Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in Switzerland

Background In 2015, in Switzerland the Suissano Health Programme was implemented in pig production to improve transparency for antimicrobial usage (AMU) and to reduce the usage of fluoroquinolones (FQ), macrolides and cephalosporins, representing highest priority critically important antimicrobials....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cedric Müntener, Thomas Echtermann, Xaver Sidler, Dolf Kümmerlen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-12-01
Series:Veterinary Record Open
Online Access:https://vetrecordopen.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000389.full
_version_ 1818827548086239232
author Cedric Müntener
Thomas Echtermann
Xaver Sidler
Dolf Kümmerlen
author_facet Cedric Müntener
Thomas Echtermann
Xaver Sidler
Dolf Kümmerlen
author_sort Cedric Müntener
collection DOAJ
description Background In 2015, in Switzerland the Suissano Health Programme was implemented in pig production to improve transparency for antimicrobial usage (AMU) and to reduce the usage of fluoroquinolones (FQ), macrolides and cephalosporins, representing highest priority critically important antimicrobials.Methods In the presented cohort study, the impact of the Suissano programme on the AMU of 291 pig farms between 2016 and 2017 was investigated. AMU was calculated in total numbers of defined course doses (nDCDch) for all farms in the programme. For each single farm the nDCDch/animal/year was determined for four different age categories (suckling piglets, weaned piglets, fattening pigs, sows) as well as each antimicrobial substance separately. Trends between 2016 and 2017 were investigated for all farms as well as the 25 per cent with the highest usage of antimicrobials (high users) separately.Results Total AMU measured in nDCDch declined by 23 per cent between 2016 and 2017, but statistically significant differences could not be observed when comparing the data sets of the individual farms. A significantly reduced usage of FQ could be demonstrated in suckling piglets (P=0.003), weaned piglets (P=0.006) and sows (P=0.008) in 2017 compared with 2016. For high users, a significant reduction of total AMU could be shown in suckling piglets (P=0.02), weaned piglets (P=0.0004) and fattening pigs (P=0.01).Conclusion This study demonstrated a significant reduction in the usage of FQs in suckling piglets, weaned piglets and sows as well as total AMU in suckling piglets, weaned piglets and fattening pigs on high-usage farms.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T00:45:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c74a3178d59477c83c46a3a33782063
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2052-6113
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T00:45:18Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Veterinary Record Open
spelling doaj.art-0c74a3178d59477c83c46a3a337820632022-12-21T20:44:18ZengWileyVeterinary Record Open2052-61132020-12-017110.1136/vetreco-2019-000389Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in SwitzerlandCedric Müntener0Thomas Echtermann1Xaver Sidler2Dolf Kümmerlen3Institute of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDivision of Swine Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDivision of Swine Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDivision of Swine Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandBackground In 2015, in Switzerland the Suissano Health Programme was implemented in pig production to improve transparency for antimicrobial usage (AMU) and to reduce the usage of fluoroquinolones (FQ), macrolides and cephalosporins, representing highest priority critically important antimicrobials.Methods In the presented cohort study, the impact of the Suissano programme on the AMU of 291 pig farms between 2016 and 2017 was investigated. AMU was calculated in total numbers of defined course doses (nDCDch) for all farms in the programme. For each single farm the nDCDch/animal/year was determined for four different age categories (suckling piglets, weaned piglets, fattening pigs, sows) as well as each antimicrobial substance separately. Trends between 2016 and 2017 were investigated for all farms as well as the 25 per cent with the highest usage of antimicrobials (high users) separately.Results Total AMU measured in nDCDch declined by 23 per cent between 2016 and 2017, but statistically significant differences could not be observed when comparing the data sets of the individual farms. A significantly reduced usage of FQ could be demonstrated in suckling piglets (P=0.003), weaned piglets (P=0.006) and sows (P=0.008) in 2017 compared with 2016. For high users, a significant reduction of total AMU could be shown in suckling piglets (P=0.02), weaned piglets (P=0.0004) and fattening pigs (P=0.01).Conclusion This study demonstrated a significant reduction in the usage of FQs in suckling piglets, weaned piglets and sows as well as total AMU in suckling piglets, weaned piglets and fattening pigs on high-usage farms.https://vetrecordopen.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000389.full
spellingShingle Cedric Müntener
Thomas Echtermann
Xaver Sidler
Dolf Kümmerlen
Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in Switzerland
Veterinary Record Open
title Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in Switzerland
title_full Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in Switzerland
title_fullStr Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in Switzerland
title_short Impact of the Suissano Health Programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in Switzerland
title_sort impact of the suissano health programme on antimicrobial usage on 291 pig farms in switzerland
url https://vetrecordopen.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000389.full
work_keys_str_mv AT cedricmuntener impactofthesuissanohealthprogrammeonantimicrobialusageon291pigfarmsinswitzerland
AT thomasechtermann impactofthesuissanohealthprogrammeonantimicrobialusageon291pigfarmsinswitzerland
AT xaversidler impactofthesuissanohealthprogrammeonantimicrobialusageon291pigfarmsinswitzerland
AT dolfkummerlen impactofthesuissanohealthprogrammeonantimicrobialusageon291pigfarmsinswitzerland