Scoring Assessments in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Epidermal necrolysis, the unifying term for Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), is a severe cutaneous drug reaction associated with high morbidity and mortality. Given the rarity of this disease, large-scale prospective research studies are limited. Significant insti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allison S. Dobry, Sonia Himed, Margo Waters, Benjamin H. Kaffenberger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.883121/full
_version_ 1811337372712828928
author Allison S. Dobry
Sonia Himed
Margo Waters
Benjamin H. Kaffenberger
Benjamin H. Kaffenberger
author_facet Allison S. Dobry
Sonia Himed
Margo Waters
Benjamin H. Kaffenberger
Benjamin H. Kaffenberger
author_sort Allison S. Dobry
collection DOAJ
description Epidermal necrolysis, the unifying term for Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), is a severe cutaneous drug reaction associated with high morbidity and mortality. Given the rarity of this disease, large-scale prospective research studies are limited. Significant institutional and geographical variations in treatment practices highlight the need for standardization of clinical assessment scores and prioritization of research outcome measures in epidermal necrolysis. At the present, clinical assessment is typically simplified to total body surface area (BSA) involvement, with little focus on morphology. Validated clinical scoring systems are used as mortality prognostication tools, with SCORTEN being the best-validated tool thus far, although the ABCD-10 has also been recently introduced. These tools are imperfect in that they tend to either overestimate or underestimate mortality in certain populations and are not designed to monitor disease progression. Although mortality is often used as a primary endpoint for epidermal necrolysis studies, this outcome fails to capture more nuanced changes in skin disease such as arrest of disease progression while also lacking a validated skin-directed inclusion criterion to stratify patients based on the severity of skin disease at study entry. In addition to mortality, many studies also use BSA stabilization or time to re-epithelialization as endpoints, although these are not clearly defined morphologically, and inter- and intra-rater reliability are unclear. More specific, validated cutaneous assessment scores are necessary in order advance therapeutic options for epidermal necrolysis. In this review, we summarize the strengths and weaknesses of current clinical assessment practices in epidermal necrolysis and highlight the need for standardized research tools to monitor cutaneous involvement throughout the hospitalization.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:53:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c3574d86132499eb7652a758384e481
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-858X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:53:56Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj.art-0c3574d86132499eb7652a758384e4812022-12-22T02:36:35ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2022-06-01910.3389/fmed.2022.883121883121Scoring Assessments in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal NecrolysisAllison S. Dobry0Sonia Himed1Margo Waters2Benjamin H. Kaffenberger3Benjamin H. Kaffenberger4Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDivision of Dermatology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United StatesOhio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United StatesDivision of Dermatology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United StatesOhio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United StatesEpidermal necrolysis, the unifying term for Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), is a severe cutaneous drug reaction associated with high morbidity and mortality. Given the rarity of this disease, large-scale prospective research studies are limited. Significant institutional and geographical variations in treatment practices highlight the need for standardization of clinical assessment scores and prioritization of research outcome measures in epidermal necrolysis. At the present, clinical assessment is typically simplified to total body surface area (BSA) involvement, with little focus on morphology. Validated clinical scoring systems are used as mortality prognostication tools, with SCORTEN being the best-validated tool thus far, although the ABCD-10 has also been recently introduced. These tools are imperfect in that they tend to either overestimate or underestimate mortality in certain populations and are not designed to monitor disease progression. Although mortality is often used as a primary endpoint for epidermal necrolysis studies, this outcome fails to capture more nuanced changes in skin disease such as arrest of disease progression while also lacking a validated skin-directed inclusion criterion to stratify patients based on the severity of skin disease at study entry. In addition to mortality, many studies also use BSA stabilization or time to re-epithelialization as endpoints, although these are not clearly defined morphologically, and inter- and intra-rater reliability are unclear. More specific, validated cutaneous assessment scores are necessary in order advance therapeutic options for epidermal necrolysis. In this review, we summarize the strengths and weaknesses of current clinical assessment practices in epidermal necrolysis and highlight the need for standardized research tools to monitor cutaneous involvement throughout the hospitalization.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.883121/fullSJS/TENscoring assessmentdrug reactionepidermal necrolysisdermatology
spellingShingle Allison S. Dobry
Sonia Himed
Margo Waters
Benjamin H. Kaffenberger
Benjamin H. Kaffenberger
Scoring Assessments in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
Frontiers in Medicine
SJS/TEN
scoring assessment
drug reaction
epidermal necrolysis
dermatology
title Scoring Assessments in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
title_full Scoring Assessments in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
title_fullStr Scoring Assessments in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
title_full_unstemmed Scoring Assessments in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
title_short Scoring Assessments in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
title_sort scoring assessments in stevens johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis
topic SJS/TEN
scoring assessment
drug reaction
epidermal necrolysis
dermatology
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.883121/full
work_keys_str_mv AT allisonsdobry scoringassessmentsinstevensjohnsonsyndromeandtoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT soniahimed scoringassessmentsinstevensjohnsonsyndromeandtoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT margowaters scoringassessmentsinstevensjohnsonsyndromeandtoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT benjaminhkaffenberger scoringassessmentsinstevensjohnsonsyndromeandtoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT benjaminhkaffenberger scoringassessmentsinstevensjohnsonsyndromeandtoxicepidermalnecrolysis