Selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder program

Abstract Background In broiler breeding, genotype-by-environment interaction is known to result in a genetic correlation between body weight measured in bio-secure and commercial environments that is substantially less than 1. Thus, measuring body weights on sibs of selection candidates in a commerc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlie A. de Hollander, Vivian P. Breen, John Henshall, Fernando B. Lopes, Mario PL. Calus
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:Genetics Selection Evolution
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00785-3
_version_ 1797865811946242048
author Charlie A. de Hollander
Vivian P. Breen
John Henshall
Fernando B. Lopes
Mario PL. Calus
author_facet Charlie A. de Hollander
Vivian P. Breen
John Henshall
Fernando B. Lopes
Mario PL. Calus
author_sort Charlie A. de Hollander
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In broiler breeding, genotype-by-environment interaction is known to result in a genetic correlation between body weight measured in bio-secure and commercial environments that is substantially less than 1. Thus, measuring body weights on sibs of selection candidates in a commercial environment and genotyping them could increase genetic progress. Using real data, the aim of this study was to evaluate which genotyping strategy and which proportion of sibs placed in the commercial environment should be genotyped to optimize a sib-testing breeding program in broilers. Phenotypic body weight and genomic information were collected on all sibs raised in a commercial environment, which allowed to retrospectively analyze different sampling strategies and genotyping proportions. Results Accuracies of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) obtained with the different genotyping strategies were assessed by computing their correlation with GEBV obtained when all sibs in the commercial environment were genotyped. Results showed that, compared to random sampling (RND), genotyping sibs with extreme phenotypes (EXT) resulted in higher GEBV accuracy across all genotyping proportions, especially for genotyping proportions of 12.5% or 25%, which resulted in correlations of 0.91 vs 0.88 for 12.5% and 0.94 vs 0.91 for 25% genotyped. Including pedigree on birds with phenotype in the commercial environment that were not genotyped increased accuracy at lower genotyping proportions, especially for the RND strategy (correlations of 0.88 vs 0.65 at 12.5% and 0.91 vs 0.80 at 25%), and a smaller but still substantial increase in accuracy for the EXT strategy (0.91 vs 0.79 for 12.5% and 0.94 vs 0.88 for 25% genotyped). Dispersion bias was virtually absent for RND if 25% or more birds were genotyped. However, GEBV were considerably inflated for EXT, especially when the proportion genotyped was low, which was further exacerbated if the pedigree of non-genotyped sibs was excluded. Conclusions When less than 75% of all animals placed in a commercial environment are genotyped, it is recommended to use the EXT strategy, because it yields the highest accuracy. However, caution should be taken when interpreting the resulting GEBV because they will be over-dispersed. When 75% or more of the animals are genotyped, random sampling is recommended because it yields virtually no bias of GEBV and results in similar accuracies as the EXT strategy.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:14:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0c75314b5e594b818898c2b480849216
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1297-9686
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:14:52Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Genetics Selection Evolution
spelling doaj.art-0c75314b5e594b818898c2b4808492162023-03-22T10:03:30ZdeuBMCGenetics Selection Evolution1297-96862023-03-0155111010.1186/s12711-023-00785-3Selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder programCharlie A. de Hollander0Vivian P. Breen1John Henshall2Fernando B. Lopes3Mario PL. Calus4Cobb Vantress, IncCobb Vantress, IncCobb Vantress, IncCobb Vantress, IncAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and ResearchAbstract Background In broiler breeding, genotype-by-environment interaction is known to result in a genetic correlation between body weight measured in bio-secure and commercial environments that is substantially less than 1. Thus, measuring body weights on sibs of selection candidates in a commercial environment and genotyping them could increase genetic progress. Using real data, the aim of this study was to evaluate which genotyping strategy and which proportion of sibs placed in the commercial environment should be genotyped to optimize a sib-testing breeding program in broilers. Phenotypic body weight and genomic information were collected on all sibs raised in a commercial environment, which allowed to retrospectively analyze different sampling strategies and genotyping proportions. Results Accuracies of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) obtained with the different genotyping strategies were assessed by computing their correlation with GEBV obtained when all sibs in the commercial environment were genotyped. Results showed that, compared to random sampling (RND), genotyping sibs with extreme phenotypes (EXT) resulted in higher GEBV accuracy across all genotyping proportions, especially for genotyping proportions of 12.5% or 25%, which resulted in correlations of 0.91 vs 0.88 for 12.5% and 0.94 vs 0.91 for 25% genotyped. Including pedigree on birds with phenotype in the commercial environment that were not genotyped increased accuracy at lower genotyping proportions, especially for the RND strategy (correlations of 0.88 vs 0.65 at 12.5% and 0.91 vs 0.80 at 25%), and a smaller but still substantial increase in accuracy for the EXT strategy (0.91 vs 0.79 for 12.5% and 0.94 vs 0.88 for 25% genotyped). Dispersion bias was virtually absent for RND if 25% or more birds were genotyped. However, GEBV were considerably inflated for EXT, especially when the proportion genotyped was low, which was further exacerbated if the pedigree of non-genotyped sibs was excluded. Conclusions When less than 75% of all animals placed in a commercial environment are genotyped, it is recommended to use the EXT strategy, because it yields the highest accuracy. However, caution should be taken when interpreting the resulting GEBV because they will be over-dispersed. When 75% or more of the animals are genotyped, random sampling is recommended because it yields virtually no bias of GEBV and results in similar accuracies as the EXT strategy.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00785-3
spellingShingle Charlie A. de Hollander
Vivian P. Breen
John Henshall
Fernando B. Lopes
Mario PL. Calus
Selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder program
Genetics Selection Evolution
title Selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder program
title_full Selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder program
title_fullStr Selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder program
title_full_unstemmed Selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder program
title_short Selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder program
title_sort selective genotyping strategies for a sib test scheme of a broiler breeder program
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00785-3
work_keys_str_mv AT charlieadehollander selectivegenotypingstrategiesforasibtestschemeofabroilerbreederprogram
AT vivianpbreen selectivegenotypingstrategiesforasibtestschemeofabroilerbreederprogram
AT johnhenshall selectivegenotypingstrategiesforasibtestschemeofabroilerbreederprogram
AT fernandoblopes selectivegenotypingstrategiesforasibtestschemeofabroilerbreederprogram
AT marioplcalus selectivegenotypingstrategiesforasibtestschemeofabroilerbreederprogram