Tracking Deep Sediment Underplating in a Fossil Subduction Margin: Implications for Interface Rheology and Mass and Volatile Recycling

Abstract The architecture and mechanical properties of the subduction interface impact large‐scale subduction processes, including mass and volatile recycling, upper‐plate orogenesis, and seismic behavior. The nature of the deep subduction interface, where a dominantly frictional megathrust likely t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. M. Tewksbury‐Christle, W. M. Behr, M. A. Helper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-03-01
Series:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009463
_version_ 1797637987159244800
author C. M. Tewksbury‐Christle
W. M. Behr
M. A. Helper
author_facet C. M. Tewksbury‐Christle
W. M. Behr
M. A. Helper
author_sort C. M. Tewksbury‐Christle
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The architecture and mechanical properties of the subduction interface impact large‐scale subduction processes, including mass and volatile recycling, upper‐plate orogenesis, and seismic behavior. The nature of the deep subduction interface, where a dominantly frictional megathrust likely transitions to a distributed ductile shear zone, is poorly understood, due to a lack of constraints on rock types, strain distribution, and interface thickness in this depth range. We characterized these factors in the Condrey Mountain Schist, a Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous subduction complex in northern California that consists of an upper and lower unit. The Lower Condrey unit is predominantly pelagic and hemipelagic metasediment with m‐to km‐scale metamafic and metaserpentinitic ultramafic lenses all deformed at epidote blueschist facies (0.7–1.1 GPa, 450°C). Major and trace element geochemistry suggest tectonic erosion of the overriding plate sourced all ultramafic and some mafic lenses. We identified two major ductile thrust zones responsible for Lower Condrey unit assembly, with earlier strain distributed across the structural thickness between the ductile thrusts. The Lower Condrey unit records distributed deformation across a sediment‐dominated, 2+ km thick shear zone, possibly consistent with low velocity zones observed in modern subduction zones, despite subducting along a sediment poor, tectonically erosive margin. Periodic strain localization occurred when rheological heterogeneities (i.e., km‐scale ultramafic lenses) entered the interface, facilitating underplating that preserved 10%–60% of the incoming sediment. Modern mass and volatile budgets do not account for erosive margin underplating, so improved quantification is crucial for predicting mass and volatile net flux to Earth′s interior.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:57:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0bf2b7f53bcb420796e920d80c71b238
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1525-2027
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:57:10Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
spelling doaj.art-0bf2b7f53bcb420796e920d80c71b2382023-11-03T17:00:23ZengWileyGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1525-20272021-03-01223n/an/a10.1029/2020GC009463Tracking Deep Sediment Underplating in a Fossil Subduction Margin: Implications for Interface Rheology and Mass and Volatile RecyclingC. M. Tewksbury‐Christle0W. M. Behr1M. A. Helper2Structural Geology and Tectonics Group Geological Institute Department of Earth Sciences ETH Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandStructural Geology and Tectonics Group Geological Institute Department of Earth Sciences ETH Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandDepartment of Geological Sciences Jackson School of Geosciences University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USAAbstract The architecture and mechanical properties of the subduction interface impact large‐scale subduction processes, including mass and volatile recycling, upper‐plate orogenesis, and seismic behavior. The nature of the deep subduction interface, where a dominantly frictional megathrust likely transitions to a distributed ductile shear zone, is poorly understood, due to a lack of constraints on rock types, strain distribution, and interface thickness in this depth range. We characterized these factors in the Condrey Mountain Schist, a Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous subduction complex in northern California that consists of an upper and lower unit. The Lower Condrey unit is predominantly pelagic and hemipelagic metasediment with m‐to km‐scale metamafic and metaserpentinitic ultramafic lenses all deformed at epidote blueschist facies (0.7–1.1 GPa, 450°C). Major and trace element geochemistry suggest tectonic erosion of the overriding plate sourced all ultramafic and some mafic lenses. We identified two major ductile thrust zones responsible for Lower Condrey unit assembly, with earlier strain distributed across the structural thickness between the ductile thrusts. The Lower Condrey unit records distributed deformation across a sediment‐dominated, 2+ km thick shear zone, possibly consistent with low velocity zones observed in modern subduction zones, despite subducting along a sediment poor, tectonically erosive margin. Periodic strain localization occurred when rheological heterogeneities (i.e., km‐scale ultramafic lenses) entered the interface, facilitating underplating that preserved 10%–60% of the incoming sediment. Modern mass and volatile budgets do not account for erosive margin underplating, so improved quantification is crucial for predicting mass and volatile net flux to Earth′s interior.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009463exhumed subduction complexplate interface rheologystructural geologysubduction erosionunderplating processes
spellingShingle C. M. Tewksbury‐Christle
W. M. Behr
M. A. Helper
Tracking Deep Sediment Underplating in a Fossil Subduction Margin: Implications for Interface Rheology and Mass and Volatile Recycling
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
exhumed subduction complex
plate interface rheology
structural geology
subduction erosion
underplating processes
title Tracking Deep Sediment Underplating in a Fossil Subduction Margin: Implications for Interface Rheology and Mass and Volatile Recycling
title_full Tracking Deep Sediment Underplating in a Fossil Subduction Margin: Implications for Interface Rheology and Mass and Volatile Recycling
title_fullStr Tracking Deep Sediment Underplating in a Fossil Subduction Margin: Implications for Interface Rheology and Mass and Volatile Recycling
title_full_unstemmed Tracking Deep Sediment Underplating in a Fossil Subduction Margin: Implications for Interface Rheology and Mass and Volatile Recycling
title_short Tracking Deep Sediment Underplating in a Fossil Subduction Margin: Implications for Interface Rheology and Mass and Volatile Recycling
title_sort tracking deep sediment underplating in a fossil subduction margin implications for interface rheology and mass and volatile recycling
topic exhumed subduction complex
plate interface rheology
structural geology
subduction erosion
underplating processes
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009463
work_keys_str_mv AT cmtewksburychristle trackingdeepsedimentunderplatinginafossilsubductionmarginimplicationsforinterfacerheologyandmassandvolatilerecycling
AT wmbehr trackingdeepsedimentunderplatinginafossilsubductionmarginimplicationsforinterfacerheologyandmassandvolatilerecycling
AT mahelper trackingdeepsedimentunderplatinginafossilsubductionmarginimplicationsforinterfacerheologyandmassandvolatilerecycling