModern media often portray CAD/CAM technology as widely utilized in the fabrication of dental prosthetics. This study presents a comparative analysis of the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing) polymers and conventional polymers commonly utilized in prosthetic dentistry. With the increasing adoption of CAD/CAM technology in dental laboratories and practices, understanding the differences in material properties is crucial for informed decision-making in prosthodontic treatment planning. Through a narrative review of the literature and empirical data, this study evaluates the mechanical strength, durability, esthetics, and biocompatibility of CAD/CAM polymers in comparison to traditional polymers. Furthermore, it examines the implications of these findings on the clinical outcomes and long-term success of prosthetic restorations. The results provide valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of CAD/CAM polymers, informing clinicians and researchers about their suitability for various dental prosthetic applications. This study underscores the considerable advantages of CAD/CAM polymers over conventional ones in terms of mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and esthetics for prosthetic dentistry. CAD/CAM technology offers improved mechanical strength and durability, potentially enhancing the long-term performance of dental prosthetics, while the biocompatibility of these polymers makes them suitable for a broad patient demographic, reducing the risk of adverse reactions. The practical implications of these findings for dental technicians and dentists are significant, as understanding these material differences enables tailored treatment planning to meet individual patient needs and preferences. Integration of CAD/CAM technology into dental practices can lead to more predictable outcomes and heightened patient satisfaction with prosthetic restorations.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/16/7/8773D printingCAD/CAMPEEKthermoplasticprosthodonticspolymers |
| spellingShingle | Bozhana Chuchulska Mariya Dimitrova Angelina Vlahova Ilian Hristov Zlatina Tomova Rada Kazakova Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility between CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymers Applied in Prosthetic Dentistry Polymers 3D printing CAD/CAM PEEK thermoplastic prosthodontics polymers |
| title | Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility between CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymers Applied in Prosthetic Dentistry |
| title_full | Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility between CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymers Applied in Prosthetic Dentistry |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility between CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymers Applied in Prosthetic Dentistry |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility between CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymers Applied in Prosthetic Dentistry |
| title_short | Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility between CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymers Applied in Prosthetic Dentistry |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of the mechanical properties and biocompatibility between cad cam and conventional polymers applied in prosthetic dentistry |
| topic | 3D printing CAD/CAM PEEK thermoplastic prosthodontics polymers |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/16/7/877 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bozhanachuchulska comparativeanalysisofthemechanicalpropertiesandbiocompatibilitybetweencadcamandconventionalpolymersappliedinprostheticdentistry AT mariyadimitrova comparativeanalysisofthemechanicalpropertiesandbiocompatibilitybetweencadcamandconventionalpolymersappliedinprostheticdentistry AT angelinavlahova comparativeanalysisofthemechanicalpropertiesandbiocompatibilitybetweencadcamandconventionalpolymersappliedinprostheticdentistry AT ilianhristov comparativeanalysisofthemechanicalpropertiesandbiocompatibilitybetweencadcamandconventionalpolymersappliedinprostheticdentistry AT zlatinatomova comparativeanalysisofthemechanicalpropertiesandbiocompatibilitybetweencadcamandconventionalpolymersappliedinprostheticdentistry AT radakazakova comparativeanalysisofthemechanicalpropertiesandbiocompatibilitybetweencadcamandconventionalpolymersappliedinprostheticdentistry |