Application of Hyperelastic Nodal Force Method to Evaluation of Aortic Valve Cusps Coaptation: Thin Shell vs. Membrane Formulations

Coaptation characteristics are crucial in an assessment of the competence of reconstructed aortic valves. Shell or membrane formulations can be used to model the valve cusps coaptation. In this paper we compare both formulations in terms of their coaptation characteristics for the first time. Our nu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuri Vassilevski, Alexey Liogky, Victoria Salamatova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/12/1450
_version_ 1797529332223049728
author Yuri Vassilevski
Alexey Liogky
Victoria Salamatova
author_facet Yuri Vassilevski
Alexey Liogky
Victoria Salamatova
author_sort Yuri Vassilevski
collection DOAJ
description Coaptation characteristics are crucial in an assessment of the competence of reconstructed aortic valves. Shell or membrane formulations can be used to model the valve cusps coaptation. In this paper we compare both formulations in terms of their coaptation characteristics for the first time. Our numerical thin shell model is based on a combination of the hyperelastic nodal forces method and the rotation-free finite elements. The shell model is verified on several popular benchmarks for thin-shell analysis. The relative error with respect to reference solutions does not exceed 1–2%. We apply our numerical shell and membrane formulations to model the closure of an idealized aortic valve varying hyperelasticity models and their shear moduli. The coaptation characteristics become almost insensitive to elastic potentials and sensitive to bending stiffness, which reduces the coaptation zone.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:13:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c1d77e99a2a4a249178fc13ad0e6537
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7390
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:13:17Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Mathematics
spelling doaj.art-0c1d77e99a2a4a249178fc13ad0e65372023-11-22T01:01:50ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902021-06-01912145010.3390/math9121450Application of Hyperelastic Nodal Force Method to Evaluation of Aortic Valve Cusps Coaptation: Thin Shell vs. Membrane FormulationsYuri Vassilevski0Alexey Liogky1Victoria Salamatova2Marchuk Institute of Numerical Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, RussiaMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Dolgoprudny, RussiaMarchuk Institute of Numerical Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, RussiaCoaptation characteristics are crucial in an assessment of the competence of reconstructed aortic valves. Shell or membrane formulations can be used to model the valve cusps coaptation. In this paper we compare both formulations in terms of their coaptation characteristics for the first time. Our numerical thin shell model is based on a combination of the hyperelastic nodal forces method and the rotation-free finite elements. The shell model is verified on several popular benchmarks for thin-shell analysis. The relative error with respect to reference solutions does not exceed 1–2%. We apply our numerical shell and membrane formulations to model the closure of an idealized aortic valve varying hyperelasticity models and their shear moduli. The coaptation characteristics become almost insensitive to elastic potentials and sensitive to bending stiffness, which reduces the coaptation zone.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/12/1450aortic valvecoaptationshellmembranemathematical modelinghyperelastic nodal force
spellingShingle Yuri Vassilevski
Alexey Liogky
Victoria Salamatova
Application of Hyperelastic Nodal Force Method to Evaluation of Aortic Valve Cusps Coaptation: Thin Shell vs. Membrane Formulations
Mathematics
aortic valve
coaptation
shell
membrane
mathematical modeling
hyperelastic nodal force
title Application of Hyperelastic Nodal Force Method to Evaluation of Aortic Valve Cusps Coaptation: Thin Shell vs. Membrane Formulations
title_full Application of Hyperelastic Nodal Force Method to Evaluation of Aortic Valve Cusps Coaptation: Thin Shell vs. Membrane Formulations
title_fullStr Application of Hyperelastic Nodal Force Method to Evaluation of Aortic Valve Cusps Coaptation: Thin Shell vs. Membrane Formulations
title_full_unstemmed Application of Hyperelastic Nodal Force Method to Evaluation of Aortic Valve Cusps Coaptation: Thin Shell vs. Membrane Formulations
title_short Application of Hyperelastic Nodal Force Method to Evaluation of Aortic Valve Cusps Coaptation: Thin Shell vs. Membrane Formulations
title_sort application of hyperelastic nodal force method to evaluation of aortic valve cusps coaptation thin shell vs membrane formulations
topic aortic valve
coaptation
shell
membrane
mathematical modeling
hyperelastic nodal force
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/12/1450
work_keys_str_mv AT yurivassilevski applicationofhyperelasticnodalforcemethodtoevaluationofaorticvalvecuspscoaptationthinshellvsmembraneformulations
AT alexeyliogky applicationofhyperelasticnodalforcemethodtoevaluationofaorticvalvecuspscoaptationthinshellvsmembraneformulations
AT victoriasalamatova applicationofhyperelasticnodalforcemethodtoevaluationofaorticvalvecuspscoaptationthinshellvsmembraneformulations