Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the field

Abstract Background “Atypical cells” parameter in automated urinalysis has recently been introduced. An instrument capable of measuring quantitative and qualitative features of nuclear and cytoplasmic properties of a cell has the potential to detect cellular atypia. Instruments using flow cytometry...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ozgur Aydin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:Diagnostic Pathology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-021-01068-5
_version_ 1818676124867100672
author Ozgur Aydin
author_facet Ozgur Aydin
author_sort Ozgur Aydin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background “Atypical cells” parameter in automated urinalysis has recently been introduced. An instrument capable of measuring quantitative and qualitative features of nuclear and cytoplasmic properties of a cell has the potential to detect cellular atypia. Instruments using flow cytometry have been detecting atypical cells in blood for a long time; yet instruments using the same methodology very lately developed this parameter in urinalysis. Materials and methods Samples with an atypical cells value higher than 1 atypical cell/µL were included in the study. Besides automated urinalysis, every sample was reflexed to modular unit for digital imaging. The remainder of each sample was stained with Sternheimer dye and examined manually under a light microscope. Results 50 samples with higher than1 atypical cell/µL result were included in the study. Patients were composed of 43 females (86 %) and 7 males (14 %). The mean age was 47.12 ± 19.45 years. The median atypical cells value was 1.8/µL (95 % range 1.5–2.4/µL). Manual microscopic evaluation of the 50 samples showed atypical cells in 1 sample. The patient had papillary lesions on cystoscopy and pathology report informed a high grade urothelial carcinoma. Other 49 samples were negative for atypical cells in manual microscopy. They were crowded samples with leucocytes and squamous epithelial cells. Conclusions The positive case provided evidence for Sysmex UN’s capability to detect atypical cells in urine. The negative cases presented clues that probable vulvovaginal contamination and crowded specimens could be deceptive for Sysmex UN in this particular parameter.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T08:38:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c200407079f4dc8bed94e606df01ff9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1746-1596
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T08:38:30Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Diagnostic Pathology
spelling doaj.art-0c200407079f4dc8bed94e606df01ff92022-12-21T21:56:24ZengBMCDiagnostic Pathology1746-15962021-01-011611510.1186/s13000-021-01068-5Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the fieldOzgur Aydin0Central Laboratory, Kepez Public HospitalAbstract Background “Atypical cells” parameter in automated urinalysis has recently been introduced. An instrument capable of measuring quantitative and qualitative features of nuclear and cytoplasmic properties of a cell has the potential to detect cellular atypia. Instruments using flow cytometry have been detecting atypical cells in blood for a long time; yet instruments using the same methodology very lately developed this parameter in urinalysis. Materials and methods Samples with an atypical cells value higher than 1 atypical cell/µL were included in the study. Besides automated urinalysis, every sample was reflexed to modular unit for digital imaging. The remainder of each sample was stained with Sternheimer dye and examined manually under a light microscope. Results 50 samples with higher than1 atypical cell/µL result were included in the study. Patients were composed of 43 females (86 %) and 7 males (14 %). The mean age was 47.12 ± 19.45 years. The median atypical cells value was 1.8/µL (95 % range 1.5–2.4/µL). Manual microscopic evaluation of the 50 samples showed atypical cells in 1 sample. The patient had papillary lesions on cystoscopy and pathology report informed a high grade urothelial carcinoma. Other 49 samples were negative for atypical cells in manual microscopy. They were crowded samples with leucocytes and squamous epithelial cells. Conclusions The positive case provided evidence for Sysmex UN’s capability to detect atypical cells in urine. The negative cases presented clues that probable vulvovaginal contamination and crowded specimens could be deceptive for Sysmex UN in this particular parameter.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-021-01068-5Atypical cellsAutomated analyzerCancerCytologyUrinalysisUrothelial carcinoma
spellingShingle Ozgur Aydin
Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the field
Diagnostic Pathology
Atypical cells
Automated analyzer
Cancer
Cytology
Urinalysis
Urothelial carcinoma
title Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the field
title_full Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the field
title_fullStr Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the field
title_full_unstemmed Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the field
title_short Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the field
title_sort atypical cells parameter in sysmex un automated urine analyzer feedback from the field
topic Atypical cells
Automated analyzer
Cancer
Cytology
Urinalysis
Urothelial carcinoma
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-021-01068-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ozguraydin atypicalcellsparameterinsysmexunautomatedurineanalyzerfeedbackfromthefield