Critical Analysis of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Case Studies in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania

The concept of payments for ecosystem services (PES) has been identified as a promising mechanism for use in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania, with several potential advantages and benefits, including the ability to raise new funding for landscape management, increase the efficiency of conservation appro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ibrahim Osewe, Aureliu-Florin Hălălișan, Nicolae Talpă, Bogdan Popa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/6/1209
_version_ 1797594706905923584
author Ibrahim Osewe
Aureliu-Florin Hălălișan
Nicolae Talpă
Bogdan Popa
author_facet Ibrahim Osewe
Aureliu-Florin Hălălișan
Nicolae Talpă
Bogdan Popa
author_sort Ibrahim Osewe
collection DOAJ
description The concept of payments for ecosystem services (PES) has been identified as a promising mechanism for use in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania, with several potential advantages and benefits, including the ability to raise new funding for landscape management, increase the efficiency of conservation approaches, secure ecosystem services (ES), and benefit poor rural communities. Starting from understanding the complex relationship between human dependence on natural resources and the environment, this paper aims to determine the degree to which the various criteria affect the success of PES that involve forests. Primary data were collected using a mixed questionnaire that was sent to institutions that had implemented PES schemes in the region and 25 case studies of PES implemented in the region from various publications were used for the secondary data. The data were mainly analyzed using comparative analysis. The results indicated that PES success is higher when bundled ES are considered, financing is medium- to long-term, implementation is at the regional level, combined transaction types (cash and in-kind) are used, and both private buyers and public sellers are involved. This paper provides a good benchmark for decision makers on PES performance and the model presented may serve as one of the tools for improving livelihoods and ensuring the achievement of sustainable development goals.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:27:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c5a1afc83c347929ad10417c697c3b4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:27:04Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-0c5a1afc83c347929ad10417c697c3b42023-11-18T10:27:51ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072023-06-01146120910.3390/f14061209Critical Analysis of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Case Studies in Kenya, Uganda and TanzaniaIbrahim Osewe0Aureliu-Florin Hălălișan1Nicolae Talpă2Bogdan Popa3Department of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brașov, Șirul Beethoven No. 1, 500123 Brașov, RomaniaDepartment of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brașov, Șirul Beethoven No. 1, 500123 Brașov, RomaniaDepartment of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brașov, Șirul Beethoven No. 1, 500123 Brașov, RomaniaDepartment of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brașov, Șirul Beethoven No. 1, 500123 Brașov, RomaniaThe concept of payments for ecosystem services (PES) has been identified as a promising mechanism for use in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania, with several potential advantages and benefits, including the ability to raise new funding for landscape management, increase the efficiency of conservation approaches, secure ecosystem services (ES), and benefit poor rural communities. Starting from understanding the complex relationship between human dependence on natural resources and the environment, this paper aims to determine the degree to which the various criteria affect the success of PES that involve forests. Primary data were collected using a mixed questionnaire that was sent to institutions that had implemented PES schemes in the region and 25 case studies of PES implemented in the region from various publications were used for the secondary data. The data were mainly analyzed using comparative analysis. The results indicated that PES success is higher when bundled ES are considered, financing is medium- to long-term, implementation is at the regional level, combined transaction types (cash and in-kind) are used, and both private buyers and public sellers are involved. This paper provides a good benchmark for decision makers on PES performance and the model presented may serve as one of the tools for improving livelihoods and ensuring the achievement of sustainable development goals.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/6/1209forest ecosystem servicespayments for ecosystem servicesconservation efficiencyrural communitieslivelihood improvementdecision making
spellingShingle Ibrahim Osewe
Aureliu-Florin Hălălișan
Nicolae Talpă
Bogdan Popa
Critical Analysis of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Case Studies in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
Forests
forest ecosystem services
payments for ecosystem services
conservation efficiency
rural communities
livelihood improvement
decision making
title Critical Analysis of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Case Studies in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title_full Critical Analysis of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Case Studies in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title_fullStr Critical Analysis of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Case Studies in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Critical Analysis of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Case Studies in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title_short Critical Analysis of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Case Studies in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title_sort critical analysis of payments for ecosystem services case studies in kenya uganda and tanzania
topic forest ecosystem services
payments for ecosystem services
conservation efficiency
rural communities
livelihood improvement
decision making
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/6/1209
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimosewe criticalanalysisofpaymentsforecosystemservicescasestudiesinkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT aureliuflorinhalalisan criticalanalysisofpaymentsforecosystemservicescasestudiesinkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT nicolaetalpa criticalanalysisofpaymentsforecosystemservicescasestudiesinkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT bogdanpopa criticalanalysisofpaymentsforecosystemservicescasestudiesinkenyaugandaandtanzania