Desirable attributes of theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design in healthcare: a scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Background: Implementation strategies can facilitate the adoption of evidence-based practices and policies. A wide range of theoretical approaches—theories, models, and frameworks—can be used to inform implementation strategy design in different ways (e.g., guiding barrier and enabler assessment to...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | F1000Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/11-1003/v1 |
| _version_ | 1827890991183429632 |
|---|---|
| author | Moriah E. Ellen Ève Bourbeau-Allard Anne Spinewine Joshua Porat-Dahlerbruch Guillaume Fontaine Jeremy M. Grimshaw |
| author_facet | Moriah E. Ellen Ève Bourbeau-Allard Anne Spinewine Joshua Porat-Dahlerbruch Guillaume Fontaine Jeremy M. Grimshaw |
| author_sort | Moriah E. Ellen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Implementation strategies can facilitate the adoption of evidence-based practices and policies. A wide range of theoretical approaches—theories, models, and frameworks—can be used to inform implementation strategy design in different ways (e.g., guiding barrier and enabler assessment to implementing evidence-based interventions). While selection criteria and attributes of theoretical approaches for use in implementation strategy design have been studied, they have never been synthesized. Furthermore, theoretical approaches have never been classified according to desirable criteria and attributes for use in implementation strategy design. This scoping review aims to a) identify the literature reporting on the selection of theoretical approaches for informing implementation strategy design in healthcare and b) understand the suggested use of these approaches in implementation strategy design. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines will be used to conduct this scoping review. A search of three bibliographical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL) will be conducted for peer-reviewed discussion, methods, protocol, or review papers. Data will be managed using the Covidence software. Two review team members will independently perform screening, full text review and data extraction. Results: Results will include a list of selection criteria and attributes of theoretical approaches for use in research on implementation strategy design. Descriptive data regarding selection criteria and attributes will be synthesized graphically and in table format. Data regarding the suggested use of theoretical approaches in implementation strategy design will be presented narratively. Conclusions: Results will be used to classify existing theoretical approaches according to the attributes and selection criteria identified in this scoping review. Envisioned next steps include an online tool that will be created to assist researchers in selecting theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T21:18:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0c60d8ea159f43708f8c617c74b21186 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2046-1402 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T21:18:26Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | F1000 Research Ltd |
| record_format | Article |
| series | F1000Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-0c60d8ea159f43708f8c617c74b211862023-07-29T00:00:00ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022022-09-0111137056Desirable attributes of theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design in healthcare: a scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]Moriah E. Ellen0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7127-7283Ève Bourbeau-Allard1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8515-8565Anne Spinewine2Joshua Porat-Dahlerbruch3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8273-9399Guillaume Fontaine4Jeremy M. Grimshaw5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8015-8243Department of Health Policy and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, 8410501, IsraelCentre for Nursing Research, Jewish General Hospital, CIUSSS West-Central Montreal, Quebec, CanadaClinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute,, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain, BelgiumDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, 8410501, IsraelCentre for Implementation Research, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaCentre for Implementation Research, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaBackground: Implementation strategies can facilitate the adoption of evidence-based practices and policies. A wide range of theoretical approaches—theories, models, and frameworks—can be used to inform implementation strategy design in different ways (e.g., guiding barrier and enabler assessment to implementing evidence-based interventions). While selection criteria and attributes of theoretical approaches for use in implementation strategy design have been studied, they have never been synthesized. Furthermore, theoretical approaches have never been classified according to desirable criteria and attributes for use in implementation strategy design. This scoping review aims to a) identify the literature reporting on the selection of theoretical approaches for informing implementation strategy design in healthcare and b) understand the suggested use of these approaches in implementation strategy design. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines will be used to conduct this scoping review. A search of three bibliographical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL) will be conducted for peer-reviewed discussion, methods, protocol, or review papers. Data will be managed using the Covidence software. Two review team members will independently perform screening, full text review and data extraction. Results: Results will include a list of selection criteria and attributes of theoretical approaches for use in research on implementation strategy design. Descriptive data regarding selection criteria and attributes will be synthesized graphically and in table format. Data regarding the suggested use of theoretical approaches in implementation strategy design will be presented narratively. Conclusions: Results will be used to classify existing theoretical approaches according to the attributes and selection criteria identified in this scoping review. Envisioned next steps include an online tool that will be created to assist researchers in selecting theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design.https://f1000research.com/articles/11-1003/v1implementation; implementation science; review; theory; evidence-based practice; literature review; protocol; knowledge translationeng |
| spellingShingle | Moriah E. Ellen Ève Bourbeau-Allard Anne Spinewine Joshua Porat-Dahlerbruch Guillaume Fontaine Jeremy M. Grimshaw Desirable attributes of theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design in healthcare: a scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] F1000Research implementation; implementation science; review; theory; evidence-based practice; literature review; protocol; knowledge translation eng |
| title | Desirable attributes of theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design in healthcare: a scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_full | Desirable attributes of theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design in healthcare: a scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_fullStr | Desirable attributes of theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design in healthcare: a scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_full_unstemmed | Desirable attributes of theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design in healthcare: a scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_short | Desirable attributes of theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design in healthcare: a scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_sort | desirable attributes of theories models and frameworks for implementation strategy design in healthcare a scoping review protocol version 1 peer review 1 approved 2 approved with reservations |
| topic | implementation; implementation science; review; theory; evidence-based practice; literature review; protocol; knowledge translation eng |
| url | https://f1000research.com/articles/11-1003/v1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT moriaheellen desirableattributesoftheoriesmodelsandframeworksforimplementationstrategydesigninhealthcareascopingreviewprotocolversion1peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations AT evebourbeauallard desirableattributesoftheoriesmodelsandframeworksforimplementationstrategydesigninhealthcareascopingreviewprotocolversion1peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations AT annespinewine desirableattributesoftheoriesmodelsandframeworksforimplementationstrategydesigninhealthcareascopingreviewprotocolversion1peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations AT joshuaporatdahlerbruch desirableattributesoftheoriesmodelsandframeworksforimplementationstrategydesigninhealthcareascopingreviewprotocolversion1peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations AT guillaumefontaine desirableattributesoftheoriesmodelsandframeworksforimplementationstrategydesigninhealthcareascopingreviewprotocolversion1peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations AT jeremymgrimshaw desirableattributesoftheoriesmodelsandframeworksforimplementationstrategydesigninhealthcareascopingreviewprotocolversion1peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations |