Imagineering waterscapes: The case of the Dutch water sector

This article explores the imagineering of waterscapes using a cultural political economy (CPE) approach. 'Imagineering' is a portmanteau of imagining and engineering, and a 'waterscape' is taken to be a produced hydrosocial entity. On the one hand, then, imagineering waterscapes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chris Büscher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Water Alternatives Association 2019-10-01
Series:Water Alternatives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/volume-12/v12issue3/559-a12-3-15/file
_version_ 1819030785087242240
author Chris Büscher
author_facet Chris Büscher
author_sort Chris Büscher
collection DOAJ
description This article explores the imagineering of waterscapes using a cultural political economy (CPE) approach. 'Imagineering' is a portmanteau of imagining and engineering, and a 'waterscape' is taken to be a produced hydrosocial entity. On the one hand, then, imagineering waterscapes involves construing a hydrosocial imaginary based on material realities; on the other, such an imaginary itself ought to have performative and material effects. This article is primarily concerned with imagineering waterscapes at the national scale, taking the Dutch Water Sector (DWS) as a case in point. The article examines elements of the Netherlands' water history, geography, agential configurations, and the water infrastructural and conceptual inventions that serve as selectivities in the DWS imaginary. Anticipated performative effects of this DWS imaginary include gaining a competitive edge in the world market for water-related products and services and an enhanced power position in global water networks. The DWS case therefore illustrates how imagineering is simultaneously a cultural and political economic process or 'tactic', aimed at seducing prospective (business) partners into 'buying' particular hydrosocial visions and arrangements. I argue that imagineering is a strategic and potentially powerful tool in todayʼs intensified discursive struggles about how water (crises) ought to be seen and treated. But todayʼs focus on imagineering can also partly be explained as having replaced more coercive tactics (such as tied aid) that were once commonly used in the pursuit of Dutch water interests abroad. This is not to say that imagineering is somehow less political; our examination of this case shows how the politics of privileging and marginalising and of forgetting and remembering are engrained in the process of imagineering waterscapes.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T06:35:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c5206ef85934fdabc6042f27df5d9aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1965-0175
1965-0175
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T06:35:40Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Water Alternatives Association
record_format Article
series Water Alternatives
spelling doaj.art-0c5206ef85934fdabc6042f27df5d9aa2022-12-21T19:12:52ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752019-10-01123814835Imagineering waterscapes: The case of the Dutch water sectorChris Büscher0SOAS University of London, London, UKThis article explores the imagineering of waterscapes using a cultural political economy (CPE) approach. 'Imagineering' is a portmanteau of imagining and engineering, and a 'waterscape' is taken to be a produced hydrosocial entity. On the one hand, then, imagineering waterscapes involves construing a hydrosocial imaginary based on material realities; on the other, such an imaginary itself ought to have performative and material effects. This article is primarily concerned with imagineering waterscapes at the national scale, taking the Dutch Water Sector (DWS) as a case in point. The article examines elements of the Netherlands' water history, geography, agential configurations, and the water infrastructural and conceptual inventions that serve as selectivities in the DWS imaginary. Anticipated performative effects of this DWS imaginary include gaining a competitive edge in the world market for water-related products and services and an enhanced power position in global water networks. The DWS case therefore illustrates how imagineering is simultaneously a cultural and political economic process or 'tactic', aimed at seducing prospective (business) partners into 'buying' particular hydrosocial visions and arrangements. I argue that imagineering is a strategic and potentially powerful tool in todayʼs intensified discursive struggles about how water (crises) ought to be seen and treated. But todayʼs focus on imagineering can also partly be explained as having replaced more coercive tactics (such as tied aid) that were once commonly used in the pursuit of Dutch water interests abroad. This is not to say that imagineering is somehow less political; our examination of this case shows how the politics of privileging and marginalising and of forgetting and remembering are engrained in the process of imagineering waterscapes.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/volume-12/v12issue3/559-a12-3-15/fileImagineeringwaterscapecultural political economyDutch Water Sector
spellingShingle Chris Büscher
Imagineering waterscapes: The case of the Dutch water sector
Water Alternatives
Imagineering
waterscape
cultural political economy
Dutch Water Sector
title Imagineering waterscapes: The case of the Dutch water sector
title_full Imagineering waterscapes: The case of the Dutch water sector
title_fullStr Imagineering waterscapes: The case of the Dutch water sector
title_full_unstemmed Imagineering waterscapes: The case of the Dutch water sector
title_short Imagineering waterscapes: The case of the Dutch water sector
title_sort imagineering waterscapes the case of the dutch water sector
topic Imagineering
waterscape
cultural political economy
Dutch Water Sector
url http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/volume-12/v12issue3/559-a12-3-15/file
work_keys_str_mv AT chrisbuscher imagineeringwaterscapesthecaseofthedutchwatersector