Investigation of the Report Format for Spirometry in China and Recommendations for Improvement

Background Spirometry is the most common and extensively used pulmonary function test method, whose quality control is the cornerstone for its promotion and application. The report format is a key factor associated with the quality control of spirometry, but it is generally various in China, which i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lijuan LIANG, Wujun JIANG, Wenya CHEN, Ruibo HUANG, Peitao YE, Yongyi PENG, Xuedong LEI, Jianling LIANG, Yi GAO, Jinping ZHENG
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd 2022-06-01
Series:Zhongguo quanke yixue
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/yx202101415.pdf
_version_ 1797217145449349120
author Lijuan LIANG, Wujun JIANG, Wenya CHEN, Ruibo HUANG, Peitao YE, Yongyi PENG, Xuedong LEI, Jianling LIANG, Yi GAO, Jinping ZHENG
author_facet Lijuan LIANG, Wujun JIANG, Wenya CHEN, Ruibo HUANG, Peitao YE, Yongyi PENG, Xuedong LEI, Jianling LIANG, Yi GAO, Jinping ZHENG
author_sort Lijuan LIANG, Wujun JIANG, Wenya CHEN, Ruibo HUANG, Peitao YE, Yongyi PENG, Xuedong LEI, Jianling LIANG, Yi GAO, Jinping ZHENG
collection DOAJ
description Background Spirometry is the most common and extensively used pulmonary function test method, whose quality control is the cornerstone for its promotion and application. The report format is a key factor associated with the quality control of spirometry, but it is generally various in China, which is not conducive to the popularization and application of spirometry. Objective To assess the current status of report formats for spirometry in Chinese mainland. Methods The reports of spirometry were collected from some hospitals in China between April 2016 and December 2018, which are composed of four parts, including the general demographic information, test indicators, graphs, and results evaluation. The key and/or essential information for each part is as follows: (1) the general demographicinformation part: sex, height, BMI, age and the reference source; (2) test indicators part: forced vital capacity (FVC) , forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) , the ratio of FEV1/FVC or FEV1/VCmax, maximal mid-expiratory flow〔FEF25%-75%, forced expiratory flow at 50% (FEF50%) , forced expiratory flow at 75% (FEF75%) 〕, peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and forced expiratory time (FET) ; (3) graphs part: flow-volume curve (F-V curve) and volume-time curve (V-T curve) ; (4) results evaluation part: subjects cooperation, test quality control level, and physician interpretation. The differences in the report format of spirometry were compared by region and hospital level in this study. Results In total, 1 562 spirometry reports from 1 562 hospitals (one from each hospital) across China were enrolled, but only 0.4% provided all key indicators. (1) For the general demographic information part, only 27.7% reports provided complete key indicators, which differed significantly by regions and the level of hospitals (P<0.05) . Moreover, the part showed the reference source only accounted for 28.2%. (2) Furthermore, in the test indicators part, 91.9% of the total reports provided all key indicators. More than 90.0% reports listed FEF25%-75%, FEF50% and/or FEF75%, while the PIF and FET was reported in 36.4%, 46.0%, respectively. (3) In terms of the graphs part, 73.4% reports provided key indicators, but 26.6% did not report the important information like V-T curve. (4) Finally, in the results evaluation part, the report without lacking key indicators were only accounted for 1.6%, and there were great differences between hospitals of different levels (P<0.05) . What's more, only 14.9% clearly showed the quality control of spirometry. Conclusion There were great differences of the report formats for spirometry analyzed and the 2019 Standard for pulmonary function examination report. Lack of the key information such as the reference resource, inspiratory phase indicators, the indicators about quality control and quality control of test would seriously affect the clinical value of spirometry. Therefore, it is suggested to add the program of report format standards during the standardized trainings of pulmonary function testing, and strengthen the understanding and application of various indicators of spirometry among pulmonary function practitioners.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T11:57:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c189cd191af45b7a77aaee62366ddc1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1007-9572
language zho
last_indexed 2024-04-24T11:57:12Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd
record_format Article
series Zhongguo quanke yixue
spelling doaj.art-0c189cd191af45b7a77aaee62366ddc12024-04-09T03:28:57ZzhoChinese General Practice Publishing House Co., LtdZhongguo quanke yixue1007-95722022-06-0125172173217810.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.01.415Investigation of the Report Format for Spirometry in China and Recommendations for ImprovementLijuan LIANG, Wujun JIANG, Wenya CHEN, Ruibo HUANG, Peitao YE, Yongyi PENG, Xuedong LEI, Jianling LIANG, Yi GAO, Jinping ZHENG01.The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University/National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease/National Respiratory Medical Center/State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease/Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou 510120, China;2.Suzhou Wujiang District Children's Hospital/Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, ChinaBackground Spirometry is the most common and extensively used pulmonary function test method, whose quality control is the cornerstone for its promotion and application. The report format is a key factor associated with the quality control of spirometry, but it is generally various in China, which is not conducive to the popularization and application of spirometry. Objective To assess the current status of report formats for spirometry in Chinese mainland. Methods The reports of spirometry were collected from some hospitals in China between April 2016 and December 2018, which are composed of four parts, including the general demographic information, test indicators, graphs, and results evaluation. The key and/or essential information for each part is as follows: (1) the general demographicinformation part: sex, height, BMI, age and the reference source; (2) test indicators part: forced vital capacity (FVC) , forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) , the ratio of FEV1/FVC or FEV1/VCmax, maximal mid-expiratory flow〔FEF25%-75%, forced expiratory flow at 50% (FEF50%) , forced expiratory flow at 75% (FEF75%) 〕, peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and forced expiratory time (FET) ; (3) graphs part: flow-volume curve (F-V curve) and volume-time curve (V-T curve) ; (4) results evaluation part: subjects cooperation, test quality control level, and physician interpretation. The differences in the report format of spirometry were compared by region and hospital level in this study. Results In total, 1 562 spirometry reports from 1 562 hospitals (one from each hospital) across China were enrolled, but only 0.4% provided all key indicators. (1) For the general demographic information part, only 27.7% reports provided complete key indicators, which differed significantly by regions and the level of hospitals (P<0.05) . Moreover, the part showed the reference source only accounted for 28.2%. (2) Furthermore, in the test indicators part, 91.9% of the total reports provided all key indicators. More than 90.0% reports listed FEF25%-75%, FEF50% and/or FEF75%, while the PIF and FET was reported in 36.4%, 46.0%, respectively. (3) In terms of the graphs part, 73.4% reports provided key indicators, but 26.6% did not report the important information like V-T curve. (4) Finally, in the results evaluation part, the report without lacking key indicators were only accounted for 1.6%, and there were great differences between hospitals of different levels (P<0.05) . What's more, only 14.9% clearly showed the quality control of spirometry. Conclusion There were great differences of the report formats for spirometry analyzed and the 2019 Standard for pulmonary function examination report. Lack of the key information such as the reference resource, inspiratory phase indicators, the indicators about quality control and quality control of test would seriously affect the clinical value of spirometry. Therefore, it is suggested to add the program of report format standards during the standardized trainings of pulmonary function testing, and strengthen the understanding and application of various indicators of spirometry among pulmonary function practitioners.https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/yx202101415.pdfspirometry|breath tests|spirometry report|format|standardization
spellingShingle Lijuan LIANG, Wujun JIANG, Wenya CHEN, Ruibo HUANG, Peitao YE, Yongyi PENG, Xuedong LEI, Jianling LIANG, Yi GAO, Jinping ZHENG
Investigation of the Report Format for Spirometry in China and Recommendations for Improvement
Zhongguo quanke yixue
spirometry|breath tests|spirometry report|format|standardization
title Investigation of the Report Format for Spirometry in China and Recommendations for Improvement
title_full Investigation of the Report Format for Spirometry in China and Recommendations for Improvement
title_fullStr Investigation of the Report Format for Spirometry in China and Recommendations for Improvement
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the Report Format for Spirometry in China and Recommendations for Improvement
title_short Investigation of the Report Format for Spirometry in China and Recommendations for Improvement
title_sort investigation of the report format for spirometry in china and recommendations for improvement
topic spirometry|breath tests|spirometry report|format|standardization
url https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/yx202101415.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lijuanliangwujunjiangwenyachenruibohuangpeitaoyeyongyipengxuedongleijianlingliangyigaojinpingzheng investigationofthereportformatforspirometryinchinaandrecommendationsforimprovement