Salvage Case of Corpus Cavernosum Necrosis and Urethral Perforation associated with Infection after Penile Prosthesis Insertion

Summary:. Penile prosthesis implantation can be considered in patients with unsuccessful treatment with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction. Its associated postoperative complications include infection and urethral injury. Nevertheless, only a few studies have reported the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatsumi Kawaguchi, MD, Satoshi Kudoh, MD, PhD, Shoichi Ishikawa, MD, Shigeru Ichioka, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2023-03-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004863
Description
Summary:Summary:. Penile prosthesis implantation can be considered in patients with unsuccessful treatment with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction. Its associated postoperative complications include infection and urethral injury. Nevertheless, only a few studies have reported the successful management of severe cases. Herein, we report a case of corpus cavernosum necrosis and distal urethral perforation caused by infection after penile prosthesis insertion, which had favorable outcomes. A 60-year-old man with multiple atherosclerotic risks underwent penile prosthesis implantation for erectile dysfunction at another hospital. Postoperatively, he developed infectious necrosis and underwent prosthesis removal. However, he presented at our department because of technical difficulties in the treatment at other hospitals. The initial examination revealed extensive necrosis of the corpus cavernosum and perforation of the peripheral urethra. A thin urethral catheter was inserted, and the necrotic corpus cavernosum was debrided to preserve the artery and urethra. Then, the perforated urethra was sutured. Subsequent negative pressure wound therapy resulted in sufficient granulation and closure of the perforated urethra. One month after the surgery, the scar was resected and sutured following the circumcision line. Despite experiencing this severe postoperative complication, good functional and cosmetic outcomes were achieved after minimal surgery with a blood-flow–conserving method.
ISSN:2169-7574