2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To review the multiple differences between traditional research design and on the ground pragmatic trials. To review two pragmatic projects, identify core assumptions and to contrast assumptions with the reality of conducting T3 and T4 research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Ob...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodger S. Kessler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866118002133/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156682928029696
author Rodger S. Kessler
author_facet Rodger S. Kessler
author_sort Rodger S. Kessler
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To review the multiple differences between traditional research design and on the ground pragmatic trials. To review two pragmatic projects, identify core assumptions and to contrast assumptions with the reality of conducting T3 and T4 research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Observational mixed methods multi trial review of large multi site implementations. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The complexities of implementation on the ground were consistently greater than anticipated and required changing assumptions and research design elements. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Research findings are tremendously influenced by design and design implementation decisions. Anticipating the scope and breadth of the challenges will assist potential of successful implementation.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:55:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c6ffe19d7834432bf8e96ca73bcc7b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:55:29Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-0c6ffe19d7834432bf8e96ca73bcc7b02023-03-09T12:30:17ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612018-06-012565710.1017/cts.2018.2132136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trialsRodger S. Kessler0Arizona State UniversityOBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To review the multiple differences between traditional research design and on the ground pragmatic trials. To review two pragmatic projects, identify core assumptions and to contrast assumptions with the reality of conducting T3 and T4 research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Observational mixed methods multi trial review of large multi site implementations. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The complexities of implementation on the ground were consistently greater than anticipated and required changing assumptions and research design elements. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Research findings are tremendously influenced by design and design implementation decisions. Anticipating the scope and breadth of the challenges will assist potential of successful implementation.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866118002133/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Rodger S. Kessler
2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
title 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title_full 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title_fullStr 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title_full_unstemmed 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title_short 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title_sort 2136 frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866118002133/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT rodgerskessler 2136frequentlyoverlookedchallengesofpragmatictrials