More than meets the eye: visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic pain

Samantha R Fashler, Joel Katz Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, CanadaAbstract: The present study used eye-tracking technology to assess whether individuals who report chronic pain direct more attention to sensory pain-related words than do pain-free individuals. A total of 113...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fashler SR, Katz J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2014-09-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/more-than-meets-the-eye-visual-attention-biases-in-individuals-reporti-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
_version_ 1828214329131925504
author Fashler SR
Katz J
author_facet Fashler SR
Katz J
author_sort Fashler SR
collection DOAJ
description Samantha R Fashler, Joel Katz Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, CanadaAbstract: The present study used eye-tracking technology to assess whether individuals who report chronic pain direct more attention to sensory pain-related words than do pain-free individuals. A total of 113 participants (51 with chronic pain, 62 pain-free) were recruited. Participants completed a dot-probe task, viewing neutral and sensory pain-related words while their reaction time and eye movements were recorded. Eye-tracking data were analyzed by mixed-design analysis of variance with group (chronic pain versus pain-free) as the between-subjects factor, and word type (sensory pain versus neutral) as the within-subjects factor. Results showed a significant main effect for word type: all participants attended to pain-related words more than neutral words on several eye-tracking parameters. The group main effect was significant for number of fixations, which was greater in the chronic pain group. Finally, the group by word type interaction effect was significant for average visit duration, number of fixations, and total late-phase duration, all greater for sensory pain versus neutral words in the chronic pain group. As well, participants with chronic pain fixated significantly more frequently on pain words than did pain-free participants. In contrast, none of the effects for reaction time were significant. The results support the hypothesis that individuals with chronic pain display specific attentional biases toward pain-related stimuli and demonstrate the value of eye-tracking technology in measuring differences in visual attention variables.Keywords: attention, chronic pain, dot-probe task, eye-tracking
first_indexed 2024-04-12T15:02:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c19b02a7ca147bdb452ee38ca5dadaa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-7090
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T15:02:53Z
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Pain Research
spelling doaj.art-0c19b02a7ca147bdb452ee38ca5dadaa2022-12-22T03:28:02ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902014-09-012014default55757018416More than meets the eye: visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic painFashler SRKatz JSamantha R Fashler, Joel Katz Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, CanadaAbstract: The present study used eye-tracking technology to assess whether individuals who report chronic pain direct more attention to sensory pain-related words than do pain-free individuals. A total of 113 participants (51 with chronic pain, 62 pain-free) were recruited. Participants completed a dot-probe task, viewing neutral and sensory pain-related words while their reaction time and eye movements were recorded. Eye-tracking data were analyzed by mixed-design analysis of variance with group (chronic pain versus pain-free) as the between-subjects factor, and word type (sensory pain versus neutral) as the within-subjects factor. Results showed a significant main effect for word type: all participants attended to pain-related words more than neutral words on several eye-tracking parameters. The group main effect was significant for number of fixations, which was greater in the chronic pain group. Finally, the group by word type interaction effect was significant for average visit duration, number of fixations, and total late-phase duration, all greater for sensory pain versus neutral words in the chronic pain group. As well, participants with chronic pain fixated significantly more frequently on pain words than did pain-free participants. In contrast, none of the effects for reaction time were significant. The results support the hypothesis that individuals with chronic pain display specific attentional biases toward pain-related stimuli and demonstrate the value of eye-tracking technology in measuring differences in visual attention variables.Keywords: attention, chronic pain, dot-probe task, eye-trackinghttp://www.dovepress.com/more-than-meets-the-eye-visual-attention-biases-in-individuals-reporti-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
spellingShingle Fashler SR
Katz J
More than meets the eye: visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic pain
Journal of Pain Research
title More than meets the eye: visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic pain
title_full More than meets the eye: visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic pain
title_fullStr More than meets the eye: visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic pain
title_full_unstemmed More than meets the eye: visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic pain
title_short More than meets the eye: visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic pain
title_sort more than meets the eye visual attention biases in individuals reporting chronic pain
url http://www.dovepress.com/more-than-meets-the-eye-visual-attention-biases-in-individuals-reporti-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
work_keys_str_mv AT fashlersr morethanmeetstheeyevisualattentionbiasesinindividualsreportingchronicpain
AT katzj morethanmeetstheeyevisualattentionbiasesinindividualsreportingchronicpain